Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Andrea Mitchell: Drunk Again?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
CatWoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:51 AM
Original message
Andrea Mitchell: Drunk Again?
I really don't know when any sense of journalistic shame is going to kick in with Andrea Mitchell. There seems to be no limit to what she will say or do when the cameras are rolling, and the fact that the right is as angry as the left about her continued journalistic malfeasance in the CIA leak case means it has gotten pretty friggin' bad.

And it does not fall into the category of "well everyone is upset so she must be doing something right." Wrong. She's a big, fat festering boil on the posterior of NBC that somebody needs to lance.

Despite the fact that the Libby defense team spent copious amounts of time trying to drag Mitchell into court to testify about her October 2003 statement to Alan Murray of CNBC to the effect that "It was widely known among those of us who cover the intelligence community and who were actively engaged in trying to track down who among the foreign service community was the envoy to Niger," she still continues to report on the case. And even though her reporting continues to be factually challenged, false and downright misleading, she just Will Not Shut Up.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/jane-hamsher/andrea-mitchell-drunk-a_b_43385.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
1. Andrea is the mouth piece for the corporate puppet masters...
you need look no further than her husband for proof of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Norquist Nemesis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
2. Andrea has a 'special relationship' with higher-ups
Or should I say "Mrs. Greenspan" has connections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. You beat me to it by a few milliseconds! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HamdenRice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 10:56 AM
Response to Original message
3. You mean Mrs. Alan Greenspan?
She is too well connected to get canned and probably brings loads of access and inside info to NBC.

For this reason, like the poor, she will always be with us.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
5. We have always known she is incompetent as a journalist and
the corporate powers that be, she is the spokesperson for.

She would never of had/have the job if it was not for her husband.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:19 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. She was a journalist before she married him.
If you can call what she does , " journalisim ." :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. Really; didn't know that so I am wrong to blame it on Greenspan
for getting her the job. Well, she must have known someone else high up before him. Because I think she is one of the worst although I like her better than Nora O'Donald.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:04 AM
Response to Original message
6. Meh. Another talking head with a political agenda.
These days, they're dime a dozen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tularetom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
7. She's one of the worst
for at least ten years I've muted the TV every time she appeared because I knew she was going to spout pure bullshit from the puke talking points. It's nice to see her finally being exposed as a republic shill who only keeps her job because of her connections within the beltway cocktail party circuit.

Plus she's fugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
10. she really is amazingly bad....even Imus caught her out on a very thin limb.
I think that's what the "drunk again" reference is about...haven't read the huffingtonpost thing yet

did you see this...one of several Mitchell threads?

we seem to be ahead of the rest of the world, once again.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x396017
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
11. Someone posted earlier today about Andrea "drinking problem" but gave no Link?
Anyone have a link to her having alcohol problems in the past?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-14-07 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. how could you NOT have a drinking problem when you have to wake up
every morning to a character out of "V"?

what a couple....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC