Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Don't you love it when Republicans start comparing sins? (My sin wasn't as bad as your sin

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
journalist3072 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:06 PM
Original message
Don't you love it when Republicans start comparing sins? (My sin wasn't as bad as your sin
Edited on Fri Mar-09-07 10:09 PM by journalist3072
So this evening I heard a soundbite of Newt Gingrich and his I HAVE SINNED moment on James Dobson's show.

And he justified standing in judgement of President Clinton's relationship with Monica Lewinsky, WHILE he was having his own extracurricular activites, by saying that he may have had an affair, but he didn't lie about it under oath.

Oh, okay....I guess it's ok to cheat on your wife, as long as you don't have to testify about it in a court of law?

A few things stand out at me. One, you see Republicans like Gingrich trying to compare sins....Oh, I was bad, but this person was worse.

Secondly, you see them trying to say that the Clinton impeachment was not about sex, but about lying under oath. Make no mistake about it, the Clinton impeachment was all about sex and nothing but.

Just read the Starr report. See how many times the word cigar is mentioned, vs. the number of times Whitewater is mentioned. It's a 9 to 1 ratio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
cyberpj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
1. Lately it's all been "my perjury isn't as bad as your perjury" so pardon me. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SharonAnn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
2. He's one who encouraged the whole thing that led to the "perjury trap".
Newt is sick.

Newt is guilty.

Newt is out talking about the loss of civility in government. That "loss of civility" really got a good start from newt and his "talking points" about Democrats and Clinton. He's the one who led the charge and taught others how to do it. He's the one who was relentless in name-calling and insulting the Democrats and Clinton.

Newt is a hypocrite of the first order.

Newt is a HUGE hypocrite.

Newt is a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. But, but but, the republican apologist on the Diane Rehm show today
suggested that all politicians are hypocrites.

No Communist infiltrator ever did more to destroy confidence in our government than the current crop of Republicans!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bumblebee1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. If hypocrisy were an Olympic sport,
Newt would win the gold medal hands down.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. He didn't under lie oath because he wasn't put under oath.
Nice logical fallacy he's got going there.

Wouldn't matter, he's a Republican...he'd lie anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
5. My grandmother and I were setting on the front porch one Sunday
morning when the Baptists emerged from their church service. They were screaming and yelling at each other because the fundie preacher had preached about the sheep and the goats/saints and sinners. They were doing exactly what you described. Almost came to physical blows. "Well, you drink." "And you smoke." It was indeed the moment that I decided never to belong to that church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-09-07 11:54 PM
Response to Original message
6. It's the theory of being 'born again' ...
... and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again and again ...

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
magellan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:20 AM
Response to Original message
7. Newt and the Repukes must think we all have faulty memories
They were investigating Clinton long before he testified under oath about not having sex with "that woman". Up till then it was only about throwing shit until it stuck, and his personal life was where they got him.

(And then Bush** campaigned on restoring "integrity" and "family values"! :rofl:)

Newt may think he's very clever coming out now with his confession of an affair while he was on Clinton's back for the same thing, but he'd be wise to remember that Clinton's support grew during the Lewinsky scandal, while the Repug Congress suffered in the polls. Admitting he's a hypocrite isn't impressing the majority of Americans...it's angering them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hfojvt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 12:47 AM
Response to Original message
8. I wish they would compare
Back in the 2004 campaign, the local media would take a huge lie of the Bush campaign and then find a tiny error made by the Kerry campaign, and then say 'neither side was telling the truth all the time'. As Krugman said, it was like comparing a mass murderer to a jaywalker and saying that 'both are criminals'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 01:22 AM
Response to Original message
10. Right.
Before I retired, I used to work a lot with people with addiction issues. One of my more experienced co-workers taught me early on that one sign that people were still active in their illness, and not really in recovery, was if they were prone to saying, approximately, "Yeah, my substance abuse isn't good, but it sure as heck isn't as bad as _______."

Your point about the republican comparisons (Newt's affair wasn't good, but it wasn't as bad as Clinton's; and Scooter's perjury wasn't good, but it wasn't as bad as Clinton's) would seem grand examples of illness in action.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC