Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sex In School

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ls317 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 05:41 PM
Original message
Sex In School
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 05:42 PM by ls317
http://www.wthr.com/global/Story.asp?s=6180780

Indianapolis - For months it's been a well-kept secret. But now Warren Township Schools confirm a disturbing case of sex in the classroom. The illicit activity has parents concerned and a district at a loss for words.

Shop class gives students a chance to learn outside of the book. But at Warren Township's Raymond Park Middle School, two students engaged in illicit acts in view of goggled eyes.

13 Investigates was tipped off by a disturbed resident who writes:

"...during school hours in a classroom with an experienced teacher present, two sixth graders completed the act of intercourse...at least ten students were witnesses. No disciplinary actions were taken against the teacher... All teachers were told to keep quiet."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jollyreaper2112 Donating Member (955 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 06:03 PM
Response to Original message
1. wow
And I remember when "smokin' in the boys room" was subversive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. My initial reaction...
...was "Gee, why couldn't they have had shop classes like that when I was taking them?" :evilgrin:

Then, of course, I remembered that, back then, shop classes were boys-only, while the girls all had to go learn how to be perfect homemakers in HomeEc. :-(

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
2. your post is misleading
From the article:

Associate Superintendent Jeff Swensson told Eyewitness News off camera the teacher didn't know what was going on because another student acted as a "look-out." But once the teacher discovered the behavior, immediate action was taken. Swensson says the students involved were recommended for expulsion. But he did not say whether the board followed that recommendation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ls317 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. How so???
Warren Township Schools confirm a disturbing case of sex in the classroom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. you editing implies that this was somehow encouraged or promoted by the teacher
that there is a coverup of the event entirely, and that the teacher deserves to be fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
regnaD kciN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:54 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yes, and the feedback on that web site...
...is very strongly in favor of firing the teacher, if not the entire administration, and/or pulling your kids out of public school and homeschooling them. :eyes:

I don't want to downplay the seriousness of the situation, but there's a lot of room here for knee-jerk reactions, rumor, and hearsay. Did the incident happen in a place where the teacher should have been able to notice what was going on (in other words, was he being lazy and unobservant, or was there a hidden corner or corridor in the shop where he couldn't have been expected to see it)? Other than that, it seems like the incident was handled in about the same way other kinds of major disciplinary infractions would have been, once they had been discovered. The only judgment call here appears to have been the administration's decision to handle such discipline quietly, with the students and their families being the only ones notified, rather than issuing an immediate press release and making it a public issue from day one. From the reactions on that web site, it appears that the latter course would have been what most of the public would have preferred...and a good reason, IMHO, why it wasn't chosen.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC