Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Mistakes were made." Note the passive voice.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
TexasThoughtCriminal Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:19 AM
Original message
"Mistakes were made." Note the passive voice.
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 10:38 AM by TexasThoughtCriminal
Gonzalez keeps repeating those words. Now even bush** is using those words as he faces a new reality. I bet Luntz the Language Man put that in his memo.

But note the passive voice. There is no subject. It escapes responsibility. No accountability.

"Mistakes were made."
Think about that every time you hear those words.




Edit to make more grammatically accurate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Was it CNN that went into that last night? It seems that Miles O'Brien of CNN
was the only one who could get Gonzo to admit that he, himself made a mistake.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orrex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's lesson one from the Playbook of Corporate Non-Accountability
You're quite correct to point it out--it's a trick of equivocation and moral dishonesty, and anyone who attempts to use it should be called on it.

Lesson Two, by the way, is the Apology Without Admitting Fault, as in "I'm sorry if anyone was offended." The careful reader/listener will identify that this formulation places the blame on the person to whom the apology should actually be made, rather than on the person who committed the fault.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:27 AM
Response to Original message
3. Directly from the lips of Richard Nixon during Watergate
if I recall correctly.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. Or one can assume that the agent in every statement is he who puts his voice to it
As we certainly do here with respect to those in the WH who would prefer to remain nameless.

The basic rule of accountability is that those who are responsible must be held to be responsible, especially when you cut out the possibility for responsible people (read here members of the senate) participating because of political advantages snuck into the U.S.A. P.A.T.R.I.O.T. Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. Not 'tense'.
'Voice' is ok. Even 'diathesis'.

Please keep tense, mood, aspect, and voice separate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasThoughtCriminal Donating Member (890 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. You are, of course, correct.
and I edited my text.

For someone degreed in engineering, my grammar and spelling is better than my peers, IMHO. But I'm not perfect. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Sorry for being snarky.
I'm a linguist. I've gotten over my grammar-Nazi phase, but I'm still a linguistics Nazi of sorts.

(I started out as an engineering student ... never really liked statics/strength of materials, didn't get the math behind phasors for my required EE class until after the class ended, and decided perhaps I liked science and languages better than reaction vessel design and fussing over non-laminar fluid flow.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gasperc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. like slipping in the no senate confirmation required rule
ooops that was a major fuck up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MissMillie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. it's all doublespeak anyway
one the one hand he says the prez can fire any prosecutor at any time for any reason... if that's the case, what were the "mistakes"?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
npincus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. it's those invisible hands again...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC