Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

EDITORIAL: Meltdown over Fox

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:33 PM
Original message
EDITORIAL: Meltdown over Fox
"Faux noise had this on thier webpage"

EDITORIAL: Meltdown over Fox

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2007/Mar-10-Sat-2007/opinion/13078877.html

EDITORIAL: Meltdown over Fox

Network co-sponsors state Democratic debate -- oh my!

Hard-core liberals can't stand the Fox News Channel. Passing a television that's tuned to the conservative favorite forces many of them to close their eyes, cover their ears and scream, "La la la la la la la la la!" Then they dash to their computers and fire off 2,500 e-mails condemning the outlet, none of which are ever read.

But liberals' aversion to Fox News has finally gone over the top. The Nevada Democratic Party had agreed to let the right-tilting network co-sponsor, of all things, an August debate in Reno between Democratic presidential candidates. Party officials were serious about drawing national attention to the state's January presidential caucus, the country's second in the 2008 nominating process. What better way for the party to reach conservative and "values" voters who might consider changing allegiances?



But the socialist, Web-addicted wing of the Democratic Party was apoplectic. The prospect of having to watch Fox News to see their own candidates would have been torture in itself. So they set the blogosphere aflame with efforts to kill the broadcast arrangement, or at least have all the candidates pull out of the event. Before Friday, the opportunistic John Edwards was the only candidate to jump on that bandwagon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
brettdale Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. contact
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 04:34 PM by brettdale
FAX -- (702) 383-4676
Mail -- P.O. Box 70, Las Vegas, NV 89125
letters@reviewjournal.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Seems like this editorial is looking into the mirror and seeing its own apoplexy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Xipe Totec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
3. Somebody call a WHAAAAAAAMBULANCE! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mick Knox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. lol my thoughts as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GCP Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I gather this must be a right-wing site?
It's as "fair and balanced" as Faux itself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #4
17. Largest newspaper in Vegas
The Democratic base of Nevada. *sigh*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:36 PM
Response to Original message
5. There's a reason we call them "FAUX"
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mojambo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
7. Web-Addicted Socialist
I love it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rockholm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
23. I love it too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ray of light Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. and Fox is so 'balanced" that they're willing to let Air America
moderate with them.

Besides, socialist? I'm a socialist? Clearly that person doesn't know what that word is!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
9. Where does one start...
With a piece of tripe like this? Did someone sneak into the place in the middle of the night and post this, or is this typical of their output. Moreover, if this is typical, and people line their birdcages with this rag, are they in danger of getting charged with animal cruelty?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnnInLa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:51 PM
Response to Original message
10. Perhaps they would like the Republic debates on AAR?
I'm sure our Dem candidates would have reached thousands and thousands of those loyal faux viewers...and magically opened their hearts & minds.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. "Hardcore" liberals? Socialists? Are they the same as "extreme" or "far" leftists?
We're not far left--we just look that way because they're so far right! And if we're "web-addicted," it's because we can't find the fairness and balance we need in other on televison or radio.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:54 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Then again...
some people whine because they think that others standing up for themselves is whining.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HappyWeasel Donating Member (694 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:52 PM
Response to Original message
12. So, this guy whines when people tries to stand up for themselves?
This guy is a bonafide crybaby hillbilly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Peace Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:54 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha! Ha!
:rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DefenseLawyer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
15. Socialist? Addict?
I prefer pinko commie or deviated prevert, thank you very much.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. Fox is as biased as Comedy Central
That's the point. The difference is, Comedy Central doesn't profess to be a news outlet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FVZA_Colonel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
18. "right-tilting"
Me thinks this is a mild way of puting it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
19. Conserding Fox's extremely biased moderating of the debates in 2004
and the way they constantly ambush and outnumber and shout down Democrats on their "news" programs, its amazing Democrats even speak to anyone representing Fox News.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
UTUSN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:43 PM
Response to Original message
20. What Faux fan, committed enough to watch a debate, would "change allegiances"?
Oh, and Faux ONLY "tilts Right" but Dems are SOCIALISTS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KharmaTrain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:45 PM
Response to Original message
21. How Would Repugnicans Like Their Debates On BET
or Bravo...ya know networks that cater to "non-Amuricans".

The "values voters" long gave up on Faux...between their constant bloodlust for Iraq or another dead blonde...the typical Faux viewer is today's modern freak show. Yeah, Democrats really need to reach these "voters".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. Ummm.... if none of the 2,500 emails were read, how do these
"Web-addicted socialists" pull off such a coup?

:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC