Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

US Invasion Of Iraq Explained In A Single Picture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 08:31 PM
Original message
US Invasion Of Iraq Explained In A Single Picture
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 09:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's the cross of changes


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-R9ulGK5nU8&eurl=

Silent Warrior


Long ago, for many years
White men came in the name of god
They took their land, they took their lives
A new age has just begun

They lost their gods, they lost their smile
They cried for help for the last time.
Liberty was turning into chains
But all the white men said
That's the cross of changes

In the name of God - the fight for gold
These were the changes.
Tell me - is it right - in the name of god
These kind of changes ?

They tried to fight for liberty
Without a chance in hell, they gave up.
White men won in the name of god
With the cross as alibi

There's no God who ever tried
To change the world in this way.
For the ones who abuse his name
Therell be no chance to escape
On judgement day

In the name of God - the fight for gold
These were the changes.
Tell me - is it right - in the name of god
These kind of changes ?

Tell me why, tell me why, tell why
The white men said:
That's the cross of changes ?

Tell me why, tell me why, tell why,
In the name of god
These kind of changes
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. That isn't cool.
As a former Marine I find that offensive. As a matter of fact, what gives you the right to deface a historic photograph showing one of our victories in the Pacific during world war two? You seem to think that photograph came cheap.

Of the over 22,000 Japanese soldiers, 20,703 died, and 216 were captured. The Allied forces suffered 25,281 casualties, with 5,598 deaths. This was the only large engagement of WWII in which the Allied forces suffered more casualties (dead plus injured) than their Japanese opponents.
Over a quarter of the Medals of Honor awarded to Marines in World War II were given for conduct in the invasion of Iwo Jima. The Marines, both active duty and reservists, were commended with 22 Medals of Honor.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Big Pappa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:42 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Thank you
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:46 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. roger that
semper fi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seemslikeadream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. I'm sorry but THIS is not cool either
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/object/article?o=11&f=/c/a/2006/03/29/MNSOLDIERS29.DTL





War without end / The Army gave Sgts. Michael Buyas and Brent Bretz direction and self-respect. After they were wounded, they fought a second war to rebuild their broken bodies and reconnect with their families
There's no whining at Walter Reed, the wounded soldiers say: There's always somebody worse off than you. Sgt. Jay Fondren (left) lost both his legs a month before Michael (right) and had been in rehab for almost a year by the time Michael returned from a home leave last summer. Wearing shoes backward on amputated stumps is an early balancing exercise. Chronicle photo by Deanne Fitzmaurice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wcross Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. The men in the flag raising photograph are long dead.
Yes, the photo you provided would be more appropriate to the current situation. Mocking men that fought many years ago in another war during different times is inappropriate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jcrowley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. From A Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Recipient USMC [Retired]
WAR IS A RACKET

by Two-Time Congressional Medal of Honor Recipient:

Major General Smedley D. Butler, USMC

Chapter One

WAR IS A RACKET

WAR is a racket. It always has been.

It is possibly the oldest, easily the most profitable, surely the most vicious. It is the only one international in scope. It is the only one in which the profits are reckoned in dollars and the losses in lives.

A racket is best described, I believe, as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small "inside" group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.

<snip>

For a great many years, as a soldier, I had a suspicion that war was a racket; not until I retired to civil life did I fully realize it. Now that I see the international war clouds gathering, as they are today, I must face it and speak out.

<snip>

Yes, they are getting ready for another war. Why shouldn't they? It pays high dividends.


The World War, rather our brief participation in it, has cost the United States some $52,000,000,000. Figure it out. That means $400 to every American man, woman, and child. And we haven't paid the debt yet. We are paying it, our children will pay it, and our children's children probably still will be paying the cost of that war.

<snip>

http://www.lexrex.com/enlightened/articles/warisaracket.htm

And yes I know which "World War" we are dealing with that "war to end all wars" until the next war...which is now:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piedmont Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-10-07 11:14 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. False dichotomy. Cheapening one soldier's service does not equal saving another one from war. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC