Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Three things I noticed about KSM's confession...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:46 AM
Original message
Three things I noticed about KSM's confession...
For this discussion, I will assume that the confession is true (ignoring all the obvious red flags). I have read the official transcript and I am posting a summary from the Guardian:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/alqaida/story/0,,2034383,00.html

SNIP

What Mohammed told the tribunal:

· I was member of al-Qaida council

· I was director for planning and execution of 9/11, fr om A to Z

· I was commander for foreign ops

· I was directly in charge ... of cell for biological weapons, and follow-up on dirty bomb ops on American soil

· I was responsible for shoe bomber operation to down two US planes

· I was responsible for Bali bombing

· I was responsible for second wave attacks after 9/11: California; Chicago; Washington; Empire State, NY

· I was responsible for operations to destroy American vessels in the Hormuz, Gibraltar, and Singapore

· I was responsible for planning operation to destroy Panama canal

· I was responsible for planning assassination of ex-US presidents, including Carter and Clinton

· I was responsible for planning operation to destroy Heathrow, Canary Wharf and Big Ben

· I shared responsibility for assassination attempt on John Paul II in Philippines

· I was responsible for operation to assassinate President Musharraf

END

Three things jumped out at me about this:

1. No mention of any attempt to assassinate Bush.

2. No mention of the Anthrax attacks of late 2001.

3. No mention of the ISI's involvement in financing.

Anything else jump out at YOU about this confession?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:51 AM
Response to Original message
1. What jumped out at me was the breadth of the "confession" like
it was a code of some kind to hint that it was coerced and not a voluntary admission of guilt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
acmavm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 10:57 AM
Response to Original message
2. My goodness, he was certainly a busy boy. Did he indicate
where he buried Hoffa by any chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sammythecat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Ha! That was my first thought too
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 12:13 PM by sammythecat
:rofl:

Quite a long list!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:00 AM
Response to Original message
3. There was an FBI or CIA somebody on NPR about half an hour ago
saying that he strongly suspects that the confession was not wholly the truth, citing some of the reasons stated in these posts. I don't know his name because the interview was already in progress when I turned the car radio on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:05 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Do you remember which program it was by any chance?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:13 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Might have been towards the end of Morning Edition. I'm not sure
since they've recently changed their lineup locally. It couldn't have been The Exchange because it has a male host. The interviewer was a female.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
8. Thanks...I'll try to find the podcast nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Try this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Thank you...
Edited on Thu Mar-15-07 12:12 PM by Sir Jeffrey
I couldn't find the podcast yet but this is better.

On edit: The gentlemen being interviewed here, Jack Cloonan, was the FBI guy interviewed by Michael Moore in F-911
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skidmore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:22 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Interesting footnote.
I didn't catch the whole interview. My first thought early this morning when I heard the initial story was how on reliable the confession could it be since you just know he was tortured. This Cloonan guy said that KSM was renditioned out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ck4829 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
5. No anthrax, good catch. K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MorningGlow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
7. Yeah
When exactly Osama handed over the reins, since he supposedly said HE was in charge of the whole thing. Whatever happened to that guy...hm...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mmonk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
9. They aren't covering all their bases, are they?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:33 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. Bingo!
So now the question hinges on a crucial fact:

Is KSM really responsible for everything listed, or not?

If he is, then we have our answers regarding my three points.

If he is not, then he is a patsy to some degree. A patsy suggests (does NOT necessarily prove) a cover-up. A patsy could also suggest political scapegoating.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Faryn Balyncd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:33 AM
Response to Original message
10. What is "the ISI"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. Here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
13. I'm wondering if he's taking the fall for others
He already knows he's probably going to get the death penalty anyway. So why not claim to be responsible for just about everything else al-Quaida may have been involved in? It may make our intelligence people not look as hard for the real leaders.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. I considered this...
but ruled it out. He has no reason to trust that the US authorities will rely on his words. He also has no reason to trust that the US authorities would strike a deal with him and still uphold their end of the bargain.

The guy has been tortured for years by the US and their proxies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllegroRondo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. I figured that after a certain point
he would just say "screw all this" and give the US as much bogus and half-false information as he could think of, just to keep our intelligence agencies tied up for years checking it all out. He's not looking for a deal, he already knows hes getting a death sentance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. Your argument relies on a pretty big assumption...
that the US doesn't already know everything about KSM, his actions, involvement with 9-11, etc.

I am not saying you're wrong. I am saying that I think the evidence is there, from public and leaked sources, that leads me to conclude the US would know what was true and was BS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
15. Well, I'd say the MISSION has definitely been ACCOMPLISHED.
We can pull out of Afghanistan and Iraq now, right? Since we have obviously won the WARONTERRA by nailing this guy?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #15
16. No!
The war must go on forever...and ever...and ever...and ever...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tanyev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #15
24. We got him before we even invaded Iraq.
As the result of a CIA operation in Pakistan. I'm not seeing that factoid pushed very hard in any of the coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ripple Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
22. The timing of the Pentagon release raised my eyebrows
This will certainly divert press attention from the Gonzales/DOJ/WH scandal for a while.

What better way to shift the attention away from a corruption scandal that goes all the way to the WH, than to remind people of 9/11 and the need to protect us from the world's "evil-doers". They're betting that once again, fear will trump democracy. In light of the events of the past six years, it's probably a pretty safe bet.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC