Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The New Gen X Manifesto?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:57 PM
Original message
The New Gen X Manifesto?
http://www.forbes.com/books/2008/08/14/slackonomics-economics-millennials-oped-books-cx_rl_0814bookreview.html

Between the nostalgia factory controlled by the baby boomers, constantly mythologizing and glorifying the idealistic 1960s, and the Twittering/Facebooking of the millennials, little room is left for the group that brought us Nirvana, My So-Called Life and flannel shirts as a non-fashion statement.

"Gen X has turned 40 with nobody noticing!" goes the theme, though not quite. While this specific milestone may have gone by without fireworks (but with a fair amount of articles and books), there have been vague rumblings of an X takeover in the zeitgeist. Knocked Up director Judd Apatow has made slackerdom cool again; rock band Sonic Youth is playing at fashion shows; and Barack Obama, though unlikely to refer to himself as an "Xer," is threatening the boomers' long monopoly of the White House."


More at link...

:P

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Gen X'ers can have the WH
Though I'm far from convinced they'll be any better. It isn't the generation; it's the corruption.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
2. Obama is Generation Jones
We watched the boomers and learned from their mistakes. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #2
5.  i wish the boomers
would be remembered for the grateful dead, being right about drugs, jfk, and not the likes of schrub:hippie: :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. No kidding.
Owsley was my hero.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
3. "The boomers long monopoly of the White House"?
Uh, all two of 'em?

Bonus news flash: Born in 1961, Obama is a boomer.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DailyGrind51 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Obama could have joined a big law firm or become legal counsel
for a "Fortune 500" company and make $millions, but he opted to become a community organizer and enter politics. He really seems like he wants to do good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Gen X is '61-'81. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terry in Austin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. 1964
There seems to be some debate about the first Gen-X year, ranging from 1961 to 1965. Strauss & Howe favor 1961, but you see a lot of pop-culture demographics type articles in the media that pick 1964.

Of course, drawing a clear-cut boundary for something as gradual as a generational shift is a little arbitrary.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:16 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah, it really shouldn't be down to specific years but a range of experiences.
Obama, for instance, fits the profile of a Gen X'er based on his own writing and quotes, not to mention his personal story. More recently marketing companies have broadened the X'er demographic from the oddly short 1965-1978 to something more in line with the Boomers: 1961-1981.

What's interesting is that if you go back and look at the earlier articles about Obama (early 2007) you'll see more references to his being a "post-Boomer" or a "Gen X'er," but those references dwindled as soon as he became more popular and especially when he started leading in the primaries.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. What's Pepsi have to say about it??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lumberjack_jeff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. It may be squishy from a cultural standpoint.
But from a population standpoint "the baby boom" ended in 1964 with the widespread adoption of the birth control pill.

As originally intended, it's not arbitrary at all. The baby boom was the period of high birthrates after WWII.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Strauss and Howe based their choice of years '61-'81 not simply because of birth rates...
but because of cultural influences, as well. Here's a blurb from wikipedia:

The generation receives its name because it's the 13th to know the flag of the United States (counting back to the peers of Benjamin Franklin). Strauss and Howe defined the birth years of the 13th Generation as 1961 to 1981 based on examining peaks and troughs in cultural trends rather than simply looking at birth rates.<1> Howe and Strauss speak of six influences that they believe have shaped Generation 13. These influences are as follows

* Readily-accessible birth control
* Legalization of abortion on demand
* Increase in divorce
* Increase in mothers in the work place
* The Zero Population movement
* "Devil-child films"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
supernova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
4. "Creative destruction," I like it.
:-)

and I agree. What boomer monopoly on the WH? There's only been Big Dog and GW. And if blech, they win, McSame is a Korean war era person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
7. The media is a little late, the oldest Xers (born in '61) turned 40 7 years ago.
IMO there is an interesting generational similarity between Obama, who was born in 1961 (the first Xer birth year) and FDR, who was born in 1882 (what I consider the first birth year of the so-called "Lost" Generation. The Lost Generation has so many similarities with Generation X it's scary, and the "Muck-racker" generation that came before the Lost Generation was a lot like the Boomers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. That's what Gen X is here for: to fix stuff...
... until another cohort blows through here and messes it all up again. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
14. I was born in 1972.....I'm chronically GenX.
..... I think I'll put on my flannel shirt before sipping my latte.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. I post on this issue a lot...
and every time I do, I always assume that people are tired of reading this material; however, I'm taken aback by how many respond and seem interested in discussing this topic. It's like a Gen X Coming Out Party.

BTW: 1975 for me. :)`
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:04 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC