Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

BushInc didn't maintain Walter Reed because it's worth BILLIONS for developers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:51 PM
Original message
BushInc didn't maintain Walter Reed because it's worth BILLIONS for developers.
Remember when Rumsfeld's Pentagon submitted their intention to close it a couple years ago?


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/05/22/AR2005052200739.html?nav=rss_opinion/columns

No Scarcity Of Suitors For Walter Reed Site
Complex Is Coveted For Its Location, Size
By Dana Hedgpeth
Washington Post Staff Writer
Monday, May 23, 2005; Page E01


The Pentagon's proposal to close Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Northwest Washington could touch off intense competition for a rare prize: more than 100 acres in a city where real estate values are soaring and space for new development is scarce.

Barely a week after the Pentagon said it planned to close the 96-year-old hospital between Rock Creek Park and Georgia Avenue, real estate brokers, D.C. planners, developers and politicians were laying claim to the property, a sign of the complicated discussions that ensue when the federal government pulls up stakes.

The 113-acre complex is in the middle of an increasingly affluent neighborhood convenient to downtown and also is near the burgeoning commercial area of Silver Spring -- factors that argue for dense residential, retail or office development. But it is also a historic place, where war heroes and presidents have recuperated, and its redevelopment could trigger a preservation fight. And as a federal property, its decommissioning as a military hospital would be governed by tight restrictions, such as that the campus must first be offered to other government agencies.

D.C. officials and neighborhood residents also would want a say.

"What's attractive about Walter Reed is its size," said Thomas R. Maskey, a senior vice president at Peterson Cos., a Northern Virginia developer of mixed-use projects. "There's not 113 acres anywhere around here that's going to be available. The size allows you to do a lot of different things that can really have an impact."

With congressional review of the Pentagon's base-closing plan ahead, it could be years before Walter Reed closes, and it may not happen at all if local officials succeed in blocking the proposed transfer of hospital staff to the National Naval Medical Center in Bethesda and Fort Belvoir in Fairfax County. And it could take years more before a plan for the property took shape.

>>>>>>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. So, screw the soldiers, but pad the pockets of his cronies some more. I
wonder if the land would have been awarded to some entity w/o competition. Nothing would surprise me, but I'd say this is bordering on criminal. Were there any significant plans to replace WR with another, better facility? Now I'm more convinced than ever that Walter Reed needs to be saved for the soldiers, not developers.
Good find, blm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. Now we know where Bush's priorities were all along.
And to think that the right-wing thought he was a better patriot than Al Gore or Kerry. Bush is a total sell-out to every American ideal, except capitalism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 04:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. 2011. It's built like a frigging fort, too. Even if they tore down the
buildings (and some of them are historic, that would be a shame) the foundations, especially on the main facility are solid as can be. Seriously, it's like a fallout shelter down there.

I am a traditionalist. I think it is wrong to close that facility. It has a lot of history, it is convenient to ANDREWS (and we know the drill with the wounded by now, don't we?) and while it isn't the newest facility in the firmament, it really is well built, and it is amenable to updates--many of the walls are moveable--they anticipated the requirement to change space sizes and fucntions. The rehab area ten years ago was tiny; now they've taken over spaces and made it huge.

If they don't want to keep it, they should give it to the VA, or make it a dual-use facility (VA and regional military medical facility). There's certainly no shortage of customers who will benefit from keeping it open.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The emergency war room - before the Greenbriar - was at WRAMC.
So, it IS built like a fallout shelter.

Two problems:

1) Many of the buildings are considered historic.
2) There is not enough room to accommodate the extra facilities and, most important of all, the extra traffic the extra patients and employees would generate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Well, that big lawn in the front? It ain't a lawn. There's a huge parking
facility underneath it that goes deep and could go deeper. And no reason they can't do like Bethesda--build UP. Before the war, that place never was full. Many patients came in by bus; some from senior facilities that were geared to military retirees, others on public transportation. WRAMC ran a bus, too, that picked people up here and there around DC and dumped them back off again.

They were splitting the diff with Bethesda, with each facility taking on what they did best, and not duplicating--if they continued along those lines, they could do some good medicine. Hell, even get the NIH campus (across from Bethesda) into the game--some of THOSE facilities aren't fully utilized of late. And those are good facilities, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. You hit the nail on the head. There isn't that much duplication, so this move...
makes limited sense.

WRAMC is very busy when I go there to donate platelets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. Now, it's a beehive of activity. After Gulf One, and before this mess,
it was 'busy' but not overwhelming. You could always find a parking spot, the wait for care wasn't onerous. Now, it's a frigging madhouse--the few times I have been by, the lobby was packed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donnachaidh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. Do you really think a building with *history* means a tinker's damn to Bush?
They see dollar signs. That's all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MADem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:58 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. No, but fortunately, he will be gone before the closing date, so there is still hope. NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
durtee librul Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
5. And again folks, I direct
your attention to the soldier's home at 3700 N Capitol St NW. Wanna talk about a plum site for developers? Google it on google earth once and you will see what I mean.

Newtie and gang wanted it for a private senate resort - the repukes wanted to sell it under Clinton (he didn't let them)

And now Bush has 'sold' it to a Catholic University. Wonder who really did get the $$ from that 'sale?'

There would be a story for some enterprising reporter.....

WRH is just the tip of crime, believe me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 05:58 PM
Response to Original message
7. Privatization is a Trojan horse
Time to look again at the "we hate government" neocons. It usually translates to, "We want the tax dollars to line our own pockets."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bonito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:21 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
9. The evil infecting our nation is unspeakable.
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 06:06 PM by shance
Please God help the troops and other victims of this predatory psychopathology.

Is nothing sacred to this greed mongers?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. "The love of money is the root of all evil" (1 Timothy 6:10)
Edited on Sat Mar-10-07 06:18 PM by TahitiNut
It's been true for thousands of years.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC