Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Zogby predicted it will be Gore against Giuliani. Rasmussen went out on a limb

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:07 PM
Original message
Zogby predicted it will be Gore against Giuliani. Rasmussen went out on a limb
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 09:10 PM by Quixote1818
and predicted it would be Richardson against Giuliani. Sean Hannity had both pollsters on today making predictions and giving opinions.

The one way I see Richardson pulling off an upset is for him to take California which is heavily Hispanic. I am not sure how else Rasmussen came to that conclusion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
1. Both of them would clean Rudy's clock
Clark would just crush any Repug because he has an extremely strong backround.
Gore/Richardson? Clark/Richardson?

What about Richardson/Webb?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Denver Mayor Wellington Webb (he's extremely popular)
and he's black!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
2. I respect these guys' insights but believe Giuliani is dead on arrival.
A conservative fundie nutcase showing up for the GOP primary in several U.S. states is not going to tolerate Giuliani's multiple marriage difficulties, his estranged family relations, the so-called liberal stances on same-sex rights and Choice, not to mention the Catholic-big-city-back-east thing.

I know the polls currently have him in the lead for the Rethugs. But I'm not convinced those are sustainable numbers. Someone on John McCain's staff already has contracted out for a pile of television and radio ads that will whittle America's Mayor down to size. In doable doses, even Brownback will beat Giuliani in Iowa.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. It's also too early.
Joe Scarbourough argued that there is a strong chance that the nominees have not even entered the race yet, or they they are very far behind.

That was the arguement to explain a possible Gore v. Gingrich 08' campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. I hear that argument. And there are historical precedents for it, too.
So I'm not closed to the option(s). I think Bill Clinton was running well less than 5% nationally a year before the Iowa caucuses.

I'll take what comes, but I'm expecting Giuliani to encounter considerable opponent turbulence in the coming months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm expecting a bloodbath on the GOP's side for their nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. The bloodier the better, then. I'd love it if the various candidates
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 09:38 PM by Old Crusoe
began splintering the party into irreconcilable factions. Let them rip at each others flesh and gnaw at each other's jugulars.

The GOP is in a weakened position going into a presidential year this time, and I'm all for taking maximum advantage of it. If they want to help out and tear each other to smithereens beforehand, I'm all for that, too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WorseBeforeBetter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
22. Yikes, I agree with Scarborough.
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 09:54 PM by TWriterD
I've been thinking for a couple of weeks that it will be a Gore v. Nuck Fewt race. (I'm thinking maybe Clark as VP, if he'd accept it. Or possibly Gov. Easley of NC.) Newt is sucking up to Dobson and the wingnuts and they'll forgive him and that pesky little affair. Corporate Media won't present any of the other unsavoriness surrounding Newt, so he's safe. The wingnuts have been burned royally by the Bush Admin so they'll pull out all the stops to see that they get their GGG (God, gays, and guns) candidate in 2008.

I agree that it's too early. How can anyone sustain this pace, lead, etc. over this long a period of time? I'm getting to the point of tuning them out and it's only March 2007!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I think you're right in stating the findies will never accept Rudy, BUT
I'm not so sure they won't just stay home! So far, that group isn't happy with any of the candidates. The one reason I think Rudy might fall is because in almost every case, the front runner almost 2 years out NEVER is the winner!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. I'd love to have the damn fundies stay home. That is a SWEET scenario.
Tell me how much money to lay down on the barrel and let's get that done.

True -- often those now first are later last, or at least they lose their top billing. This 2008 race is going to be a barnburner, isn't it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Agree with that
Ghouli also has a foot in mouth problem, he's bound to say something surreal that will help sink him with those currently entranced with his hero image.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Hi, Nite Owl. I may be underestimating the man, or under-counting his
supporters, but I just never got the "hero" thing from Giuliani.

There he was on the news with the bullhorn at Ground Zero, etc., but it just never reached me deep down as a significant performance. I was more impressed with the spouses of the victims and the pressure they brought to bear on Bush for accountability.

But I've been a poor guesser in primaries before, so I'm not claiming certainty on anything this far away from the first votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. I disagree
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 09:22 PM by Quixote1818
What I find interesting is how Hannity and Rush seem to be playing down Giuliani's less than conservative credentials. I get the impression they really don't have any conviction and just want to win. Both Zogby and Rasmussen felt Giuliani could weather his negatives.

When you have Pat Robertson giving the religious right the nod that it's OK to vote for Rudy you have to know they are all lining up behind him. I think Zogby and Rasmussen are absolutely spot on!


They also pointed out that California would put Rudy over the top. California is throwing everything out of whack this year because it allows a moderate to jump ahead early on unlike in the past when South Carolina shifted everything to the far, far right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AX10 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:25 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Alot can happen in the coming months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Absolutely
It is true that Rudy has a ton of negatives and the culmination could certainly do him in. And as someone pointed out, he has a tendency to put his foot in his mouth. You can't do that in this day in age.

I do however think the Religious Right will let Rudy slide because he is strong on defense. Thats almost all they really care about.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:34 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Could be. If California hands Rudy a big basket of delegates, his
chances would improve, granted. But he has to win in Iowa and/or New Hampshire to provide viability and context first, and I'm seeing some obstacles for him.

Iowa put Pat Robertson, of all people, second to Bush in one caucus. Fundie support is out there, although to date it's not enough to put a fundie candidate in first place in Iowa. But maybe with a crowded field this time, a Brownback could slip through and win there.

How awkward that would be for the Rethuglicans to have a certified nutcase win the Iowa caucuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cally Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:40 PM
Response to Reply #7
20. Only Republicans can vote in their primary,
independents are only allowed to vote in the Democratic primary in California. California Republicans are very conservative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:54 PM
Response to Reply #20
23. Good point
I didn't think of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madinmaryland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
15. I think Giuliani will be gone before the first primary.
He's only in it for the book deal. Make a bundle of money promoting himself, letting everyone else pay for it. Typical republic party tactic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. I disagree with Zogby
I don't think Gore will run, and this thing is between Edwards, Obama, Giuliani & Romney. Among those 4 individuals is the next president of the USA.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:38 PM
Response to Original message
18. Gore vs Hagel.
Republics may put in Hagel just to lure some Dems over. But Gore will win hands down. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:39 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Is he going to run?
I mean, everybody is saying Gore will run, except for Gore himself. Just like Wesley Clark, he's running according to everyone but himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #19
27. No probably not. He's the most desirable, qualified, experienced,
wished for, hoped for and prayed for candidate in the last one hundred and fify years and has already been elected once by the American people. Why on earth should he be interested this time?

Survey says.........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:48 PM
Response to Original message
21. The republicans will cede the '08 election & Gore will run unapposed
oh wait...i keep forgetting that we're not living in a perfect world.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 09:58 PM
Response to Original message
24. It won't be Giuliani.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nevergiveup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
25. I personally don't think
Giuliani can be stopped. The Republicans I know love him and wouldn't turn on him if it became known he had an affair with a horse. For the Democrats I think it will come down to Obama or Richardson. If Gore gets in it would be a different story but I believe he is happy with his life and will not run. A Gore endorsement of Obama this fall would not surprise me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
femmocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
26. It won't be Richardson either. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC