Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Must read at Talkingpointsmemo - link below. The timeline.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
NRaleighLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 08:55 AM
Original message
Must read at Talkingpointsmemo - link below. The timeline.
http://www.tpmmuckraker.com/archives/002734.php

This is a peek into the cesspool under Gonzalez. There is that odd duck Harriet Myers emerging again as an important name. Read it and weep. Impeach now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
1. remember, this is well within the legal powers of the President
US Attorneys serve at the pleasure of the President. They can be fired for any reason at all. The interesting things here are the involvement of Domenici and Wilson in New Mexico, and the potential lying about the reasons for them being fired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kstewart33 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 09:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. You're right, but the extent of lying is stunning.
Even for this crew. Domenici should resign as should Gonzales. Remember the old prosecutorial saying - it's not the crime that gets them in trouble, it's the coverup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. except in this case
there wasn't even a crime. they should have simply come out and said 'we are firing them because they don't meet our priorities," and this would all have been over.

just to show what idiots they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 10:04 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. How many other presidents have considered firing all 93
when they started their SECOND term? The 93 that they themselves hired when they first took office? I think even the 8 that they settled on is unprecedented.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. it may be unprecedented
but it is perfectly legal. US Attorneys work, as I said "at the pleasure of the President" he can fire them if he doesn't like their shoes.

the legal problem is in lying to Congress about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. Lying to Congress isn't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drbtg1 Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:54 AM
Response to Reply #1
7. even if it impedes a legal investigation?
That, I would think, would be Congress's justification for hearing (and maybe more).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northzax Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. well, only if the intent is to impede a legal investigation
otherwise you could never fire any Attorney, because there is always something being investigated.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
drbtg1 Donating Member (932 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Well, considering the selection of attorneys that were fired...
...it may be easy to make that case (other than the buddy of Rove, of course).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC