Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

..a New Age of Pragmatism in Washington.???

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-11-07 02:20 PM
Original message
..a New Age of Pragmatism in Washington.???



More like saving Butts!



http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/17554602/site/newsweek/page/2/

........That was the "final straw" for Gates, says the senior Bush aide, who did not want to be named characterizing Gates's personal views. (Gates himself declined NEWSWEEK's interview request.) The next day, at a National Security Council meeting at the White House, Gates quietly pulled the president aside and told him he was firing Harvey, the aide says. Gates summoned Harvey, who was visiting the Army's infantry command at Fort Benning, Ga., back to the Pentagon. At a short meeting in the Defense secretary's third-floor office, Gates told Harvey that the Army secretary had not grasped what the Defense secretary had meant about accountability. At a news conference an hour later, Gates said, "Some have shown too much defensiveness and have not shown enough focus on digging into and addressing the problems."


A Defense secretary who admits that his top officials have been too defensive? It was such a refreshing idea that some in the punditocracy were ready to declare a New Age of Pragmatism in Washington. Gates's candor about high-level blundering did seem illustrative of something different stirring in the inner councils of the Bush presidency. During the past several weeks, the administration has reversed course on two major foreign-policy fronts. After years of refusing to cut a deal with North Korea, the administration offered Pyongyang fuel and food in exchange for promises to slow down its nuclear program. And after insisting that the United States would not sit down with Iran until the mullahs gave up their push to build a nuclear bomb, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice announced that American representatives would be attending a conference between Iraq and Iran to talk about security issues.

When Rice went public with these diplomatic initiatives, Vice President Dick Cheney was not even in the country. Cheney was in Pakistan and Afghanistan at the time, dodging terrorists who set off a bomb outside Baghram Air Force Base while the vice president was "inside the wire." Suffering from blood clots, and with his valued deputy I. Lewis (Scooter) Libby convicted of perjury, Cheney seems to be drifting into the shadows, no longer the man behind the throne.

Rumsfeld gone, Cheney marginalized. Has President Bush himself gone soft, become a touchy-feely multilateralist? The answer is no—at least not yet, and probably never. White House officials (speaking anonymously about sensitive national-security-policy questions) insisted to NEWSWEEK that Iran's mullahs have been shaken and made more pliable by the administration's show of force in the region—capturing Iranian operatives in Iraq, sending two aircraft carriers steaming toward the Persian Gulf. (Gates was all for this saber-rattling, say his aides, who wouldn't be named for the same reason.) Bush is not about to suddenly reverse himself and embrace the recommendations of the Baker-Hamilton commission (of which Gates was a member) that call for a troop drawdown in Iraq and an all-encompassing international peace conference on the Middle East. What has changed so far in Bush's administration is more a matter of style than substance—though new ways of doing business can sometimes produce tangible differences in outcomes............
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC