Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rove: Next President will embrace 'Bush Doctrine'

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:09 AM
Original message
Rove: Next President will embrace 'Bush Doctrine'
http://rawstory.com/news/2007/Rove_Next_President_will_embrace_Bush_0309.html

Karl Rove predicted in a Washington Post article today that future Presidents of the United States will embrace President George W. Bush's doctrine of 'preemptive war.' The statement came when the top White House adviser was asked what the 43rd president's legacy would be.

Michael Abramowitz reported today on the various activities Karl Rove has engaged in to promote the president's legacy. Although he has said there is an attitude of "Why worry about it?" in the White House, Abramowitz points to Rove's efforts "to put his own distinctive spin on current events and the longer historical view."

...

The so-called Bush Doctrine of preemptive war, Rove said, "has a logic of force and nature and reality that will cause people to examine it, adjust it, test it, resist it -- but ultimately embrace it."

Rove pointed to the legacies that presidents pick up from the institutions designed by their predecessors in a recent event in Arkansas to offer more evidence for his claim. Reflecting on his remarks for Abramowitz, he described the process as inevitable.



:wow:

Yeah, America is going to embrace being an aggressor nation in the name of capitalism....er....democracy.

Well, it might as long as Repukes retain power in the White House.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:10 AM
Response to Original message
1. The next President will be a criminal?
NGU.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deutsey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #1
27. Bush is the first in line of Emperor Criminals
ruling over the Pox (sic) Americana.

All Hail Bush.

:evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
64. rove is looking to
controlling the voting machines again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:11 AM
Response to Original message
2. Does this mean Rove is planning another ELECTION THEFT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Junkdrawer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Ya Think?
Watch for a Stealth Candidate like Hagel who is connected to the vote stealing machine, promotes himself as anti-war, then comes in and continues the neo-con agenda.

Remember: Bush touted himself as a "Compassionate Conservative."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
44. Yep, I agree Hagel and a DINO (Obviously not LIEberman, but I wouldn't
be surprised to find a DLCer join forces on the "Unity" Party that Hagel spoke of. It's power over principle with these folks. That is exactly why we need to push for verifiable and fair voting before another theft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drifter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah ... kind of like ...
his prediction for the November elections.

This is just more proof that he is seriously (to quote our favorite WH gay prostitute) divorced from reality.
He will be lucky to finish his term.

Cheers
Drifter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:19 AM
Response to Original message
5. suggest
people ask the crop of candidates (repubs and Dems) if they plan on adopting the bush doctrine

if they say yes, ask them to explain how they will manipulate, mislead and lie to invade a country
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dogday Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:20 AM
Response to Original message
6. Impeachment for two?
Anyone who follows that nut-case's Doctrine deserves no less than impeachment....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rasputin1952 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good Lord, this sounds like came right out of Mein Kampf...
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 11:22 AM by rasputin1952
The so-called Bush Doctrine of preemptive war, Rove said, "has a logic of force and nature and reality that will cause people to examine it, adjust it, test it, resist it -- but ultimately embrace it."



These people haven't a clue about Americans, all they've done is try to scare them to death, and that quote scares me close to death if this jerk thinks this is anywhere near true...:scared:

For God's sake, he's trying to make this a religion!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:58 AM
Response to Reply #7
21. What makes you think it didn't? Come on, it's Rove! Of course it did. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
8. WAR: The Republican corporate welfare system.
To hell with the American people, they can rot and die for all the GOP cares.

It's American big business that the Republicans are interested in helping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:22 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. Like the latest Forbes magazine shows: $3.5 trillion in wealth is held by only 946 people.
:wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
theoldman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. Even if John McCain becomes president he will be restrained by
the house and senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:23 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. What if the House and Senate turn Blood Red?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
11. Yeah, because this Iraq thing is working out so well...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #11
26. LOL... the "Bush Doctrine" has been a smashing success, hasn't it ?
W will go down in history alright, but not for the "success" of the Bush Doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
13. "Power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely." (Acton)
This is why it's imperative to impeach and remove ... and repudiate this abysmal corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
14. He may be right. That was the GOP plan all along: legacy.
This is why he isn't worried about legacy: it's already welded and tempered into the foreign policy mindset of so many people. We will have war for another 30-40 years, if Ted Koppel is right (this a.m. on PBS). Only it will involve the military "20%" of the time instead of "60%" as it is now. Some wag a few years back had it right: the GOP has given us PermaWAR (trademark?).

Note this: PermaWAR is structured around the "Patriot Acts" which have permanently weakened the Bill of Rights. And where do the Patriot Acts come from? Maybe someone out there can help out -- who was the Bushite who said: "I don't know why some are upset about the Patriot Act. We've been doing the same thing for years in the War on Drugs." Ahh, yes another topic mainmedia doesn't like to deal with except if it comes down from the ONDCP/DEA. Here's the formula, folks: PermaWAR abroad; authoritarianism at home. Baby, that's legacy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tridim Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
15. The * Doctrine of preemptive war "has a logic of force and nature and reality"
Can someone explain to me what that fascist fuck means by that? Logic of force?

Sounds to me like Rove is sharing Rush's stash.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Remember, neocons create their OWN reality--he makes perfect
sense in his own mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tin Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
28. It's nonsensical babble.
That's about all I can make of it. However, it probably makes perfect sense to Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #15
32. I think it means if a madman unleashes a global war with practically indescribable goals
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 12:22 PM by kenny blankenship
you're going to have a global war--and other madmen running it--for some time to come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerfectSage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #15
55. * Doctrine means that America has a big alpha male superpower penis...
...and all the beta male countries of the world have to submit, or else their territory will be invaded.

Or maybe it's just self righteous, law of the jungle/strong prey on the weak bullshit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mod mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #55
66. lol-awol cheerleader bu$h a big alpha male. All (gibberish) talk and no game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PerfectSage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:53 AM
Response to Reply #66
67. Yeah that sums up Bush. All bullshit, no game.
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 12:54 AM by PerfectSage
So clueless of human nature, if he was the only guy in a bar full of drunken, horny women, he still wouldn't get laid. :rofl: lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:32 AM
Response to Original message
16. "From Camelot to the Fourth Reich, From the Moon to the Mud:
The true story of the Bush legacy."

Being written as we speak.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
18. Is this the same Karl Rove that...
predicted a Republican sweep of the last election? :rofl:

Turdblossom ain't all that, and never was. The "boy genius" mystique only lives on in the hardcore Bushbot delusional circles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
19. Over my dead body!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
20. bush will be repudiated by history like Hitler. Rove is delusional
as well as evil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
22. Yeah, whatever. He said he had "THE numbers" on the last election, too.
He's yesterday's news. This little piggy is crying "wee wee wee" all the way home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mtnHov Donating Member (43 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
23. straight jackets and padded walls needed for those wingnuts
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
24. Um ever heard of 9/11?
I'm not on the LIHOP or MIHOP wagon either. In 10 years we will have looked back and asked the question that the special White House approved "can't find blame" bipartisan committee never even broached which is "How the hell did that happen ?"

Folye broke the day that Woodruff's claims were about to get the full treatment. Before that the media declared 9/11 Bush's greatest day (odd) but as we get further and further away we will look back and Bush legacy builders will be screaming and crying to turn the conversation over to the disasterous war on Iraq anything ANYTHING to get the heat off of him for 9/11.

"On his watch" is going to be the one that everyone will remember.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dubyaD40web Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
25. If that happens....
then the next President will embrace Bush's poll numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. This Needs to Be On T-Shirts, Bumper Stickers, EVERYWHERE!
Between August - November 2008.

Stick these words to the Republican candidate like glue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kenny blankenship Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
30. Don't suppose imperialism is just for Republicans...
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 12:16 PM by kenny blankenship
The United States is a global empire--not has an empire--it is an empire. I mean it can no longer be thought of separate from its empire. For the imperialists borders no longer exist: that's what GATT, NAFTA, CAFTA, WIPO etc are about, and that's also what Operation Iraqi Free-Drums was about. For you the ruled, borders most certainly still exist. To dollars and bombs however, borders are transparent.

We used to be a "cool" empire, rather than a hot empire. In a way similar to difference between cold war and hot war, we ruled coolly, more by the intimidation of "projecting power" and "securing favorable terms" than by outright displays of mass murder and exacting tribute in direct payments from the survivors, the way hot empires once did.
In acting so aggressively towards Iraq, though, Bush has made the cool empire hot. It is hot all over and it's going to stay hot even after we leave Iraq.
It's one thing to oppose aggressive "hot" imperialism and preemptive war when the empire is cool and a new conquest is proposed, but quite another thing to oppose preemptive war when the empire is on fire inside and out.

The most terrible thing about Bush's view of the world is that, like Hitler's view of the world as united in conspiracy against Germany, or like the self-starting General Ripper in Dr. Strangelove, it may prove to be a self-fulfilling prophecy. I think Bush has started a war that no one can stop, no matter how much we regret his acts and no matter how seriously unhinged we think he was to do it. Bush may have committed us to an arc of world history we can't climb back from no matter how mistaken we think he was. Empires engender hatred and resistance whether they're hot empires or cool: we have struck a match in the gas station of the world igniting that resistance. The world's temper is flaring at us now--to whom can we apologize? How do you say uh yes we've been stepping on your neck, but we'd like to stop now because it's clear we've stomped a bit too hard. We're awfully sorry can we just go back to the way it was before? Who takes an apology like that even if you're willing to give it?

I will always be on the side of the peaceniks, as I was before all this Bushlerian madness began, but I expect that just as it was Bill Clinton who signed the Iraq Liberation Act of 1998 and made "regime change" in Baghdad the official US policy, the Democratic Party will find itself wedded to a military-first foreign policy after 2008 and after a brief fling with anti-imperialism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JerseygirlCT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:16 PM
Response to Original message
31. Does this read like "the fix is already in for 2008" to anyone else? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Count Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
33. Why call it Bush doctrine and not Hitler doctrine? Looky at this nice quote:

"I give a propaganda reason for starting the war. Never mind whether it is plausible or not. The
victor will not be asked afterward whether he told the truth or not. In starting and waging war it
is not right that matters, but victory."

Adolph Hitler
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guruoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
34. Sounds familar...
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 12:23 PM by guruoo
"The aide said that guys like me were 'in what we call the reality-based community,'
which he defined as people who 'believe that solutions emerge from your judicious
study of discernible reality.' " The aide told Mr. Suskind, "That's not the way the
world really works anymore. We're an empire now, and when we act we create our own reality.
And while you're studying that reality -- judiciously, as you will -- we'll act again,
creating other new realities, which you can study too, and that's how things will sort out.
We're history's actors . . . and you, all of you, will be left to just study what we do.''"

http://http//www.nytimes.com/2004/10/17/magazine/17BUSH.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bunny planet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
35. Gotta wonder what these people are planning that would make anyone want
to 'embrace' any policy of the Pretzel Emperor. More like forced to embrace it because the whole world at that point will be planning to attack us due to Jr.'s criminal doctrine.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Czolgosz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:26 PM
Response to Original message
36. When Rover refers to "the next president" he's speaking of Romney. Rove spent his career building
fundamentalist-corporatist-neocon coalition. Rove's coalition of one-issue-voters demands unity because their success at achieving better unity than we achieve is the key factor (along with a little help from election riggers) which allows them to succeed despite the fact that they hold minority views. Guiliani threatens that unity (Southern fundamentalists won't get on board). McCain threatens that unity (neither the fundamentalists nor the corporatist-neocons trust him and Rove thinks McCain is too old).

The corporatist-neocons love Romney and so Rove is betting that the fundamentalists will eventually become comfortable with Romney as a "Christian" notwithstanding the skepticism that Romney's Mormon faith is considered a "cult" by many fundamentalist Christians because they will have no choice given that they distrust Guiliani and McCain more than they distrust Mormonism (Rove is hoping that neither Huckabee nor Brownback catches fire with the fundamentalists - watch FauxNoise spin the "unelectability" of these two candidates in the coming months).

What if Rove is wrong and Romney wins the nomination but then loses? That sets up Jeb '12.

The Bush family and their consigliere Rove are working full tilt to position Romney as the inevitable Repub nominee. Count on it happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:31 PM
Response to Original message
37. There won't be any future presidents if KKKarl has anything to say about it.
Either we'll have an emperor for life or we'll get the whole damn planet blown up if KKKarl gets his way.

Luckily, I don't think the slimy pig will be getting his way much longer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dave29 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:32 PM
Response to Original message
38. these are not the droids you are looking for
lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:34 PM
Response to Original message
39. Why does this rat bastard still have a security clearance?
Why are WE, THE PEOPLE, STILL PAYING HIS SALARY? I want his ASS OUT! Now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 12:38 PM
Response to Original message
40. He also predicted republicans gaining seats in 06
It's his way of trying to project his wanted reality.
Roves m.o.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
41. Sure Karl, this has been such a spectacular success! Why Not?
Pretty cocky from a shit who should be in jail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pat_k Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:27 PM
Response to Original message
42. "Clearing, Holding, and Building" their way to a Unitary Authoritarian Executive.
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 01:31 PM by pat_k
This is not about the covert actions of one administration.

Bush and Cheney are "clearing, holding, and building" their way to a unitary authoritarian executive with unlimited power.

They are playing for keeps, which is WHY they are breaking the Constitution in plain sight.

They do something we have forbidden, claim it is not forbidden, and dare Members of Congress to stop them. When Congress refuses to impeach -- the ONLY thing capable of stopping them -- Bush and Cheney "hold and build": **Hey America, told you it wasn't forbidden. Now, let us get on with clearing habeas (or whatever takes our fancy) out of our way.**

Members of Congress who are refusing to publicly accuse them and demand impeachment are in full retreat. The ONLY way to challenge them is to stand their ground and point the ONLY loaded weapo in the Congressional arsenal-- impeachment -- at them.

Impeachment is not about "getting" Bush and Cheney. It is about defending our against an invaders hell-bent on occupying our "territory" (the inviolate dictates and institutions we have established in our common contract -- the Constitution of the United States. They seek to destroy the framework through which we assign duties and delegate powers to our government officials. They violate the inviolate dictates and institutions through which we balance conflicting interests in accord with our common values. Above all, they are after the principle that government power can only be derived from the consent of the governed -- the SOLE moral principle on which our Constitution, and therefore the nation, rests.

A single member can call us to arms by simply standing their ground and accusing/impeaching. (It's easy. Write articles on a piece of paper and introduce them. Speak out in public. As truth spreads, so to does the urgency.

The choice, To Impeach, or Not Impeach, is not some strategic game or academic exercise. It is a choice between living by American principle or Facist Principle.

It is that simple.

There really is no choice.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:13 PM
Response to Reply #42
50. How else to keep the BFEE / Military-Industrial Complex beast fed given its insatiable appetite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
43. What a sick SOB comment
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 01:34 PM by alyce douglas
he would have been "embraced" with Nazi Germany with that remark, what a sick man
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
45. More likely he'll sign Karl's extradition papers to the Hague. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dulcinea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
46. Suppose the next President is a Democrat?
Will he/she still support perpetual war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RestoreGore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #46
56. Aren't they now the longer Bush is in the White House? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ananda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
47. NO president should embrace that doctrine!
But we don't have a president. We have an installed dictator
supported by big business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProfessorGAC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
48. Yeah, Like Embracing A Wolf Around The Neck
So he can't rip your lungs out.
The Professor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
49. Well... I guess thats one way to describe getting screwed... -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
michaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:31 PM
Response to Original message
51. Is it contagious?
Is it possible that being delusional is contagious?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lovuian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
52. Scoot over Monroe we have the Bush Doctrine
it makes me ill
:argh:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
53. I hate to agree with him
if we are an Empire, and we are boys and girls, this is IMPERIAL POLICY

So unless we divest from Empire, and no Empire on Earth has done such voluntarily... he is essentially correct... and we crossed the Rubicon on December 12, 2000... look, on the bright side Historians will have the exact date
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 02:40 PM
Response to Original message
54. And "embracing the Bush doctrine" means...
Embracing the Saudis!



Now, remember, you promised! I let you fly planes into the WTC so we can invade Iraq!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roland99 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #54
58. A lot of truth to that. Esp. since Saudis are *still* funding the insurgency in Iraq.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saltpoint Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
57. Mr. Rove is mistaken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fovea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 06:02 PM
Response to Original message
59. My prediction Karl
Your legacy will end up hanging from a light pole.

You will be seen as pivotal a figure in US politics as Goebbles was to Germany's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 06:08 PM
Response to Original message
60. it's actually better known as the "hitler doctrine"
or perhaps the "napoleon doctrine", if you're feeling less provocative.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
61. Bush Doctrine = total failure
So let's extrapolate that for a minute - does this mean the next president who embraces the "Bush Doctrine" will be a total failure as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Worst Username Ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 08:39 PM
Response to Original message
62. Yeah, the next President. Whoever she is.
:P I made a funny
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 08:40 PM
Response to Original message
63. There goes rove again with that
gin-hazed crystal ball of his.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
65. Sure thing, pal.
Nothing convinces like TOTAL COMPLETE ABSOLUTE FAILURE AND DEVASTATION. :sarcasm:

I actually find it encouraging that Rove and the rest of Bushco can't figure out that their bullshit is no longer selling. They are digging their own grave.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC