Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Libby Trial Update -- we're finally at 36!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 10:57 AM
Original message
Libby Trial Update -- we're finally at 36!
If you've been following the Libby trial voir dire on www.firedoglake.com, you'll be delighted to know that they just seated the 36th juror. Peremptory strikes are up in an hour.

Julie
still president for life of the PFEB
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. great news!
It's showtime!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
2. I'll kick that. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
3. Yey
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
4. About time
When do opening arguements start?

I want to be sure I have plenty of popcorn.

Thanks
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. Probably tomorrow morning
>When do opening arguements start?<

Court is in session as of 9:30 a.m. Eastern Monday-Thursday, so I'm imagining they'll get underway shortly afterwards.

We're still waiting for them to come back from lunch over on www.firedoglake.com. We haven't heard about the peremptory strikes as of yet. Evidently, there was a discussion before lunch about jury instructions.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. Mr. Fitzgerald's opening statement
will compete with the Bush state of the onion address. Poor George.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. Will there be any broadcast (TV or radio) of Fitzgerald's opening statement?
I'd really like to listen to intonations and emphasis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. No, but there are
some good journalists and some very talented bloggers who will "translate" for us. I'll be interested to hear about both side's opening statements.

I'm assuming Teddy Wells will speak for the defense, when it is their turn. He is very good at what he does. I understand why a guilty person would want him defending them.

But the far more impressive part will be Mr. Fitzgerald. As DUers will recall from the press conference announcing the indictments, Patrick isn't "slick," like a couple of the guys on Team Libby. It's his "force of personality." And his uncanny ability to memorize a large number of facts, and to present them in a concise, organized, and rational manner.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 02:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. TahitiNut, you can read live coverage via blog
at http://www.firedoglake.com.

They are already doing a masterful job on covering the voir dire; it's a psychologist, a former federal prosecutor and the author of the new book "Anatomy of Deceit" (describing the run-up to the Libby case,) this week.

I think you'll enjoy it. In the meantime, pass the popcorn. It should be a fun six weeks or so.

:popcorn:
Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. I have my popcorn ready. I still would like to hear intination and emphasis.
In college, I never relied on anyone else for notes. I'm just not good at getting impressions second-hand - even with 'professional' journalists. I've encountered far too much off-base second-hand 'knowledge' to be comfortable with relying on doing the same. If I had the time and resources, I'd probably enjoy getting in line for a seat in the courtroom in DC myself.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
janx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #13
20. WOW.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #13
27. The jury will want to know right away--"why are they there?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SpiralHawk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 09:04 AM
Response to Reply #27
51. Why? Because Bush & Cronies betrayed the United States of America
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 09:05 AM by SpiralHawk
Treason in the White House, republicon toadies exposing the operatives who were defending America for their own, narrow, deviant republicon reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AndyA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:23 AM
Response to Original message
5. Pass the popcorn, this should be worth watching.
:popcorn:

I wonder how hard the White House is going to fight Fitzgerald? Everything will be top secret/classified/a matter of national security.

Right. Yeah, we believe that. This from the same people who told us Saddam had WMDs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. 36?
Okay, somebody explain please. Aren't there 12 jurors and about 6 alternates? And also, is it a coincidence that most of the potential jurors called, the majoirty of them were white? At least that's what I was hearing on cable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. It's a weird Federal procedure for selecting a jury
From the original pool, each side gets an unlimited number of challenges for cause, where they can object to jurors because of excessive bias. If no one challenges a particular potential juror, or if the challenges for cause are denied by the judge, then that juror becomes the next in line for the final 36.

Then, once the final 36 are selected, each side gets "peremptory challenges" where they can challenge a potential juror for any reason and the judge may not refuse the challenge (although race is not an acceptable factor). The government gets 8 peremptories, and the defense gets 10. So they start at potential juror #1, and if neither side uses a peremptory, that person is officially juror #1, and so on.

So if they make it all the way to #36, that person is automatically alternate juror #6, because both sides will have exhausted their challenges by then. However, if jurors #1-12 and alternates #1-6 are chosen before then, anyone left is dismissed.

As for the pool being mostly white, I heard that too, but I have no explanation -- while statistically unlikely, it is not impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Isn't it very likely indeed statistically?
What fraction of the pool of electors they're calling from are white?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Geoff R. Casavant Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:48 PM
Response to Reply #9
29. From what I heard on the radio this morning:
In DC, where the trial is being held, 60% of the population is African-American, but 80% of the jury pool was white, so statistically there are at least twice as many non-AfAm's in the pool as one would expect from a random sample.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:50 PM
Response to Reply #29
44. The odds of that happening given a random selection are about 1 in 20.

W ~ Bin(36,0.4)

Or approximately

W ~ N(36 x 0.4, 36 x 0.4 x 0.6)
~ N(14.4,8.6)

36 x 0.8 = 28.8

P(W > 28.8) = P( (W-14.4)/8.6 > (28.8-14.4)/8.6)
= P( Z > 1.67)

Where Z ~ N(0,1)

This is about 0.048, so the odds of that degree or more or whiteness arrising randomly are about 1 in in 20.

N.B. That's *not* the same claim as "the chance that this selection was random was 1/20", and doesn't a priori give you any information about what that probability is.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #7
15. Geoff, thank you so much for the explanation n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #7
22. Thank you for the explanation.
:hi: Pass the popcorn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Things are good.
I think it is 12 and 4. It doesn't matter. Our friend only needs to strike 3 potential jurors, at the very most. Libby is going to be convicted on all counts if he goes to trial.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 12:00 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. This is one trial I wish was televised.
I can't believe the trial is finally starting.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:11 PM
Response to Reply #8
37. Why do you think
Cheney is supposedly willing to testify?

This is the guy that won't even admit who came to his energy meetings. Isn't he taking a big risk going up against Fitzgerald?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #37
40. Huge risk ....
for Cheney. Up until Judge Walton rejected the memory comic, er, expert, I do not think that Team Libby had planned to call Dick. But things changed. They needed something "big" to distract the jury. And when they realized Mr. Fitzgerald was not calling Cheney, they had to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
antigop Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
46. IF he goes to trial
IF.....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. Cat_girl, they choose 36, or in this case, 37
Both sides get peremptory strikes, which means they get to exclude jurors without having to state a reason for it. The defense gets 10 and 2 alternates, the prosecution gets 4 and 2 alternates. They'll end up with 12 jurors and 4 alternates.

The judge has an unlimited amount of strikes, but I'm not sure if there will be additional ones or what. The additional delay is because the prosecution asked for criminal background checks on all jurors.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 11:57 AM
Response to Original message
10. kick
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Thanks, blogslut
Have I mentioned that I LOVE your username?

:hi:
Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:13 PM
Response to Reply #16
23. I think that we're going to have to remind each other to breathe
during this trial. :hi: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. LOL, Myrna Minx!
I'm already about to jump out of my skin, and we haven't even gotten to the opening arguments yet!

:scared:

In the meantime, it just wouldn't be a trial thread without our best wishes going out to this guy, would it?



The Rune of St. Patrick

At Tara to-day in this fateful hour
I place all Heaven with its power,
And the sun with its brightness,
And the snow with its whiteness,
And the fire with all the strength it hath,
And the lightning with its rapid wrath,
And the winds with their swiftness along their path,
And the sea with its deepness,
And the rocks with their steepness,
And the earth with its starkness
All these I place,
By God’s almighty help and grace,
Between myself and the forces of darkness.

Julie
still president for life of the PFEB



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. *Sigh* There's our dreamboat.
:loveya: *swoon*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robbien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 03:22 PM
Response to Reply #10
24. Thanks for the kick.
I missed the thread the first time around.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
28. If anyone's interested in following along
The jury is being chosen at this very moment.

Live blogging: http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/22/libby-liveblog-preemptory-challenges/#comments

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
robertpaulsen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
30. Anyone know what happened to Juror No. 0677?
I've been looking through firedoglake (wow, there's a lot there!) but haven't found out yet.


Scooter Libby Trial - Watch Out For Juror No. 0677
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=364&topic_id=3146507
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #30
32. We are unsure at this point
Pachacutec of firedoglake will probably be doing a wrap-up later.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:05 PM
Response to Original message
31. We now have a seated jury
They are receiving instructions from the judge as we speak.

Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
33. LOL! Check this out at Firedoglake.com....
Trial starts tomorrow. Will do instructions tonight. Says he'll do it again, not to insult their intelligence, but to make sure they comply with the way the trial will be run.

Telling jurors not to talk to anyone about this.

"You can't start to decide anything about this case until everything has been presented to you."

{div class="excerpt"]Talks about the difficulty of changing your opinion once formed.

"You CANNOT have any discussions whatsoever about this case."

"You're not going to have that problem because you're not going out to lunch" Then assures them they will feed them. They get breakfast and lunch every day. Mmm. Free food.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Now he's telling a story about a guy who talked about the case to his "precocious high school daughter." She kept telling him (since she was studying the jury system) that he couldn't talk about the case. Dad said he paid the mortgage and he could do what he wanted. Daughter said, "who's the judge." So she called up Walton and ratted Dad out.

Says NO contact with the media about this case. You can't have any contact with the media. "I assume there will be a certain amount of media coverage about the case."

They will be providing screened newspapers to the jury. Don't listen to the radio. Don't watch the news. Says they can watch Judge Judy.


Not so smart dad. :rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 05:19 PM
Response to Original message
34. From firedoglake.com: Late thirties, white female, very giggly, is in.
I think I know why she's giggly....


:loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #34
35. I have been nowhere near Washington, DC!
Then again, I'm not in my late 30's, either...

:loveya:
Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
foreverdem Donating Member (759 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #34
47. Well, could you really blame her?
I'd be delirious.:loveya: :loveya: :loveya:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
36. schedule for tomorrow
Edited on Mon Jan-22-07 06:07 PM by Annces
Schedule for tomorrow:

9:30 - 10:30 Jury Instructions
10:30 to 11:30 Fitz' opening
12:00 to 1:00 Wells Part One
2:00 to 3:00 Wells Part Two


Jurors
9 Women
3 Men

10 Caucasion
2 African American

http://www.firedoglake.com/2007/01/22/the-libby-jury-is-seated/#comments


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DoYouEverWonder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:17 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Excellent
Just in time to screw up W's SOTU. I bet he's going to be very distracted and off his game tomorrow night. I can wait.

:popcorn:



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. Nothing like having a "jury of your peers".
:eyes: The demographically lop-sided juries are really troubing to me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:23 PM
Response to Reply #39
41. It's not going
to be a problem. There is a lot of evidence that hasn't been made public yet. I'm confident that Mr. Fitzgerald is going to get convictions on all counts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Annces Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #39
42. I think it is still okay because many of the jurors
have some math or logic ability which Fitzgerald wants.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #42
43. Right.
Court rooms are not governed by the same laws of logic that the "real world" (or the "reel world") are. We need only look back to the discussions regarding Judge Walton a year ago. Many DUers were opposed to his hearing the case, because they were applying the logic of the real world. But, as a few DUers pointed out, we benefit from having a conservative judge in this case -- so long as he tries to follow the law.

The jury is fine. We are on track.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 08:37 PM
Response to Original message
45. Let's Roll!
K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Patsy Stone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-22-07 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
48. I can't wait for tomorrow!
Is it 10:30 yet?

K&R for Fitz!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missy Vixen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 12:01 AM
Response to Reply #48
49. Tomorrow, tomorrow, I love you, tomorrow...
You're only a day away... :woohoo:



Julie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 07:26 AM
Response to Reply #49
50. Good Morning, Good Morning ....
Nothing to do to save his life call his wife in
Nothing to say but what a day how's your boy been
Nothing to do it's up to you
I've got nothing to say but it's O.K.
Good morning, good morning...
Going to work don't want to go feeling low down
Heading for home you start to roam then you're in town
Everybody knows there's nothing doing
Everything is closed it's like a ruin
Everyone you see is half asleep.
And you're on your own you're in the street
Good morning, good morning...
After a while you start to smile now you feel cool.
Then you decide to take a walk by the old school.
Nothing has changed it's still the same
I've got nothing to say but it's O.K.
Good morning, good morning...
People running round it's five o'clock.
Everywhere in town is getting dark.
Everyone you see is full of life.
It's time for tea and meet the wife.
Somebody needs to know the time, glad that I'm here.
Watching the skirts you start to flirt now you're in gear.
Go to a show you hope she goes.
I've got nothing to say but it's O.K.
Good morning, good morning...

(lyrics by John Lennon)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jan-23-07 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
52. Watching!
Edited on Tue Jan-23-07 10:54 AM by Gregorian
It's like a holiday. I'm out in the shop, moving things onto the trailer. Getting ready to move. But the Libby trial is on my notes for the day.

Something tells me democracy lives. Justice, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Dec 27th 2024, 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC