|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 11:35 AM Original message |
I want to see the Washington Post print a very large retraction tomorrow.. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
demnan (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 11:43 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yeah, but don't count on it |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AValdoux (738 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
2. Here's their coverage today |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CottonBear (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 12:08 PM Response to Reply #2 |
3. If the CIA said so and conducted an internal investigation into the leak |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 12:16 PM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Just the fact that CIA demanded the investigation of an agent's identity leak would |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #5 |
12. That has been my point from the beginning |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingloudly (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. Then why.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 12:19 PM Response to Reply #4 |
6. Fitzgerald actually addressed that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Warren Stupidity (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 12:22 PM Response to Reply #4 |
7. Because liars in the VP office prevented such a prosecution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
laughingloudly (23 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:26 PM Response to Reply #7 |
8. but..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:30 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. Justice was denied because Libby OBSTRUCTED it. What part of that is too difficult for you? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TankLV (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 03:55 PM Response to Reply #9 |
20. I think we have another one! |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
never cry wolf (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 03:58 PM Response to Reply #20 |
21. Definitely |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #8 |
14. Because the statute requires intent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dogday (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:38 PM Response to Reply #8 |
15. First of all you have to prove intent |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Virginia Dare (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 04:01 PM Response to Reply #8 |
22. If there was no crime, then why did Libby feel compelled to |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
myrna minx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
10. Fitzgerald had declared the investigation as "in-active" not closed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alcibiades_mystery (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:33 PM Response to Reply #4 |
11. Are you stupid or something? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Richard Steele (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:34 PM Response to Reply #11 |
13. I vote for "or something". |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
senseandsensibility (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:38 PM Response to Original message |
16. Yes, Virginia, there really is a free press in America |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Jacobin (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:41 PM Response to Original message |
17. WaPo's ombudsman needs to change his title to I'mAButtMan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
blm (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 03:21 PM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Heh - I'mWhiHoButtMan |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Uncle Joe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 02:43 PM Response to Original message |
18. That would require integrity, and |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BuyingThyme (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Fri Mar-16-07 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
23. Bob Woodward is a lying criminal. They will protect him until |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Jan 13th 2025, 10:19 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC