Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: Fitz' rating as a US atty is redacted on WH rating list

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
deminks Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:37 AM
Original message
TPM: Fitz' rating as a US atty is redacted on WH rating list
http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/013082.php

Good question from TPM Reader TB ...

Does anyone know what Fitz's "rating" was on the loyalty scale sent to Miers by Sampson? Imagine the #$*%storm if they wanted to fire him from his home job to tamp down the Wilson controversy they way they acted on the warrantless wiretaps probe.

Excellent question. I believe the answer is that is that Fitzgerald's rating is redacted on the US Attorney ratings list released by the White House.

link to list here

http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/docs/attorney-firelist/?resultpage=2&

Interesting, it and others appears to have been redacted by a piece of paper.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Now THAT'S a list I'd love to see unredacted..
I'd like to know which names were in bold type.. . . the ones Harriet characterized as
having "exhibited loyalty to the President and Attorney General"

(as opposed to loyalty to the Rule of Law)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. It just never seems to end
I don't even know what to say anymore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cooley Hurd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why was the list redacted in the first place?
It's not a national security issue...:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
halobeam Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. I'd like to know that myself...
WHY doesn't this white house just send a ream of empty paper. Same fing thing. They SUCK.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:12 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC