|
![]() ![]() ![]() |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
question everything
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 09:10 PM Original message |
McQuaid: Edwards Love Child, Yawn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Olney Blue
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 09:21 PM Response to Original message |
1. Is this story really true? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. No one knows. On the one hand, it is the National Enquirer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 07:27 PM Response to Reply #2 |
19. This story is going to break in the mainstream media within |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Cleita
![]() |
Thu Jul-24-08 09:32 PM Response to Reply #1 |
3. I don't think so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:41 PM Response to Reply #1 |
11. It may be true, but who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myhawgoff
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:55 PM Response to Reply #11 |
15. It may be true, but who cares? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 07:06 PM Response to Reply #15 |
16. Which is why it is between the two of them |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 07:28 PM Response to Reply #11 |
20. Oh really?? Poor Elizabeth. I cannot believe you would even |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Raine
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 09:01 PM Response to Reply #20 |
22. Agree |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:18 PM Response to Reply #22 |
24. Ditto. And I cannot even BELIEVE people who think that in any |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:32 PM Response to Reply #24 |
27. I hope that you and your husband will pull through |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 12:03 AM Response to Reply #27 |
33. We're hanging in there, thirty years this year. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
31. I don't think it's "ok", but I also don't have enough facts (even supposing it's true) to condemn |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:37 PM Response to Reply #11 |
28. Geez, glad I'm a lesbian. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #28 |
34. It appears that you understand what love is. Too bad |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
readmoreoften
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 10:11 PM Response to Reply #34 |
41. Fidelity is everything. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Sun Jul-27-08 05:21 AM Response to Reply #41 |
43. I'm sorry, but I do not roll on "open relationships". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:00 AM Response to Original message |
4. i don't believe it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
orleans
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 02:38 AM Response to Reply #4 |
5. but you're assuming. we actually don't know--just like we don't know |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
shireen
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:14 AM Response to Reply #5 |
6. if you read my message again |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:20 PM Response to Reply #4 |
25. Oh sure he would. Someone who is as involved in politics as |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
johnaries
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 10:21 AM Response to Original message |
7. National Enquirer update - his love child really is...... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 07:09 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Because recently Edwards came back to the potenial VP list |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:03 AM Response to Original message |
8. The Enquirer's heard of photoshopping ... lol... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:07 AM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Here, here Wave. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Hey rock ! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
asdjrocky
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:42 PM Response to Reply #10 |
12. Well, then that's a whole 'nother story.... er, right? nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 07:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
21. No they weren't. A security guard has come forth. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:47 PM Response to Reply #21 |
30. As reported on Fox News which is as questionable as the National Enquirer |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 12:05 AM Response to Reply #30 |
35. They didn't say they took photos, they said they questioned |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
KitchenWitch
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 12:42 AM Response to Reply #21 |
38. Wonder how much he was paid to fabricate a story |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 01:10 PM Response to Reply #21 |
39. So did a "...former Edwards staffer...." |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
unapatriciated
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #8 |
36. and he didn't have a camera? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
FredScuttle
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:46 PM Response to Original message |
13. As Kos says, if the MSM is supposed to cover the Edwards "scandal" |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
frogmarch
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 12:51 PM Response to Original message |
14. so-called "love children" are non-issues |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
JeanGrey
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:21 PM Response to Reply #14 |
26. They aren't "non issues" to a lot of folks. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
marshall
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:56 PM Response to Reply #14 |
32. That statement by McQuaid makes absoutely no sense |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
spanone
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 07:21 PM Response to Original message |
18. i wouldn't wipe my rear with the enquirer let alone judge another person by a story from it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
trayfoot
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 09:19 PM Response to Original message |
23. Better Be CAREFUL!!!!!!!! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
question everything
![]() |
Fri Jul-25-08 11:40 PM Response to Reply #23 |
29. Unfortunately, sometimes you start with a serious discussion |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
RamboLiberal
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 12:12 AM Response to Original message |
37. Philadelphia Daily News has an interesting point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Catchawave
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 01:17 PM Response to Reply #37 |
40. Many celebrities were staying there for interviews w/TCA |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
tuckessee
![]() |
Sat Jul-26-08 10:23 PM Response to Original message |
42. Bookmarked. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU
AdBot (1000+ posts) ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Sat Sep 07th 2024, 06:29 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
![]() |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC