Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

What do we have on Fox's "Not Convicted of Lying to FBI" Banner on Libby?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:42 PM
Original message
What do we have on Fox's "Not Convicted of Lying to FBI" Banner on Libby?
Is there actual videotape? Is there a photo of the screen itself?

I have mentioned this to people and they all want to see it themselves.

Help me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Benhurst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
1. As requested ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snowbear Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. And here's another one....






....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
3. I like this one better.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
agtcovert Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:30 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Hahaha
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Critters2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. ROFLMAO!! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:33 PM
Response to Original message
6. What's the problem? It's true. He was found innocent of that.
There were five charges. He was found guilty of making false statements, two of perjury, and one of obstruction of justice. He was found innocent of having made false statements to the FBI. The Fox News headlines seen there were immediately followed and preceded by what he was found guilty of.

Seriously, I hate Fox News, but this is stupid. We shouldn't be mocking them for getting a story right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. You're kidding, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:38 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. No, I am not. He was found not guilty of lying to the FBI.
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 08:38 PM by Kelly Rupert
He was found guilty of the other four charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Exactly
So out of FIVE charges, Fox reports him innocent of ONE, instead of guilty of FOUR.

The news was that he was guilty. Fox tried to make it sound like he was acquitted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Did you actually watch the broadcast?
Because I did. I switch between the three cable channels when I watch the news. They also said he was guilty of the other four. They reported that he was guilty of the four. Think about it: how could they not? They did the same wall-to-wall coverage that the other stations did. And they spent as much time on his guilt as the others did.

There's plenty to attack Fox on. We don't need to engage in hard spin to make them look bad. That's their game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. They never ran a banner saying he was found guilty of lying to the FBI.
We watched all morning to watch Fox suffer as they reported the news.

To run a banner that says he was found "not guilty of lying to the FBI" and not to run a banner that says that he was also "found guilty of lying to the FBI" is typical of Fox.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. They did say he was found guilty of the other four charges.
Since two of them were "lying to the FBI," it would have just been confusing for people who didn't follow the case closely (that is, Fox's entire audience) to see "Libby found guilty of lying to FBI" followed by "Libby found not guilty of lying to FBI." Really, it's a minor thing. They made it clear that he had been convicted of four felonies. They did not spend excessive time on his acquittal on one charge. They aren't really at fault here.

Ah well. It doesn't really matter, I suppose. I better stop defending Fox before I start looking like a freeper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Yes, they "said" it, but their banner (subject of this post) said otherwise.
Where was a banner stating the fact that Libby was convicted of lying to the FBI? There wasn't one.

The fact that they "reported" it, but ran a banner that is clearly misleading and ran it all day long is the subject of this thread.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 08:50 AM
Response to Reply #11
16. I didn't. I refuse to watch Fox Noise
But, that's not the issue. The point is, by its own nature it is disingenuous to list the facts in the manner in which they did. It is a classic case of misinformation. People who listen to their entire broadcast may get a complete picture of what happened, but there are a lot of people that only pay partial attention, and they get skewed. Fox Noise knows there's a substantial portion of their potential audience who are not giving full attention - maybe they're flipping through the channels, or going through bills, or something else which takes away their attention - and screens like the one we're talking about are for them. So, I do believe that this is a case of Fox trying to mislead, and then claim innocence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mugsy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Funny because he WAS!
There were TWO counts of "Lying to the prosecution" and Libby was convicted of one of them, so the fact is, while he wasn't convicted of BOTH charges of "lying to the FBI", he was convicted of lying to Federal Investigators. Not much difference if you ask me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lint Head Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:08 PM
Response to Original message
12. I Contacted Faux News Directly

I went to the Faux news website and in the lower left hand corner I keyed in the news tip.

"Urgent News: Scooter Libby convicted of four felonies including lying to the FBI!"

After clicking submit I received a pop up that said they would get right on it and my anonymity would be protected.

Everyone at DU should do the same. Apparently Faux didn't get the news.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kelly Rupert Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Yes, he was.
And he was also found innocent of lying to the FBI on a different occasion. Seriously, this just makes us look stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC