Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The 700 Billion Dollar Question : Why Did They Allow This 'Crisis' To Become A Crisis?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:49 PM
Original message
The 700 Billion Dollar Question : Why Did They Allow This 'Crisis' To Become A Crisis?
Two weeks ago, no one (ostensibly) could see this coming; yet now, we're told, if we aren't stampeded into action, the economy will collapse.

This makes no sense to me...what am I missing?:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
avaistheone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
1. "This not the time for pointing fingers"
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lifesbeautifulmagic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:51 PM
Response to Original message
2. yes, that is one of the questions that should be asked and
answered, and especially, since we now know Paulson was working on the bailout for 4 months.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynnTheDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
3. And yet George W. bUsh had this "bailout" package sitting on his desk months ago.
Funny...reminds me of how his "patriot act" was written before 911.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. And why did they work on the initial proposal 5 months but wait
..until the last minute to present it to Congress instead of giving them time to deliberate on something so serious and costly?

Sounds more like an attempt at blackmail that failed than a real crisis.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cessna Invesco Palin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:57 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. Because nobody would contemplate a hectagabillionzillion bailout...
...unless things had gon totally shit? Just a thought.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fresh_Start Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:54 PM
Response to Original message
5. it was a slow train wreck in progress
they tried numerous things but none of them were able to slow the train to a stop

its been underway for more than a year, its just accelerating
as more and more measure failed to stop the disaster in motion, they tried more different things

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CJCRANE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. The fundamentals of the economy are strong
one day and then weak the next.

Nothing you can do about it. That's just how it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
7. And yet DU saw it coming, so did Moyers, and Krugman, and who knows how
many others...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. My guess is they knew a big drop was coming and simply tried to exploit it.
Frankly I don't think the "bailout" is or was ever intended to have any effect whatsoever on the "market." Just another heist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AzDar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
25. I'm no economist, but that is certainly what I think , too. I felt the same way about
the run-up to the IWR; the Patriot Act; and the Military Commissions Act....


These things DO NOT need to be dealt with in such a rush, and historically, when Gee-Dubya and his All-GOP Band are involved it turns out to be a tremendous scam.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #25
29. For once we dodged the bullet.
My hunch is that tomorrow's manufactured crisis will make this one vanish. Win some, lose some, they tried while they still had a chance, and I just hope to heck we don't give them another one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Astrad Donating Member (374 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. Accountability is for sissies!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
killbotfactory Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:57 PM
Response to Original message
11. The bailout plan is months old
Somebody saw this coming.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aquart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
12. Nothing. You see perfectly clearly.
Why did they allow Osama to attack by ignoring the intelligence briefings? Why did they lie about Saddam?

What is the ONE thing you can absolutely count on with this administration: THEY LIE ABOUT EVERYTHING.

The first question to ask any Bush official is WHY ARE YOU LYING?

A number of people have compiled excellent posts about treasury machinations in the previous weeks. Paulson and his cronies will not be made poor by the bailout. There is no assurance whatsoever that any of the rest of us will fare as well. Nor even that ultimate collapse would be prevented. And some learned opinions that collapse would be assisted by the bailout.

I have to say, I am charmed by the conservative outrage that this is the first step toward socialism. If that were true, I would remove my personal objections. But it ain't.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tjwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 03:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. 700 billion to these greedy bastards would merely have forestalled what you see today...
...until the new President took the oval office.

Then it would have been 4 years of "blame the democrats" while they prep Jeb to take over in 2012 and complete the corporate/federal govt merger.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ElboRuum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:04 PM
Response to Original message
14. This makes no sense to you?
Then you're not missing a goddamn thing. You've got it exactly right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BelgianMadCow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
15. Allow? Started, you mean.
I confess I'm a Shock Doctriner...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
screembloodymurder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:08 PM
Response to Original message
16. The Republicans played a game of chicken and lost.
They knew supporting the bill was political suicide. Their strategy was to have as few Republican "yea" votes as possible, but they wanted the bill passed. Pelosi gave them inflated numbers because she didn't want the bill to pass unless the Republicans were on board. The Pukes weaseled out and the bill failed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marions ghost Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #16
30. yep
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
17. it was obvious a year ago, and ridiculously obvious when bear failed.
shrub and the gang were either in denial or wanted everything to blow up under the next president.

meanwhile, congress was more concerned about elections.

the fed did what it could, which was inject liquidity, but it misdiagnosed the problem and did too little, too late (in part due to pressure from the idiots complaining about inflation). in any event, they failed to see the need for fiscal action.

had we gotten things under way a year ago, we'd be in a very different situation today.

slow motion train wreck, indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:19 PM
Response to Reply #17
21. Agree entirely ...and all one had to do was pay attention to the posts here on DU
We got out of the market at its high a year ago July.
We didn't take vacations.
We didn't buy new cars.
We didn't buy new anything.
We paid off our debt.
We invested in gemstones with a temporary play in European bonds to take advantage of the falling dollar.
We have doubled our investments since July 2007 with virtually no downside risk.
Thank you DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
unblock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. you're welcome! now please remit my fee
Edited on Mon Sep-29-08 04:31 PM by unblock
:)

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kip Humphrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. Don't you know that DU is a philanthropic institution of insight and opinion?
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paparush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #17
27. Exactly. By the time Bear-Stearns collapsed, the house of cards was already on fire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
specialed Donating Member (276 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. THEY? If you're making seven figures a year + stock options are you going to
1. Ride it as long as you can then bail?
2. Ride it up to the end and say you'll save the company ?

That's the kind of decision these guys on wall street were making.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SammyWinstonJack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. Option #1 is what they chose.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ddeclue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:12 PM
Response to Original message
20. Because they never allow facts to get in the way of ideology until
it's too late.

Otherwise there would not have been a 9/11, Katrina, or wall street collapse.

They belief in their innate "rightness" because they believe FIRST, they are TRUE BELIEVERS who drink the Kool Aid from 55 gallon drums. The most important criteria for working in the Bush Administration is to be TB.

This is what makes Gov. Palin so damned scary - she's TB, she's the next Harriet Meiers.

Doug D.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PVnRT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
24. Because they still believe in laissez-faire capitalism
Despite the sudden infection of "populism" amongst Republicans, that many here are buying into, their solution is the same: cut taxes, deregulate, cut social spending. They will obstruct anything that doesn't accomplish that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofthedial Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:46 PM
Response to Original message
26. it's been planned for a long time
they just wanted one last shot at our money before the bush cabal gets a firing squad at the Hague.

a trillion bucks to wall street? pretty much privatizing social security without having to win the vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
redqueen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-29-08 05:47 PM
Response to Original message
28. Without the crisis, how could they pull the Shock Doctrine tactic?
They had to, to get their lootin on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 06:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC