Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NONE of the possible Dem 08 nominees would have started the Iraq War

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:34 PM
Original message
NONE of the possible Dem 08 nominees would have started the Iraq War
If they voted for the Iraq War Resolution OR haven't subsequently called for an immediate withdrawl, that is a DIFFERENT question from whether they would have started the war if they were in Idiot Son's postion. None of them would.

Back when they voted for the IWR Democrats were in danger of losing MORE seats to Repukes because the country was still believing Idiot Son's bullshit.

LOSING MORE SEATS would probably mean we would not have won majorities in 06 and the situation now would be much worse than it is. Some DUers think that would be fine. BULL SHIT.

Anyone who says they would sit out 08 or vote third party if we get Hillary or whoever else has announced is a fucking Repuke tool.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. so are you justifying voting for the resolution for political reasons?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. yup nt
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ManWroteTheBible Donating Member (68 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. If it's what gave Dems the majority...
however slow the process, absolutely! It's called playing their (Repukes) game better than they do. Give "Little Fredo Nero" enough rope to hang not only himself, but his entire administation. We (most DUers) knew the intelligence Bush, et al, presented was bullshit... probably a large number of Dem senators and reps knew it too.. however, the morans , you know, the ones who voted for " * " in the first place, were too stupid to question the cherry-picked intelligence. The media was too busy rah rah-ing for war and slobbering over the shrub. I don't know about where you live, but here in Texas (part of Dumbfuckistan) I am one of very few that I knew who thinks for himself/herself. I still know people who think Tom DeLay is innocent! When you're dealing with that kind of blind devotion, no dissenting Dem stands a chance. And Texas is just one state in Dumbfuckistan. Now the fog seems to be lifting - even with my slow-to-wake-up fellow Texans. I don't have a problem with the Dems in congress that approved the war. I do have a problem with those who espouse "The Surge".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:47 PM
Response to Original message
2. Invading Iraq was *'s biggest mistake
I doubt any of the 08 pukes would have done it either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Good point. Regardless of their prominence in this administration , there are
really are precious few NeoCons.

Thank goodness.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pocoloco Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:48 PM
Response to Original message
3. You don't fuckin know that!!!
And how many lives is a seat worth??

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. About 655,000 according to some estimates. But, it's just "practical politics".
I'm unimpressed by the belated handwringing and "duh, I wuz fooled" excuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. How many lives is "voting on principle" (helping elect a RePUKE) worth?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
4. Is that supposed to be a compliment?
I'm more interested in candidates who are seriously in favor of withdrawal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Proud2BAmurkin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 03:10 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. More of a significant difference between them and RePUKES nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jan-25-07 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. True!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 06:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC