Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NYT - tepid rebuke of Gore and "Truth"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 10:06 AM
Original message
NYT - tepid rebuke of Gore and "Truth"
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/13/science/13gore.html?pagewanted=1&ei=5087%0A&em&en=7b7338256ee3de7a&ex=1173931200

Criticisms of Mr. Gore have come not only from conservative groups and prominent skeptics of catastrophic warming, but also from rank-and-file scientists like Dr. Easterbook, who told his peers that he had no political ax to grind. A few see natural variation as more central to global warming than heat-trapping gases. Many appear to occupy a middle ground in the climate debate, seeing human activity as a serious threat but challenging what they call the extremism of both skeptics and zealots.

Kevin Vranes, a climatologist at the Center for Science and Technology Policy Research at the University of Colorado, said he sensed a growing backlash against exaggeration. While praising Mr. Gore for “getting the message out,” Dr. Vranes questioned whether his presentations were “overselling our certainty about knowing the future.”

Typically, the concern is not over the existence of climate change, or the idea that the human production of heat-trapping gases is partly or largely to blame for the globe’s recent warming. The question is whether Mr. Gore has gone beyond the scientific evidence.

“He’s a very polarizing figure in the science community,” said Roger A. Pielke Jr., an environmental scientist who is a colleague of Dr. Vranes at the University of Colorado center. “Very quickly, these discussions turn from the issue to the person, and become a referendum on Mr. Gore.”


------

a lot of nit picky stuff, some in regard to Hurricanes,
yes, Gore knows that the number of hurricanes is
not expected to increase, just the intensity. Says so
in his book.
You can question whether tropical diseases are being
spread by global warming, or more by world transportation
systems, but its chicken and egg stuff.

They trot out Richard Lindzen, noted Global Warming skeptic.
A few naysayers on the "Medieval Warming" - now understood to
have been a regional, not global phenomenon.
IPCC says the recent warming is "highly likely" to be the
warmest in at least 1300 years -
there have been some warm spells in the last 10,000 years
mediated by orbital factors.

bottom line:

Michael Oppenheimer, a professor of geosciences and international affairs at Princeton who advised Mr. Gore on the book and movie, said that reasonable scientists disagreed on the malaria issue and other points that the critics had raised. In general, he said, Mr. Gore had distinguished himself for integrity.

“On balance, he did quite well — a credible and entertaining job on a difficult subject,” Dr. Oppenheimer said. “For that, he deserves a lot of credit. If you rake him over the coals, you’re going to find people who disagree. But in terms of the big picture, he got it right.”

-----

I'm sure you'll hear some of this parroted on talk shows,
but not much "there" there.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pbca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
1. I don't even care if he is "overselling" it
It's been undersold for so many years now that it's probably already too late to save a large number of coastal cities.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 10:25 AM
Response to Original message
2. And, mildly trashing Gore beginning the buildup ....just in case he runs for '08.
Thanks for posting this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlGore-08.com Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's not just that, it's because he's going to testify to Congress on 3/21
On the climate crisis. The folks who oppose a sane response to the crisis (and/or Al Gore are an 08 candidate) are definitely going to be working the phones this week, trying to get the storyline changed to "Nobody who really understands the climate crisis listens to alarmists like Al Gore".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 10:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. That's the new meme in a nutshell. Shame the NYT has to feature it.
Bit late in the game to offer new memes, I wonder if it will work. Guess they had to, the "Don't listen to Gore, he is a hypocrite because he lives in a big house and flies on airplanes" didn't work out too well for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:03 AM
Response to Original message
5. Corpmedia is going to keep doing this to both Gore and Kerry till Democrats GROW UP
Edited on Tue Mar-13-07 11:03 AM by blm
and stop buying into the constant media manipulation of their most powerful advocates and their characters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-13-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
6. "no political ax to grind" ... except maybe
a few thou in checks in a numbered account in the Caymans ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC