Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

So Halliburton moves HQ to Dubai, and Banks Its ill-gotten gains there? not in the US? pays no taxes

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Blackhatjack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:56 AM
Original message
So Halliburton moves HQ to Dubai, and Banks Its ill-gotten gains there? not in the US? pays no taxes
Think about this for a minute.

Where do you physically deposit billions of dollars in cash without bringing it back into the US where tax would have to be paid on it?

Do you take it to a foreign exchange Bank to convert it to other currencies? Not only would that be hard to do, it would draw lots of attention.

In Dubai, the physical dollars are being 'banked' and distributed by a bank that will not turn over the conversion data to the US.

The billions being 'lost or misplaced' in Iraq are being handled the same way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. No Federal taxes, no Federal contracts, a pure and simple no-brainer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. You need to revisit US tax laws, corporate law, and US contracting policy
Will it be a US company
Where will it be incorporated
Who owns it

Those are the key factors for taxes and juridiction and whether they can hold US contracts, particularly with the DoD, not where it is headquartered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indepat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Congress, imo, needs to revisit the entire issue
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. They tried to attatch a resolution to War funding several times in the past few years
but the repigs kept killing it.

Wonder why?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:25 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. a resolution that dealt with where a company was headquatered?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. yeah, was really minor, a year or two ago.
basically, no company not based in the US (aka, not paying taxes) could recieve government contracts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. It would not necessarily impact this situation
If the company remains incorporated in NJ, is US owned with US corporate officers it doesn't matter where the HQ is. They will still have to pay US taxes, obey relevant portions of US law etc. If they aren't, then they lose their US Gov contracts.

Look at it this was...a corporation is a citizen of sorts. As long as a US citizen remains a US citizen they are subject to US law, even if they are living in another country. They also have the rights of a US citizen to vote etc. Give up the citizenship any you lose the rights as well as the obligations. (this is a simplified ananlogy... there are special cases involving taxes etc)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ComerPerro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. problem is, they get to lose the obligations but keep the rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. If they become a foreign company they lose the right to bid on US contracts
Depending on how it is done would control who has any US liability. Nothing I have seen so far indicates that they are going to not be a US company.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
6. And moves their records to a place where they can't be subpeoned
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Solo_in_MD Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Not true if they remain a US corporation
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 01:14 PM by Solo_in_MD
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:03 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC