Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I hope this plea for help doesn't get swallowed up, but how would I find the following information?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:47 AM
Original message
I hope this plea for help doesn't get swallowed up, but how would I find the following information?
The president of a regional builder's association is claiming that the building industry in America always does better when Republicans are in charge. For all I know, he is correct but I'd like to find concrete numbers that either support or refute his claim. What would I google? I'm not even sure how to begin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MadHound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would check with the Homebuilder's Association or other such like national association
They should have a website up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iamjoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
2. Because They're Doing So Well Now
right?

:eyes:

Sorry I don't have a real answer, just a smart mouthed response, but at least I keep it going. Maybe some one has some facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:51 AM
Response to Original message
3. Manny Dembs - National Association of Home Builders, Director

See if he is still around. He used to be quite a pistol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
4. Ask him
That's easy. Ask him for documentation to support his claim. You shouldn't have to "rebut" anything he says - he should be prepared to back up his claims with the proper references and authorities.

So, just ask him for those references.

It's nuts, the idea of YOU doing his job. When someone makes a claim like that, they are obligated to reference it properly. If he refuses, then you use that against him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. Since he is a repug, he doesnt have to back up anything.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Yeah, you got that right.
But, the basic flaw in the OP is that the individual believes HE has to DISPROVE what the guy claimed. Instead of demanding that the guy prove the veracity of his statement.

That's been the problem with current Democrats - they take the defensive position, meekly going off to research or some such nonsense, instead of standing up and making the guy who makes the statement prove that it's true. Putting HIM on the defensive.

This kind of "bended knee" behavior drives me nuts. Democrats are just going to keep getting slapped around until they wise up and stand up to these statistic-spewing cranks.

Remember when the matter of George W. Bush's earlier drug use came up? Remember how he handled it?

As soon as someone asked him a question about it, he said, "I'm not gonna talk about that," and it was never brought up again.

I just wish Democrats would fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:06 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. You've nailed it!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Let me tell you why Obama is going to lose -
it happened last night, and it left me in tears.

Keith Olbermann asked him, the final question of the interview on last night's "Countdown," if he - or the Democrats - would have done what the Republicans did at their convention, showing that horrid, graphic video about 9/11.

I twitched in my chair, wanting Obama just to say "No. Doing that was a crass exploitation of an American tragedy that took place during a Republican administration."

I twitched, and I held on, and Obama hesitated, and then went into a rap about something or other, and ended, quite lamely, with "We would never have shown it."

That was it. I started to cry, because I realized the guy has no balls. No appetite for even the smallest fight - and the small fights are where the battles are won. I have given him everything I could in the way of financial support, and I think he's an extraordinary human being, but, in his rigid political correctness, with his desire to be conciliatory instead of confrontational, he was soft, he is soft, and that is why Obama/Biden are going to lose in November.

And my heart is broken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OwnedByFerrets Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I dont agree with you that he has no balls....
I will agree that the "media" has democrats so gunshy that they are "afraid" to say ANYTHING that could be taken out of context. This lipstick and a pig is a perfect example. Obama said nothing wrong, but the media took it, twisted it and ran with it.
When KO asked Obama about their lying, Obama refused to come out and call them liars. I was on the edge of my seat yelling for him to call them bald faced liars. He refused to do it. Why? Because the next day, all the networks and every outlet would be demanding an apology from BO for daring to call a POW a liar.....even though its true. Truth in this environment seems not to matter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tangerine LaBamba Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. In this campaign,
he has shown no balls. His refusal to engage directly will lead to his downfall.

Since the networks will be all over him anyway, why not speak the truth?

He's breaking my heart, and if he's losing die-hard supporters like me, imagine how he's coming across to those who are undecided.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Iris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. wait...how does a mortgage crisis help builders?
anyway, I just wanted to give your post a little kick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. We are talking about Republicans here. Facts are of little to no consequence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. Tell him to prove it or it is just a made up rumor. And, how does mortgage crisis help builders?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sinkingfeeling Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. Here's one table on home construction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
14. "new housing starts" is the stat you want
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pacifist Patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. Found them! Check this out.
This is what I sent the moron. He seems to have a bee up his butt about Congress being in a stranglehold by the Democrats for the last 19 months so I had to include that information.

------------

Annual Housing Starts (Single Family & Multi-Family Totals) per National Association of Home Builders. I chose the last two years of each administration figuring this gives some time for the administration's economic policies to begin to show some affect. The results cannot be accounted for by holdover from the previous administration.

Last two years of Jimmy Carter's administration
96th Congress with a Democratic majority in both houses
3,765,400

Last two years of Ronald Reagan's administration
100th Congress with a Democratic majority in both houses
3,108,600

Last two years of George Bush's administration
102nd Congress with a Democratic majority in both houses
2,213,600

Last two years of Bill Clinton's administration: 3,209,600
106th Congress with a Republican majority in both houses
3,209,600

Last two years: (actual last two years of GWB's administration will be much lower. The stronger year was 2006 with 1.8 in annual housing starts and a huge drop to 1.35 in 2007)
Split between a Congress with a Republican majority in both houses and a Congress tied in the Senate and a 31 seat lead in the House.
3,156,100

So how is that home building going for you when a Republican is sitting in the Oval Office?

While of course legislation has impact, notice the precipitous decline when the nation turns to supply side economics under Reagan/Bush despite a Democratic legislature that supported strong new home starts with the Democratic president that preceeded Reagan/Bush. The most consistent pattern does appear to be White House occupancy as opposed to control of congress. I'm not naive. I do understand that there are myriad factors that impact our economy and affect new home starts. But if someone is going to assert builders are better off with a Republican president I have to call bullshit.

Astounding how someone, on the very day the taxpayers begin to bail out THE two mortgage companies with liabilities that can literally affect the entire global economy, can claim with a straight face that builders do better under Republicans than Democrats. One wonders if he's completely blind to the downsizing member companies have repeatedly resorted to over the last several years. What rock does this man live under?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AnarchoFreeThinker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. excellent
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. found them
Edited on Wed Sep-10-08 04:15 PM by Dissent Is Patriotic
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dissent Is Patriotic Donating Member (793 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. Does anyone know where I can find this data for all new construction
over time? (looked on this site and they have it by year, but no chart that summarizes each year and where the dollars are set to a certain year)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:12 PM
Response to Original message
16. I don't know but you might ask him if filling those buildings is a concern
I remember at the start of the 80's, builders in the Dallas area went crazy. Seven years later, there was nothing but empty new buildings as far as the eye could see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
17. WEll, the stock market and the economy always do worse under Repugs,
so it doesn't make sense that building industry would do well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Oct 17th 2024, 10:25 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC