Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lying under Oath to Congress.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:31 PM
Original message
Lying under Oath to Congress.
What are the consequences? Who brings the charge? Will Gonzo be charged?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
porphyrian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. It got Clinton impeached. - n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bryant69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. Grand Jury- not Congress
But it's still a crime either way, so I'd think a similar situation would apply.

Bryant
Check it out --> http://politicalcomment.blogspot.com
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OPERATIONMINDCRIME Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. Personally, I Think He'll Resign Before Then.
Once he does, I'm sure that will no longer even matter. If not, he can be impeached.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
3. Lying under oath....
1. Perjury

2. Obstruction
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Justice Is Comin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:35 PM
Response to Original message
4. I wonder who the top attorney
in the United States gets for an attorney :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dweller Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:37 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Jim Baker III
i think.

not that i'd be suprised.
dp
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greeby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
6. Put it this way
Remember when Gonzo was before Specter's Judiciary Committee, he wasn't under oath and was a cocky little bastard. When he came before Leahy's Committee, he was stuttering and stammering and tripping over himself to not lie.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razors edge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. Always easier to lie
when one of the biggest liars in the country refuses to swear you in, repeatedly.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aint_no_life_nowhere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
9. I think it could be grounds for a complaint with the Texas State Bar
If he can't practice law and is disbarred or suspended or otherwise disciplined, I don't think he can function as Attorney General. According to Texas State Bar Rule of Professional Conduct 4.01 ("Truthfulness in Statements to Others"):

"In the course of representing a client a lawyer shall not knowingly:
(a) make a false statement of material fact or law to a third person; or
(b) fail to disclose a material fact to a third person when disclosure is necessary to avoid making the lawyer a party to a criminal act or knowingly assisting a fraudulent act perpetrated by a client."

The rule seems to be intended for situations in legal proceedings where a lawyer lies about a fact of the case he is handling to a third person (not his client and not the other party). But I submit that Gonzalez is representing a client throughout; the People of the United States. If he makes a false statement of a material fact to others (i.e. Congress) I think it's grounds for disciplinary action to be brought against him before the Texas State Bar. At any rate, it could be interesting for a complaint to be filed against him by a U.S. citizen with the State Bar and see if they require Gonzalez to respond to that complaint.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
proud patriot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-15-07 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Yes , one would hope so
he should not be allowed to practice law ever again :grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:30 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC