Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin is a thief! Check this out! I can't wait until this gas bag w lipstick is old news.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:17 PM
Original message
Palin is a thief! Check this out! I can't wait until this gas bag w lipstick is old news.
Edited on Mon Sep-08-08 11:46 PM by lonestarnot
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/08/AR2008090803088.html?hpid=topnews


Palin Billed State for Nights Spent at Home
Taxpayers Also Funded Family's Travel

By James V. Grimaldi and Karl Vick
Washington Post Staff Writers
Tuesday, September 9, 2008; Page A01

ANCHORAGE, Sept. 8 -- Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin has billed taxpayers for 312 nights spent in her own home during her first 19 months in office, charging a "per diem" allowance intended to cover meals and incidental expenses while traveling on state business.

The governor also has charged the state for travel expenses to take her children on official out-of-town missions. And her husband, Todd, has billed the state for expenses and a daily allowance for trips he makes on official business for his wife.

Palin, who earns $125,000 a year, claimed and received $16,951 as her allowance, which officials say was permitted because her official "duty station" is Juneau, according to an analysis of her travel documents by The Washington Post
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wow, they really didn't vet this person at all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Wow! She's a fucking theif! I believe that is called fucking fraud!
They got me cursing again! "Dat ting got my blood a boil'n!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
firedupdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:29 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. She is a real piece of work
Let's see the "spin" on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL Yeah can't wait for that either. Spinning tops w/ drills! Can they drill to China so
we can start funneling all of our money in that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pacalo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. Or, they don't give a hoot because they don't need the votes - they're stealing the election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quiet.american Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
5. Yet McCain stands up there and swears he's going to TAKE OUT THE PORK. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
7. Just curious...Is this the REALLY BIG news we've been waiting for?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ourbluenation Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:47 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. couldn't be - it's supposed to be about mccain. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #7
18. Nope! MCSAME. He will steal the spotlight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KansasVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:43 PM
Response to Original message
8. Is this the big story you are hyping???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:14 AM
Response to Reply #8
19. Nope. MCSAME. He will be the star for that one. LOL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
9. the real meat is at the end of the article...
In the past, per diem claims by Alaska state officials have carried political risks. In 1988, the head of the state Commerce Department was pilloried for collecting a per diem charge of $50 while staying in his Anchorage home, according to local news accounts. The commissioner, the late Tony Smith, resigned amid a series of controversies. "It was quite the little scandal," said Tony Knowles, the Democratic governor from 1994 to 2000. "I gave a direction to all my commissioners if they were ever in their house, whether it was Juneau or elsewhere, they were not to get a per diem because, clearly, it is and it looks like a scam -- you pay yourself to live at home," he said.

Knowles, whose children were school-age at the start of his first term, said that his wife sometimes accompanied him to conferences overseas but that he could "count on one hand" the number of times his children accompanied him. "And the policy was not to reimburse for family travel on commercial airlines, because there is no direct public benefit to schlepping kids around the state," he said. The rules were articulated by Mike Nizich, then director of administrative services in the governor's office, said Knowles and an aide to another former governor, Walter Hickel.

Nizich is now Palin's chief of staff. He did not return a phone call seeking comment. The rules governing family travel on state-owned aircraft appear less clear. Knowles said he operated under the understanding that immediate family could accompany the governor without charge. But during the Murkowski years, that practice was questioned, and the state attorney general's office produced an opinion saying laws then in effect required reimbursement for spousal travel.


i do believe that the lady is toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orestes Donating Member (543 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:49 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Doubtful
Edited on Mon Sep-08-08 11:50 PM by orestes
Doesn't have nearly enough sex to interest the vaunted "low information voters."

While this will cause some gnashing of teeth here, that doesn't really matter much because we already weren't gonna vote for McCain anyway.

Won't matter on the right because this has nothing to do with why the religious nutters are all in a twitter over her.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dysfunctional press Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:56 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. i don't think they'll get a chance to vote for her...
this is the kind of stuff that could bounce her from the ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nite Owl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:00 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. They can't win with just their
base. They need some of the Independent voters and this will lose them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:16 AM
Response to Reply #9
20. With lipstick on top! mmmmmm
:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:46 PM
Response to Original message
10. She kind of fits in with BushCo.
Do you think it will be a problem with them? They may not look at it as crime but being money smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:17 AM
Response to Reply #10
21. People don't like it when you fuck with their money.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cleita Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:20 AM
Response to Reply #21
23. I know I don't like it but since she's effing with government money
and BushCo does the same, it seems they are peas in a pod.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:31 AM
Response to Reply #23
25. And that money came from taxpayers, and yes bushitlers of a feather, hence McSames
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eric J in MN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-08-08 11:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. The cover-up.
===============================================
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/08/AR2008090803088_2.html?hpid=topnews


She wrote some form of "Lodging -- own residence" or "Lodging -- Wasilla residence" more than 30 times at the same time she took a per diem, according to the reports. In two dozen undated amendments to the reports, the governor deleted the reference to staying in her home but still charged the per diem.
===============================================
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
johnnydrama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:05 AM
Response to Original message
16. I kind of doubt
That the law in Alaska is meant for the Governor to live 600 miles away, and then everytime she decides to go in to work, the state is supposed to pay for her and her family.

Try that at your job.

They may pay for your 25 mile commute. Ask them if you can live 600 miles away, and they can pay for you to fly in every week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
17. oh dear...
It's only Monday. I've read a bunch of articles today about some whacked out shit this lady has done. Making rape victims pay for their own rape kits, involuntary use of shock treatment on children. Why are all these republicans sadistic nutjobs?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:18 AM
Response to Reply #17
22. NAZIs thought they owned the world too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:21 AM
Response to Original message
24. And she'll say... It no big deal,
it goes with the job. And the media, if they mention it at all, will agree.. Oh that little thing it's no big deal:banghead:

Yes she is an arrogant, pompous thief! With lipstick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lonestarnot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 12:33 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. Oh and shit now they're talking about her cultship.
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 12:35 AM by lonestarnot
Tongue talkers. Maybe they better pass the plate around her, she might snatch herself a few bucks. :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underseasurveyor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:16 AM
Response to Reply #26
29. HA HA HA
Pass the plate AROUND her:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FatDave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:05 AM
Response to Original message
27. I said it in the other thread, but I'll say it in this one too.
This is the one that sinks her (and probably McCain with her). It's highly prosecutable, and it's easy enough for the sedated masses to understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
B Calm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. I agree it's highly prosecutable, but in a state that is not on the take!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
renate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 01:12 AM
Response to Original message
28. Alaska is a big state... but so is Texas
Isn't the governor pretty much expected to live in Austin? Does any other state have an arrangement like this? I'd like to know which "officials say was permitted."

And WTH? Charging the state to take her children on business? Oh hells to the no. This would set working women back 50 years if she begs off with "but I'm a working mother" and claims that taking them along was necessary to doing her job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
radfringe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 03:51 AM
Response to Original message
30. reminds me of something that happened in Massachusetts
Edited on Tue Sep-09-08 03:52 AM by radfringe
MA DUers check in - help me out here

can't remember who the woman was, but on the taxpayers dime she was driven from Western Mass to/from Boston everyday. Was that Jane Swift? or someone else?

speaking of Swift:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Swift

By the end of her term, Swift was extremely unpopular with voters in the state (at one point having the dubious honor of a single-digit approval rating). This unpopularity was due in part to a perceived lack of effectiveness and in part to apparent abuses of her gubernatorial privileges, including: her use of a Massachusetts State Police helicopter to commute cross-state, from Boston to her home in North Adams; and, the use of State House aides to babysit her children.


btw - Swift is backing Palin-McCain:
Swift rallies in defense of PalinBy James W. Pindell
http://www.politickerma.com/jamespindell/1029/swift-rallies-defense-palin
ST. PAUL, Minn. – Former Gov. Jane Swift (R-North Adams) was the lead defender of what she called "sexist" media attacks on Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin in the last week.

"It is clear that Sarah Palin loves her children and we should leave it at that," said Swift.

Swift led a press conference today with other Republican women aimed at crushing what they said were sexist narratives seen in the media ever since Palin was selected to be the first Republican woman on a national ticket when U.S. John McCain selected her as his running mate last week.


has anyone ever found out who was taking care of the kids while Palin was working? I remember reading something about the "first dude" doing it while Palin was mayor, but went back to work. And there was some mention that the kids were farmed out to relatives/friends.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lynnertic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 05:13 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. "Who was taking care of the kids while Palin was working (1 of every 3 days/year)"
By the evidence of one pregnant teen and another being shipped to Iraq instead of jail, I would guess that they were taking care of themselves while she was working (1 of every three days/year).

I wonder how her vacation time compares with W's.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-09-08 05:17 AM
Response to Original message
32. Sarah is "Special" and She has Special Needs...
She's a Beauty Queen!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC