|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 05:59 PM Original message |
Jilted Bride Awarded 150K After Wedding Called Off. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parche
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:01 PM Response to Original message |
1. Almost as bad as the hot Mcdonalds Coffee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #1 |
10. Did you ever actually look at that case? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:50 PM Response to Reply #10 |
19. If this poster knew the facts, they would not have said it was frivolous. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TheMadMonk
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:45 PM Response to Reply #19 |
23. Actually they did. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Parche
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:12 AM Response to Reply #10 |
27. Coffee Is Supposed To Be Hot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:06 PM Response to Reply #27 |
38. Not 3rd degree burns to 100% of your crotch hot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 03:58 PM Response to Reply #38 |
48. You are correct! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
napi21
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 10:35 PM Response to Reply #48 |
78. Sorry, but I disagree. ANY sane person should know that putting a hot |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #38 |
49. That is the way its customers wanted the coffee |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:19 PM Response to Reply #49 |
52. That's how McDonalds SAID the customers wanted it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:51 PM Response to Reply #52 |
64. They sell tens of millions of cups of coffee every day |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 08:12 AM Response to Reply #64 |
67. Yes, and Starbucks sells more |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 10:07 PM Response to Reply #67 |
76. Is that why Starbucks is closing stores all over the place. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Sun Jul-27-08 12:07 AM Response to Reply #76 |
84. McDonalds LOWERED THE TEMPERATURE OF THEIR COFFEE |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:56 PM Response to Reply #52 |
65. People commute |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 08:13 AM Response to Reply #65 |
68. This case was over 10 years ago. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:29 PM Response to Reply #49 |
55. Uh huh. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:49 PM Response to Reply #55 |
63. Boy that's really related |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 08:45 PM Response to Reply #38 |
71. Well, regardless of temperature, it's bloody-ass STUPID to set the cup in one's crotch! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 03:20 PM Response to Reply #27 |
47. You cannot make coffee so hot that someone who drinks it would get 3rd degree burns in their throat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:21 PM Response to Reply #27 |
53. Coffee is not supposed to hot enough to burn your epidermis off |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 07:35 PM Response to Reply #53 |
69. Most McDonalds customers drink their coffee instead of pouring it all over |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
yardwork
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 08:51 PM Response to Reply #69 |
73. Would you care to put 180 degree liquid in your mouth? It would burn the hell out of you. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Sun Jul-27-08 12:03 AM Response to Reply #69 |
82. No, I hate Starbucks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Taverner
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #10 |
35. Yes, the McDonalds Coffee case is totally different |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AZ Criminal JD
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 10:02 PM Response to Reply #35 |
75. Were the billions of cups of coffee that they sold before this case |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Celeborn Skywalker
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 11:03 PM Response to Reply #10 |
80. She was still a fucking idiot. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kdmorris
![]() |
Sun Jul-27-08 12:05 AM Response to Reply #80 |
83. Um, yeah... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lame54
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:18 PM Response to Reply #1 |
15. that's an ignorant statement... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Faygo Kid
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:47 PM Response to Reply #1 |
17. Which was an urban legend. Pushed by those who would take away your legal redress. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Hekate
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:40 PM Response to Reply #1 |
45. My sister dropped her McD's coffee cup in the parking lot & almost needed a skin graft on her ankle |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
XemaSab
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:02 PM Response to Original message |
2. No, this is brilliant |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Maddy McCall
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:17 PM Response to Reply #2 |
14. I wonder if my ex has a bass boat. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mikeytherat
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #14 |
29. Bass boat metalflake - ain't nothin' more sparkly in the world! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostinVA
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 10:41 PM Response to Reply #14 |
79. I have two questions for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
billyoc
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
3. The judge will reduce this to cover her car fare, at best. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Belle
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:03 PM Response to Original message |
4. Looks like he'll be paying of the rest of her debt... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
devilgrrl
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:04 PM Response to Original message |
5. I doubt that she'll see a cent of it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
panader0
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
6. Next it'll be a lawsuit claiming that a fiancee couldn't get it up. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DCKit
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:12 PM Response to Reply #6 |
11. No, no, no. "Teh Gays did it." n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Kutjara
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
7. Er...engagements haven't been binding contracts since about... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Manifestor_of_Light
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:14 PM Response to Reply #7 |
12. Breach of promise. NOPE. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
mmonk
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:07 PM Response to Original message |
8. Hhhhhmmmm. Sure sets an interesting precedent. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:09 PM Response to Original message |
9. There was a reason the jury awarded money |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spinbaby
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #9 |
28. He was having an affair with another woman |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:40 AM Response to Reply #28 |
30. This explains it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sanity Claws
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
13. I get the feeling that I didn't hear the full story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:34 PM Response to Reply #13 |
16. There Ain't A Reason In The World That Justifies It. Horrible Precedent. Don't Care What They Heard |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #16 |
31. So, in other words, we should make the judgment on the basis of a |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #31 |
36. No. We Should Make The Judgment On The Basis Of Common Fucking Sense. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:04 PM Response to Reply #36 |
37. Maybe I wasn't clear enough for you |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OPERATIONMINDCRIME
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:20 PM Response to Reply #37 |
39. Guess I Didn't Speak Slowly Enough For You. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Missy Vixen
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:36 PM Response to Reply #39 |
41. Is it impossible for you to disagree without calling someone else "stupid"? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:49 PM Response to Reply #41 |
42. Deleted message |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 03:07 PM Response to Reply #41 |
46. "There is something in the legal code ... that allowed the jury ... to award damages." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Diadem
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:08 PM Response to Reply #13 |
50. Not only left her job, had no career due to his promise. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:28 PM Response to Reply #50 |
54. His liability is based upon her reasonable reliance on his promise & her changing positions ... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue Diadem
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 05:01 PM Response to Reply #54 |
61. In re-reading the article, I see she was working but had given up |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 05:29 PM Response to Reply #61 |
62. Yes, and that is what helps her prove monetary damages. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
krispos42
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #54 |
81. Yet we have no-fault divorce |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
HiFructosePronSyrup
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:49 PM Response to Original message |
18. I'd need more information. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:51 PM Response to Original message |
20. Eventually, Mr. Gibbs will come to realize that $150 K to get out of that relationship was a bargain |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Liberal_in_LA
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:52 PM Response to Original message |
21. Most readers agree with you... see the poll |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
depakid
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 06:54 PM Response to Original message |
22. If you sat on the jury, rather than reacting to local "news" you might see things differently |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AlCzervik
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:49 PM Response to Original message |
24. i watched the video and jury only deliberated for 4 hours so i think she had the better lawyer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:49 PM Response to Reply #24 |
58. 4 hours is not an unusually short time for a verdict |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
LostInAnomie
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 07:56 PM Response to Original message |
25. Yet another reason to never get engaged. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Wed Jul-23-08 08:19 PM Response to Original message |
26. A jury FINDING is not an award. It is simply their fact finding. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #26 |
32. Or the judge could go off the deep end |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:27 PM Response to Reply #32 |
43. No, the judge won't do that. He can't. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:31 PM Response to Reply #43 |
56. delete |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryAmish
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:54 PM Response to Reply #43 |
59. Or maybe he will sentance him to be her butler... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:33 PM Response to Reply #32 |
57. Upon reading a new article, I'll agree that he is an asshole. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
slackmaster
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:11 PM Response to Original message |
33. Imagine how much she would have hooked him for after 5 or 10 years of marriage |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hogwyld
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:39 PM Response to Reply #33 |
34. I can imagine that this ordeal |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Name removed
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 01:23 PM Response to Original message |
40. Deleted message |
Tierra_y_Libertad
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
44. Caveat Emptor. The dipshit groom should learn how to shop. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
katty
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:12 PM Response to Original message |
51. geezus, who is her attorney?! 150K for this?a consenting adult? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Sequoia
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 04:56 PM Response to Original message |
60. He didn't want to live in her parent's basement I guess. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
woo me with science
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:56 PM Response to Original message |
66. Unreal. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
aaaaaa5a
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 08:42 PM Response to Original message |
70. I don't know why any man would ever get married. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deja Q
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 08:47 PM Response to Reply #70 |
72. I'm starting to agree. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Codeine
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 10:16 PM Response to Reply #70 |
77. I have no intention of ever marrying. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Rage for Order
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 09:01 PM Response to Original message |
74. If women thought men were afraid to make a commitment before... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 08:31 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC