Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I honestly feel that there's someone behind Matt Sanchez and Jeff Gannon.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:02 PM
Original message
I honestly feel that there's someone behind Matt Sanchez and Jeff Gannon.
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 02:02 PM by trumad
excuse the huge pun---but the access Gannon had and the quick rise to the top that Sanchez enjoyed had to come from some big wig who helped them rise to the top---sort of like cream in your coffee.

I've always thought the help came from Big Karl himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. so where has Karl Rove been lately?
Cruising the recruitment offices in DC? :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whoa_Nelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Rove was just in Little Rock, AR
http://www.arktimes.com/blogs/arkansasblog/2007/03/rove_speaks_in_little_rock.aspx

We just attended Karl Rove's speech at the Statehouse Convention Center in Little Rock, which was organized by the Clinton School of Public Service.

Rove spoke mainly about presidential history, but in a question-and-answer session that followed, he addressed the uproar over interim U.S. Attorney appointments, the Bush administration's response to Hurricane Katrina, the conviction of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and other topics. (Rove took questions from Clinton School Dean Skip Rutherford. The audience was not given the opportunity to ask questions.)


Video of Rove's speaking engagement at above link
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orion9941 Donating Member (256 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
2. The velvet mafia perhaps? ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:06 PM
Response to Original message
3. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. Totally in agreement!
Think about it: 2 guys with chiseled, military appearances who look good on camera and are adept at lying their heads off...Someone high up in the conservative party is recruiting DIRECTLY out of the male prostitution racket!

Really makes you wonder about Oliver North, don't it? Man, think of the fun Oliver Stone would have with THIS conspiracy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. Someone high up in the conservative party is recruiting DIRECTLY out of the male prostitution racket
Exactly. There can be no other explanation.

Gannon/Guckert didn't start his fake 'news career' on his own;
he was scripted and costumed and given ACCESS by someone with
some serious pull.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. Bingo and we needa client list
urgently.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkofos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't know about sanchez but gannon claimed to be a top
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:11 PM
Response to Original message
6. Let's get all the anal sex jokes out now.
Go head.

Jesus Christ, it's like 4th fucking grade here half the time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. There's nothing unfunny about anal sex...
...or any other sexual position, for that manner. Sex of any stripe is ripe for humor.

"It's as close as you can get to another person without actually BEING them," as my brother used to say....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:17 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. WTF does this story have to do with anal sex
This entire thread is an excuse to make gay jokes.

Why don't you just call him a "fa**ot?" It's just a schoolyard taunt right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Nothing. So why are you bringing it up?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I didn't.
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 02:23 PM by Harvey Korman
The OP and other posters did, if you read the thread.

And as a bonus, we get the same "a Republican we don't like must be gay" (or its close cousin: there's a secret society of gays that pull the levers of the Republican Party) homophobic bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Where are the gay jokes?
There are plenty of sex jokes, which is natural with a prostitute/porn star. That isn't gay-bashing, any more than the below thread is straight-bashing.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=368764&mesg_id=368764
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. You POSTED ONE yourself
What are you talking about?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. That wasn't a gay joke.
It was a sex joke. The funny part of the situation isn't the homosexuality. It's the prostitution. It would be equally applicable if one of them were a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #19
23. Really?
If we were talking about a woman in the republican party who had a past, you'd post a joke about her getting fucked in the ass by Karl Rove?

Interesting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #8
21. Other than the fact the dude is a fomer porn star and prostitute?
Nothing, I guess.

They're sex jokes, not gay jokes. There's a difference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:21 PM
Response to Original message
11. Perfect thread for me to ask a question
On Olberman the other night, a blogger (forget who) mentioned that several gay blogs had good posts about the RW cabal of closeted gays and the influence they have. I looked around a little but gave up because I hit too many porn sites. Does anyone have links to good discussion of this?

I agree with the OP. I do think there is a cabal of politically connected closeted gays that hold influence in the Republican party. I'd like to read the blog posts about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:26 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. Watch out!
The cabal of politically connected closeted gay republicans is going to destroy the world!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bicoastal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. I have a serious question.
Why are these guys Republicans? They have the right to do whatever they do, but isn't it clear enough that their own party hates them?

Your thoughts....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:31 PM
Response to Reply #24
28. Because they're self-hating and aren't strong enough be themselves
In a homophobic society that heterosexuals have created.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. .
"In a homophobic society that heterosexuals have created."

:think:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
15. Enough already.
Attempting to smear people my making suggestions that they are gay is neither witty nor appropriate.

The only people who are insulted are the gays.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Nah. Didn't you hear? We have INSIDERS who secretly control the Republican Party!
We should be the most powerful group in America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. I forgot about the gay republic cabal
:evilgrin: We could take over the world at any time, we're just waiting until we've converted some of the better-looking straight people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. Your concern overwhelms me...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
27. I agree. Too bad that has NOTHING to do with this thread. Your CONCERNS are duly noted. nm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hulklogan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. Wasn't the OP insinuating that KKK Rove was gay?
Hence the suggestion that he was "behind" the Sanchez/Gannon cabal?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. We have a lot of people on this thread with
reading comprehension problems. Very curious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
26. That would explain how Jeff Gannon could get Secret Service clearance
...using an alias. I thought you had to be squeaky-clean to get close to the President, and using an alias would've been frowned upon...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trumad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:33 PM
Response to Reply #26
32. Well back then we all specualted that it was Rove that set Gannon up...
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 02:33 PM by trumad
and now this Sanchez guy gets quick notoriety just because he said a couple of anti-war protesters gave him shit.

Way to convenient.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 02:34 PM
Response to Original message
33. Locking
The moderators have agreed that this thread has become totally inappropriate.

Please do not start threads for the purpose of starting a flame war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC