madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Journal Click to send private message to this author Click to view this author's profile Click to add this author to your buddy list Click to add this author to your Ignore list Fri Feb-23-07 01:53 PM
Original message
Once again our party is catering to the other side against our grassroots. Updated at 11:53 AM
Edited on Fri Feb-23-07 01:56 PM by madfloridian
Hardcore Fox viewers in Nevada can very easily turn the dial to another station if they really want to hear Democrats. We do not have to cater to them. Now the MoveOn action is negated, Robert Greenwald's Fox Attack is negated...all because our Democrats have to pander to Fox Viewers. There are others groups as well, and I get mail from all of them.
I don't like Dean going along with this. I wonder though if now our party is becoming rather obligated to Murdoch. We know Hillary had a fundraiser with him, or was planning one. Who else did?
http://www.mydd.com/story/2007/2/23/111323/979"The reason, according to an online letter MoveOn sent to 2 million of its members Thursday, is that "Fox is a mouthpiece for the Republican Party, not a legitimate news channel. The Democratic Party of Nevada should drop Fox as its partner for the presidential primary debate." Joining the chorus Thursday was liberal filmmaker Robert Greenwald, the director of the anti-Fox film, "Outfoxed," who released a video online of Fox's coverage of Democratic candidates.
But the Nevada party organizers -- and Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean -- said Thursday that while they may not think much of Fox's reporting, they want to reach out to viewers of the largest cable news network, one with double the number of prime-time viewers of CNN. And one whose believability is much higher with Republicans than Democrats, according to a 2005 study by the Project for Excellence in Journalism."
Here is Move On's Take on Fox action:
http://civ.moveon.org/foxdebate /
Here is Greenwald's Fox Attacks:
http://foxattacks.com:80 /
There are other networks to use. Let them turn the dial if they care.
Here is more, and I disagree with Dean on this firmly.
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/200..."This is about talking to voters, not a network," Dean said Thursday. "While the Fox News Channel rarely has coverage that is fair and balanced, we believe that Fox viewers, who are potential voters, should have the opportunity to see a debate between our candidates. These forums provide an important unfiltered opportunity for potential voters to see Democrats without the bias of the network."
No, unfortunately it will not be an unfiltered view. Right after the 03 debates they switched to Bill Bennett to tear down the Democrats.