Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

State prison medical treatment called 'hoax'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:41 AM
Original message
State prison medical treatment called 'hoax'
State prison medical treatment called 'hoax'

Wednesday, February 28, 2007
By Pat Shellenbarger
The Grand Rapids Press

http://www.mlive.com/news/grpress/index.ssf?/base/news-34/1172678116243210.xml&coll=6&thispage=1

LANSING -- Fredrick Heinz needed medical care to save his life.


Doing time in Marquette Branch Prison, he begged prison doctors to treat his hepatitis C, but was turned down, told it would cost too much, a friend, Jackie Deming, told a state legislative committee Tuesday.

When he was diagnosed with stomach cancer in November, Heinz asked for pain medication and was given two Tylenol in the morning and two at night, Deming testified. But when he asked for something stronger, the doctor took away the Tylenol, she said.


He was scheduled for cancer surgery, but then was transferred to another prison where the medical personnel said they had no record of his illnesses.

<snip>
His remarks were echoed by Gary Peterson, employed to schedule inmates' medical appointments at Marquette Branch Prison. Before the state privatized the medical care, the prison had three doctors, each seeing an average 25 to 30 inmates a day, said Peterson, a steward for the UAW local representing some prison employees. After CMS took over the care, the prison was cut back to one doctor seeing an average of eight to 10 patients a day, he said.




Republicans love to privatize everything. Even as people continue to die as a result, they keep pushing for more and more privatization. The state are ultimately responsible for the people in prison and are the one who will be paying settlements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. Regardless of whether or not these men were incarcerated for
criminal activity, the treatment they received were human rights abuse.

Someone needs to be thumped.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I would be skeptical.
Many inmates have nothing better to do with their time than start frivolous and purely recreational or retaliatory lawsuits. They do so for free under the in forma pauperis statute, and hence, a lawsuit is nothing more than a lottery ticket or a means to bust the chops of those charged with their custody.

To be sure, the Eighth Amendment requires that inmates be afforded adequate medical care at State expense, and occasionally there are failings. However, the care provided to inmates in prison is often better than they could ever hope to get had they never been sent to prison. I wouldn't be so quick to judge the sufficiency of care provided to any inmate based upon one media report, and I certainly would be skeptical of the self-serving statements made by an inmate to the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prisoner_Number_Six Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:39 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Tylenol as a sole treatment for cancer is adequate care???
If you're a doctor I sure as hell won't be coming to you for my health needs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
djg21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. My guess is that you haven't reviewed his medical records.
and hence you have no first-hand knowledge regarding the inmate's actual medical condition(s), the complaints he actually made to medical staff when seeking treatment for his real or imagined medical conditions, or the care that actually was provided to him. Hence, you have no clue whatsoever about anything you are spouting off about. My suggestion to you is to put aside your prejudices and preconcieved notions regarding prisons and be a bit more objective. Even the article that is the basis for this thread makes clear that prison officials offered a contradictory version of events.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
High Plains Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. So, which prison do you work for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I'm guessing it's a lot of stock in Corrections Medical Services
Or Prison Health Sevices or any other for profit prison "healthcare" scam company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:43 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. You sound as if you have constitutional protection against cruel and unusual punishment!
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 02:43 PM by Cobalt Violet
Stop that!:sarcasm:

They only way these privatize health companies with fixed contracts make money is to deny care. The more they deny the more the make.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. So the 51 year old dead guy isn't dead?
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 01:07 PM by Cobalt Violet
He would've gotten asprin for cancer and no treatment what so ever for hepatitis C outside?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. I live in Michigan, and Hubby's an internist. It's not just one report.
This story has been in our local news off and on for years. The reality is, the prison medical system is scary, and the inmates get the worst care imaginable. Hubby had to treat a couple of inmates in residency when they needed to be admitted--he was horrified by what he saw.

There aren't occasional failings--it's the way things are in Michigan prisons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. It's the way things are in many prisons.
I think the ones with the privatized health "services" are the killing people.

One companies cautionary statements included this as a inherent risk to foward looking statements disciaimer: "-- the Company's ability to limit its exposure for catastrophic illnesses and injuries in excess of amounts covered under contracts or insurance coverage;"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knitter4democracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 10:19 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. Which is really sad.
*sigh* Prisons, the way they are now, create more problems than they solve. Why can't we figure this out better?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #16
20. That's the crux of the matter
The private prison system in Texas is a horror story.
The state run facilities get the best of care.
Hence, most of the state run are going private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 10:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
19. I would be skeptical too except I've dealt with the crap that passes
Edited on Sun Mar-11-07 10:26 AM by sfexpat2000
for care in the prison system. Self serving statements can also be true ones.

/typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:58 AM
Response to Original message
2. Another privatization catastrophe.
Unless death of prisoners is the desired result?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:14 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. They are making it impossible for HCV prisoners to qualify for treatment.
I have heard that the virus infects 40-60% of the prison population. At $20,000 a year to treat they just don't want to. They make it impossible for most who need treatment to qualify for it. I think for Correctional Medical Services the goal is prisoner death; It's cheaper.

Or some will get out before they die. By the time they get out of prison them may well need a liver transplant that could cost $400,000 and a life time of maintenance medications that could cost thousands a year too. There aren't that many livers to go around so many will die waiting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're prisoners. They don't count as people.
:sarcasm:

The average Repig will not care about this at all though, because they really do see these people as unimportant because they are in prison. The average Repig will not be concerned about anything until it hits them directly, then they'll pitch a fit until they get what they want, then they'll go back to not caring about the system again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. Someone always has to die for them to make money.
People better pay attention because someday some repuker will come up with a way to make money of their death and no one will be around to stop it or care.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
7. Totally fucking unacceptable. Privatization NEVER works for anyone but those who profit from it.-n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. This is from a press realease of a for profit prison health company...
Where it is listing the risks of future profits:


"the Company's ability to limit its exposure for catastrophic illnesses and injuries in excess of amounts covered under contracts or insurance coverage;"


Very telling. :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
18. One of my nurse colleagues
worked as a jail nurse in Central Texas.
She told me that they had a 30'ish year old woman who was jailed for a non-violent crime (I think it was hot checks or something)and started having extremely heavy periods.
My colleague kept reporting it to the doctor and he wouldn't do any further testing.
Ended up, after 6 months she had cervical cancer. She never received treatment and she died.
My colleague quit. She couldn't stand watching a prisoner die before her eyes and not be able to help.
The "inmate" left a couple of small kids.
Very sad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cobalt Violet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. That's terrible.
We have a gulag. There isn't any other way to see it. Privatization is turning everything into a gulag.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC