Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

House Oversight Committee's letter to Fitzgerald !!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:00 PM
Original message
House Oversight Committee's letter to Fitzgerald !!
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 03:01 PM by annabanana
March 8, 2007

The Honorable Patrick J. Fitzgerald

Special Counsel

Office of Special Counsel

Bond Federal Building

1400 New York Avenue NW

Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20530

Dear Mr. Fitzgerald:

I commend you on your professional and thorough investigation into the disclosure of Valerie Plame Wilson's identity as a covert CIA agent. It is apparent that you followed the facts where they led and served the interests of justice and the American people.

By necessity, your investigation had a narrow legal focus: Were any federal criminal statutes violated by White House officials? Your investigation, however, has raised broader questions of national significance. I am writing to invite you to meet to discuss how the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, which is the principal oversight committee in the U.S. House of Representatives, can become informed of your views about these broader issues.

The identity of undercover CIA operatives is supposed to be one of the most closely guarded national security secrets. There are a host of administrative requirements designed to safeguard this type of information from disclosure. Yet the trial proceedings raise questions about whether senior White House officials, including the Vice President and Senior Advisor to the President Karl Rove, complied with the requirements governing the handling of classified information. They also raise questions about whether the White House took appropriate remedial action following the leak and whether the existing requirements are sufficient to protect against future leaks. Your perspective on these matters is important.

After the verdict was announced yesterday, one juror expressed the view that former Chief of Staff to the Vice President Lewis "Scooter" Libby was only a "fall guy." This juror's views encapsulated questions that many in Congress and the public have about whether the ultimate responsibility for the outing of Ms. Wilson rests with more senior officials in the White House. This is another area where you have a unique perspective.

I recognize that as a federal prosecutor, you are constrained by the rules of grand jury secrecy. But you undoubtedly recognize that Congress has a responsibility to examine the policy and accountability questions that your investigation has raised. As a result of your investigation, you have a singular understanding of the facts and their implications that bear directly on the issues before Congress.

I respectfully request that you meet with me and the Committee's Ranking Member, Tom Davis, to discuss the possibility of testifying before the Committee and other means by which you can inform the Committee about your views and the insights you obtained during the course of your investigation.

I look forward to the opportunity to speak with you.

Sincerely,

Henry A. Waxman

Chairman

cc: Tom Davis

Ranking Minority Member

http://www.oversight.house.gov/

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Octafish Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. Music to my ears.
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 03:05 PM by Octafish
Odds are, without a Democratic majority, we never would have heard:

I respectfully request that you meet with me and the Committee's Ranking Member, Tom Davis, to discuss the possibility of testifying before the Committee and other means by which you can inform the Committee about your views and the insights you obtained during the course of your investigation.

Thanks, annabanana.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Isn't it lovely, my friend...
And a long time coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #1
26. About time!
After all the electoral shenanigans, it's good to see justice is about to prevail, despite all their worst efforts.

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mandate My Ass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:07 PM
Response to Original message
3. Happy happy joy joy

Testify!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. It's those pesky rules of Grand Jury secrecy
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 03:28 PM by leveymg
Would love to hear/read the transcript of Fitz's 2004 discussion with the Vice President. If Cheney admitted to Fitz the essential facts that he had ordered Libby to out Plame, that raises some disturbing issues in my mind, that Fitz didn't pursue an IIPA indictment against the Veep. If Cheney, on the other hand, withheld those essential facts, that raises another set of distruebing questions about why the Veep wasn't indicted for Obstruction.

It's gotta one or the other. The outcome isn't satisfying, and I'd like to see Fitz address these questions.

The GJ was convened on 10/31/03. It is unclear when Fitz first interviewed Cheney. The WashPost indictates that Bush was interviewed on June 23, 2004, following Cheney's interview that took place earlier that month: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A3668-2004Jun24.html

Fitzgerald's session with Bush comes amid a flurry of recent interviews and subpoenas from investigators who have operated in almost complete secrecy for six months, giving little outward indication of where the probe is headed. White House counsel Alberto R. Gonzales testified on June 18 before a grand jury taking testimony in the case, and it was revealed in early June that prosecutors had interviewed Vice President Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bandit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:49 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. Rules of Grand Jury Secrecy that Ken Starr followed so thoroughly..
Waxman is most definitely a Democratic hero..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
5. Smart fella, that Waxman, huh!!??
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 03:19 PM by speedoo
Yeah, I'm very, very glad he's Chairman of that Committee.

Not getting my hopes up too high, cuz Fitz is very cautious, but I like it!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
6. Uhhmmmmmm, someone's in trouble...
Finally!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
7. Take a lesson, Pelosi.
This is a prime example of a little something called "doing".

You're either on the table, or off the table. Time to make your choice for the future of America.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
8. Beautiful.
:applause::applause::applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sicksicksick_N_tired Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
9. Oh, wow,...I just don't know if I can handle this much good news!!!!
:applause: I wonder how much information CAN be secured by Congress. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. Welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Go, Bulldog, go! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CrazyOrangeCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. awesome
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Way to go, Waxman!
:bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. here is link to the letter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
15. So Beautiful that lovely sound
of Justice actually seeking the Truth.

Patrick Fitzgerald will go down in history as one of the Knights in Shining Armor who dared to oppose the bush regime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Glimmer of Hope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. Hearing starts next Friday!
Unless otherwise noted, Full Committee hearings will be broadcast on the web.

Upcoming Hearings and Meetings
Full Committee hearing on the Disclosure of CIA Agent Valerie Plame Wilson's Identity
Friday, March 16, 2007, time to be announced, in 2154 Rayburn House Office Building

<http://www.oversight.house.gov/schedule.asp>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Thanks for the time and place!
(tucking it into my calendar)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Starfury Donating Member (615 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 04:44 PM
Response to Original message
17. Sweet! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. Kick, kick, kick. n/t
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
puebloknot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
20. Wow! There's a D.C. God, after all. Splendid news! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IWantAChange Donating Member (974 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
21. Rep Waxman is going to keep lifting the Wizard's curtain for all to see
and the country will be better for it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Javaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
22. To quote Fat Tony: "this ain't over". lol nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AikidoSoul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. Somebody should send Waxman the "how to" prosecute Rove
and Cheney that was put out on DU yesterday -- in an excellent article by Elizabeth de la Vega

Kick and recommend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. Hand over Cheney to me, Mr. Fitzgerald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 06:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC