Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Why Did Hagel Choke

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:00 AM
Original message
So Why Did Hagel Choke
On his announcement? It seems to me he was set to announce he was running. Goes to his home state, has reporters there, all to anounce...nothing. Er, um, that he was thinking about it. Shows like Tweety's were set to focus on him throwing his hat in the ring.

This doesn't feel right, the whole business was so anti-climatic that it just seems like something happened over the weekend to make him change his mind. I wonder what it is?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skipos Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:02 AM
Response to Original message
1. He is a loyal rightwing nutjob
who happens to be anti-war. Other than that, he will bow to his GOP masters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
2. like 2000, the masters of the GOP have already pcked their boy
and it aint someone with symptoms of independence like Hagel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:07 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. who do you think has been designated. And I agree with your assesement. Hagel got a horsehead
over the weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. "got a horsehead".... This website needs a glossary just for all the cool shorthands we use
Got a horsehead over the weekend. I'm gonna remember that one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. I Was Thinking Either Horsehead
or indies may have gotten to him and said he has a better chance with them. One of my friends who is big into conspiracies thinks Rudy, McCain & Oven Mitt are all non starters and that the party is wrangling things so that Jeb has to come in and save them. I can't believe anyone would want another * anywhere near the WH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #6
26. I am going to keep reminding people
Edited on Mon Mar-12-07 01:28 PM by windbreeze
that I have been saying it's gonna be Jeb for about a year now...Jr. has already stated it's only right that he gets his turn...and poppy said something very similar....they are going to let him stay in the background until it's time to really declare....then everyone else is going to disappear...JEB is the one...it's already planned...and since they have stolen 2 pres elections already...what makes us think they won't go for a third???

edited to add....imho
windbreeze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #26
35. I'll Be Damned
On the Situation Room room, just now, Carville just said Jeb would be the one, after the dust had settled. God that gives me the heebie jeebies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:09 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. aha....
what can I say....?? it may not turn out that way...but I have just had this feeling....I hope to hell I am wrong...because it means they intend to steal it again...the dems better take care of securing the vote, before 2008
windbreeze
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #26
42. Would the other financial elite let them do something as stupid as another Bush?
that would be like running Hitler's brother in Germany right after World War II. You'd have name recognition, but it wouldn't necessarily translate into votes.

Also, he sank himself with the religious right when he talked about his spirit guide Chang. They call that witchcraft. Not good.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 12:25 AM
Response to Reply #42
43. I would say....
that unless the Dems take action to secure the vote...then we are at risk...you notice we aren't hearing much about Jeb...everything is pretty quiet...well, he will be out of office for about two years, when it comes time...he's not exactly stupid looking like Jr....and people have a tendency to forget crap over time...look at the criminals in office now..and all the stuff they've gotten away with...you'd think by now, we'd be in a full blown revolution with the people physically removing them from office...but no...we just get dragged along day after day...sos...
we need to secure the vote...so it can't be stolen again..
wb..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 01:46 AM
Response to Reply #43
44. It's one thing to forget Papa Bush and vote for Baby, it's something else to forget worst president
in American history.

But you're right on the voting stuff in any case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. I have noticed lately, that people these days
have an increasingly shorter memory, and even less of an attention span...but we can certainly hope..control of the media wouldn't hurt either...
wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #3
13. I'm with Bucky on that
"got a horsehead". Nice colorful description of an intimidating message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 08:50 PM
Response to Reply #3
41. Fred Thompson from Law & Order
They have a serious problem right now: the qualified are unacceptable to their base, and those who are acceptable to their base make Charles Manson look like Noam Chomsky. The mental patients who bay at the moon are disturbed by the likes of Huckabee, Newt, and Brownback.

Therefore, they need to rig the game, and an actor was their best product before.

Also, a guy like Hagel might be dangerously independent, as would anyone who rose on merit not butt-licking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Ka-Ching
And they made him an offer he can't refuse.

The GOP Reich is run like an organized crime syndicate . .

because it is an organized crime syndicate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
47. yep--the crookedest one is Rudy. That's their boy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:09 AM
Response to Original message
4. Interesting, another GOP set up perhaps for 2008?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. He doesn't have a "base".
The Republicans won't vote for him because of his "anti-war" stance. The Democrats won't vote for him because of his stance on everything else. And, the "moderates" will vote for whoever has the nicest hair.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. "the "moderates" will vote for whoever has the nicest hair" - sadly, an all-too-true
assessment of how the American sheeple decide to vote. Nicest hair, who would be best to have a beer with, prettiest and most submissive wife, etc, etc, ad nauseum.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
8. Whatever the reason....Chuckie is now outta the loop...even if he runs, odds look poor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #8
30. He has been Perot'd
Made himself irrelevant.
However, I have no doubts he was horseheaded.
And I disagree that the Republicans won't back an anti-war candidate.
The problem is that they will en masse. He would get the moderates, the anti-war, and the Evangelicals.
Hegel would leave McCain/Guiliani/Romney in his dust if he announced his candidacy.
The problem is...it would isolate the President even more and marginalize him 100%.
He was threatened. Of this I have no doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:48 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. If republicans wouldn't
support an anti-war candidate, he wouldn't pose a problem for the Bush/Cheney administration. And because he creates a problem for the administration, it is safe to conclude that they know that he speaks for a significant segment of their party.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Exactly.
He would take the majority of the party with him--except for that loyal 30% that still supports Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. Yep.
He would potentially attract a significant number of independent voters, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. Yup, the midnight HorseHead....changed his mind...yeah right...
Those Pub Masters, they play ROUGH
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WI_DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
9. as a anti-war republican he will have a tough shot getting his parties nomination what he is
probably doing is evaluating the situatiion for a possible run as an Independent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Vinnie From Indy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
10. Hagel was probably shown the dossier that Rove & Co.
compiled from their illegal spying activity about him or his loved ones.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bdamomma Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. maybe Hagel was threatened
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Interesting.
He was moving in a very clear direction. He had been one of the senators, along with Biden and Lugar, who pushed an alternative that would have narrowed Bush's authority before the Iraqi invasion. He has taken positions that are, especially for a republican, anti-administration. And he made the comment on impeachment that you noted.

His strange display today would seem to indicate that something significant has taken place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:37 PM
Response to Reply #12
18. Yes, Very Interesting
Nice connect, about the impeachment statement from you and Alyce. Also, you're spot on about the direction he has been moving in, so he couldn't have been accused of politicizing the war as his position on it has been clear for a long time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TreasonousBastard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:09 PM
Response to Original message
14. Just guessing...
Since nobody even talks of running without having gathered some serious support first...

A- at least one party bigshot pulled support over the weekend.

B- at least one major fundraiser pulled support over the weekend.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
15. Another dimension to this
--he has said that he was concerned that anything he says in terms of Iraq/Iran during his Senate work will be construed as merely a campaign gimmick rather than principle/belief, a problem the clearly anti-war Dems who are running DON'T have. He said a bunch of Iraq resolutions are coming up for debate--is it possible he didn't want to politicize his positions? Or is he calculating enough to know that the media will still pay attention to what he says, and thus gets coverage anyway while looking "above the fray"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #15
16. Don't Think He'd Have A Problem With His Position On The War Being
misconstrued, his position has been pretty clear and he can't be accused of flipping and flopping.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:40 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. No, but I genuinely think it bothers him
to be seen as "poking" Bush in the eye all the time, and he knows it doesn't endear him to the base. He may need to lay low for a while during the Senate debates, or he's going to look like everything he says is for political calculation and campaign fodder. Now may not be the time to announce, but he's been running for pres for years, under the radar, and I think he still is. He also may have gotten a warning of some type from the powers-that-be--I wouldn't put it past this admin, especially now that his impeachment comments are hitting the newsstands. He's a loose cannon, and the GOP knows it. Chuck better watch his back and check under his hood, I'm afraid!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. The things you are
saying about timing, etc are on target. But they are all things that he has been fully aware of. And he has had a schedule of planned events that appear to have changed, significantly, over the weekend.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. I saw the entire press conference on local news,
and he talked about supporters, raising money, and other campaign concerns. He is running, he's just not saying so--I suspect it's either to avoid looking like a bastard by using Iraq as a campaign tool, as many in this state have already accused him of doing, or to keep his name out there without having to commit time and resources right now. I don't know if it will get beyond the initial stages, however. He still has his Firefighters Union appearance this week, and he took a presidential-candidate slot rather than a Senator slot, unless that's changed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. I saw it, too.
One rarely has a press conference and more scheduled, and then makes a "non-announcement." It certainly would not seem a campaign strategy, unless there is an advantage to looking confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:27 PM
Response to Reply #24
25. He said he wrote his speech two weeks ago--
I know that he had promised to make up his mind earlier, so maybe everyone will just have to take him at face value that he's decided to focus on Senate stuff right now and will keep his options open. I heard him say today he wasn't going to be rushed because of the media's time table or anyone else's campaigns, and that we are overdosing on the '08 campaign already, and I'd have to agree-it's too damn early. People are already starting to talk like Rudy and McCain are toast and that Newt or Fred are gonna steal the show in Sept., and we aren't anywhere near primaries yet. I don't think today's conference was any kind of strategy, just a news conference. And it answered questions, or at least put the answers off, for now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Good One
"unless there is an advantage to looking confused"

Wonder if there will be any hints on HB tonight, now that the focus of his show has evaporated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Right.
No matter if one likes or dislikes him, this Senator is not a stupid man. It seems to be a stretch to say that he would plan this flop, including writing his speech two weeks in advance, unless he was determined to appeal to the indecisive-minded folks who can't decide if they might support him maybe in the future, possibly. Of course, they'll have to think about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. In Addition
He had reporters fly to Omaha, not their usual stomping ground. You don't mess with the press that way, crying wolf will lose you your next press conference.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Both the democrat
and the republican that MSNBC had on to comment on the "big event" found it a curious event. The democrat said it raised the question, "Where's the beef?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CK_John Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
17. Bill Gates called and said, "Chuck, I told you VP not Pres", IMO n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
36. The sooner people realize that Hagel is a wingnut, the better.
Hagel's record: here and here.

Then there is Hagel's ES&S connection: Hagel's ethics filings pose disclosure issue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Horse with no Name Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. We know his record
However...don't doubt that his anti-war stance didn't earn him a weekend visit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Me. Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-12-07 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. IT's A Cuckoo's Nest Political Season
Weird all over the place already. The dems are lucky this time out, with viable candidates and aren't going to have to make Hobson's choice this time around.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NuttyFluffers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 03:28 AM
Response to Original message
45. republicans don't have primaries. they have pony shows.
trust me, i've been registered with this bastardized GOP party for years now. one of my only reasons for joining was so that i could actually have a say in primary politics and put better candidates up (that and the delightful amount of hysterical propaganda -- no really, the propaganda is almost always in full shrieking hysteria mode. it's hilarious!). but i've come to a sad conclusion: only democrats bother to hurt themselves with primaries, republicans decide behind closed doors ahead of time and put out a candidate with fully expected blind obedience behind them.

so let's have no delusions that there's actually a choice or free will involved in the republican party. hagel got slapped down because he broke the 11th commandment and his aspirations were dried up as punishment. it's obvious. at most he'd be rewarded for stealing some of the democrats thunder, but only later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yurbud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #45
48. their last real primary was Reagan vs. Papa Bush
McCain made a good early showing in 2000, but he got knocked out the way Howard Dean did--character assassination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC