Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

New Mexico: republicans Stall Impeachment Resolution

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cogito ergo doleo Donating Member (382 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:09 AM
Original message
New Mexico: republicans Stall Impeachment Resolution
From MotherMedia:

"Urgent Alert: Republicans Mount Counterattack, Stall Impeachment Resolution in Procedural Maneuver. Floor Vote Called Prior to Debate for Tomorrow, Thursday March 7th During Floor Session. All Citizens to the Roundhouse 9:30 AM On. Check Senate Print Media Gallery for Updates."

"With shock I received word today from resolution sponsor Senator Ortiz y Pino's secretary Sharon Shaffer that the Republicans had used a procedural maneuver to stall the Impeachment Resolution and prevent a full debate on the floor. Immediately double-checking with Majority Leader Michael Sanchez's secretary Sharmaine, I realized that the impeachment resolution had been dealt a serious if not fatal blow."

"Therefore, it is now urgently important to call in high volume and with utmost respect to the swing vote Senators listed below under action items via the Capitol Switchboard at 986-4300. Let them know through their secretaries that the Republicans have chosen to use an unfair procedural method to require a vote on the resolution before it even gets a chance to be openly debated. Explain that there will be a Senate Floor roll call vote on the adoption of the Judicairy Committee Report with the Impeachment Resolution SJR 5 in it, and ask them to be on the floor alert to vote in favor."

http://www.mothermedia.org/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:27 AM
Response to Original message
1. More:
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 05:15 AM by Hissyspit
"This vote may be more difficult to win than the vote for final passage, because it must be taken without opportunity for debate on the merits of the resolution. Some believe that Senator Sanchez has everything under control and will successfully move adoption when he gets the opportunity. According to experienced sources, there is a remote possibility that there will be a "Call of the Senate" wherein the State Police are assigned to track down every Senator and all are required to be on hand. Regardless, this moment of truth will be a historic occasion and it is essential that maximum public scrutiny of the decision be brought to bear in order that the gravity of the decision be made clear by the citizenry."


From the New Mexico legislature official webpage:

http://legis.state.nm.us/lcs/_session.asp?w=com&year=07&chamber=S&type=JR&number=5

2007 Regular Session

SJR5
IMPEACHMENT OF GEORGE W. BUSH

Sponsor: Gerald Ortiz y Pino

Current Location: Died

Actions: (Key to Abbreviations)
<2> SRC/SPAC/SJC-SRC <19> DP-SPAC <27> DP-SJC <39> DP nt adptd.


"SJC DP nt adptd" means that it has passed the Senate Judiciary Committee but the report has not yet been adopted, but I'm confused on what "Location: Died" means. Usually when a bill is "dead," it means it is just that.

In her post, she seems to be saying that the SJC adoption will be voted on this morning, THURSDAY, but then she puts the 7th, which was yesterday. I assume the 7 is a typo, otherwise we would have heard more about this yesterday.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:16 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. .
Kick for input.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Leland is probably a "he." n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reprehensor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Thanks!
Saved me a posting!

Come on NM! Save the planet! Impeach the douche!

Il douche! Heh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
5. If impeachment would improve the numbers
(as it did Clinton), the Repukes would be saying "go ahead"!

But they realize that the country is not thrilled with impeaching over a BJ, and exposing the crimes against humanity committed by the Repuke Bush would make him even less popular ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Send the legislators the op ed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC