Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Did anyone here hear Harrison(?) on Randi yesterday talking about a Bush directive to suspend

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 12:27 PM
Original message
Did anyone here hear Harrison(?) on Randi yesterday talking about a Bush directive to suspend
elections in case of a crisis? I caught just a little of it, and it was quite disturbing. Anyone? Anyone? Buellar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
XOKCowboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. I can't take Randi anymore...
so no I didn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alstephenson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Ditto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OffWithTheirHeads Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. Presidential directive 51 I believe.
You can google it. It's why he should be impeached immediatly and why the blood will be on Pelosi's hands if he isn't
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Thank you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rageneau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 12:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. Randi who?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JDPriestly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Here in L.A. we get Johnny Wendel.
He's awful. I turn him off as soon as I hear his voice. Also turn off Lionel and Phil Henrie. They are neither progressive nor liberal. They are just sadly ignorant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. harrison who? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
8. it's a figment of overheated paranoid imaginations
The federal government doesn't run any elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
King Coal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Bush's does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Nope
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
warren pease Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
9. Probably referring to NSPD 51/HSPD-20, which are identical and are allegedly...
...all about maintaining "continuity of government" (COG) in the aftermath of catastrophic event.

Thing is, this PD, by incredible coincidence, sets Bushie up as the sole authority in determining if an act is catastrophic enough to trigger implementation of the COG scenario.

Here's a few of the more outrageous provisions on NSPD 51/HSPD-20:

(b) "Catastrophic Emergency" means any incident, regardless of location, that results in extraordinary levels of mass casualties, damage, or disruption severely affecting the U.S. population, infrastructure, environment, economy, or government functions;“ (which means Katrina II, a California quake, a flood in the Midwest, a massive power outage, etc.)

(18) "The Secretary of Defense, in coordination with the Secretary of Homeland Security, shall provide secure, integrated, Continuity of Government communications to the President, the Vice President, and, at a minimum, Category I executive departments and agencies.” (The shadow government is well cared for and safely out of harms way.)

(6) "The President shall lead the activities of the Federal Government for ensuring constitutional government.” (This is in recognition of The Decider's well-documented veneration for Constitutional law. It also sets him up with the Intergalactic Czar job he's always wanted.)

And that's just the public stuff. The plans for implementing this national security state are so secret that Oregon Congressman Peter DeFazio, a member of the House Homeland Security Committee, was refused a look behind the curtain.

Here's a few links about this PD, starting with the official announcement itself from the White House website.

This article from Global Research does a fine job of pointing out the possibilities behind the officialese.

And this from The Progressive.

Finally, this one from Online Journal does a great job of putting this particular pile of dung into proper context.


wp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 06:36 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think some of the nuttier ones here are going to be very disappointed.
When Obama and the Democratic Party sweep the November elections, instead of their imagined vote fraud conspiracies.

And then I'm sure there will be plenty of unfounded speculation that Bush won't hand over power.

And then come January 20 when there is a peaceful hand over of power and President Obama is sworn in, the conspiracy-bots just won't know what to do, and their heads might explode.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorentz Donating Member (302 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-22-08 06:39 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Some people like to live with fear and anger, apparently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC