Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

PLAME #16 (POP THE POPCORN AND PULL UP A CHAIR) OFFICIAL THREAD

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:29 PM
Original message
PLAME #16 (POP THE POPCORN AND PULL UP A CHAIR) OFFICIAL THREAD
#1 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=424238&mesg_id=424238
#2 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=424577&mesg_id=424577
and http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=424583&mesg_id=424583
#3 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x424917
#4 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=425279&mesg_id=425279
#5 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=425485&mesg_id=425485
#6 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=425729&mesg_id=425729
#7 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=426051&mesg_id=426051
#8 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=426446&mesg_id=426446
#9 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=426714&mesg_id=426714
#10 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=426973&mesg_id=426973
#11 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=427233&mesg_id=427233
#12 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x427503
#13 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=427730&mesg_id=427730
#14 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x428007
#15 http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x428288
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
1. Waxman is going to check out the beyotch's statements!
BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. I want that wench's HEAD on a platter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. He just called her a liar
to her face
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shadowknows69 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
11. Waxman is God
someone had to say it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #11
33. He is in my book
This is payback for all the crap he/we've had to endure since 1993.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. I'm going to call his office and ask for an autographed headshot.
Swear, he gives me the will to live.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillySHEARS Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
124. Great Waxman quote!...
Rep. Waxman at one point said that he regretted
not being able to put up a video of the president
promising a full probe but added,

"I guess we will leave that to The Daily Show."

~BillySHEARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. for factual accuracy
...basically called her out for lying :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #1
21. Now now
think about a rebub doing that.

And folks this is why we needed the gavel

I hope people finally get it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #1
30. He is holding the record open....
...for statements which contradict what she testified to under oath. IMO, he quite def IS looking at perjury charges.

HOLY SHIT! This is as good as it gets!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. Doesn't that actually mean that he's giving her a chance to go back
and correct the record?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #38
52. Not the way I heard it...
..he is holding it open for evidence which CONTRADICTS what she said under oath. That sure does not look to me like he is giving her an opportunity to correct or amend her lies...er...statements under oath.

JMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. I hope you're right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
springhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #52
107. According to Randi Rhodes........
She does indeed have a chance to go back and change some of her answers as to avoid perjury charges.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #107
110. Wouldn't that be grand....
...if she had to change her testimony. I wonder how many heads would explode over that. IMO, VT is too arrogant to change what she said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tempest Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #30
54. Time for DU and the blogsphere to get cracking
With the resources available, Vicious Vicky is doomed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #1
48. He was actually laughing at the end. Vicky in over her head!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JackBeck Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
2. Kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Whoa! What did Waxman just say?
He realizes that what Icky Vicky just said may not be accurate so they're going to check it out and correct the record to reflect that. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
15. Now THAT is how inquiring lawmakers SHOULD act.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seafan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
27. Waxman: "Many of your statements you made with great authority may not be accurate.."
and (paraphrasing) 'we will check on them..'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. HA! You've perjured yourself! Stay tuned! LOL Waxman basically said to T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Yep. Checkmate Victoria.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Original message
How sweet is dis
Here's Vicky



:popcorn: :popcorn: :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
50. I swear, if I didn't witness her bullshit myself I would never believe it.
Wonder what color STRIPES she fancies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #50
71. Nah, no stripes...
just plain bright orange. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jmowreader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #71
128. It's denim once you're sent up
The orange jumpsuits are used in county lockups so We The People can recognize them if they get away, but once you're in the big house, you get a denim shirt and denim trousers--cheap and durable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #14
109. I just had to dip in here and share the snark
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 03:01 PM by librechik
justice is sweet indeed

and especially when a Reptile richly deserves it like Venereal Tension.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suffragette Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #4
24. She's going to find out what oversight and accountability really mean
Go, Waxman!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. Waxman Telling It Like It Is.
Just said she lied, and the record would be kept open, and that her BS was going to be checked out!
Whoa, she is so fucked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BuyingThyme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #6
47. I think he's actually giving her a break.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
7. Waxman: We're holing the recored open to introduce things that might
contradict what you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
9. Holy shit!
We're going to hold the record open so that we can insert things that contradict your testimony today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
17. Snap-when she said that she wrote the law 25 years ago, he laughed
and said he would look into the accuracy of that too. HA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
63. Okay, now I'm going to plotz
I missed a few of his words and heard the laughter afterward. He really said THAT?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #63
77. Yep, it was said in jest, but he basically called her a liar.
Hahahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillySHEARS Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:14 PM
Response to Reply #17
100. But Bush said...
Didn't Bush say something like...
"THAT was in 1975, this is 200-------------------------6" ?????????
referring to warrants for surveillance.
These people use twisted logic when it comes to defending
their treasonous actions.

~BillySHEARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #100
102. Their "logic" is baffling.
Welcome to DU, BillySHEARS. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillySHEARS Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:00 PM
Response to Reply #102
108. Thank You
...ty very much.

~BillySHEARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #9
20. Checkmate.
The creepy biotch is toast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dinger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #9
31. Correction, That's Holy Fuckling Mother Of God Shit Sonofabitchmuthafucka!!
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM by Dinger
Watch your language:evilgrin: :yourock: :nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #31
65. LOL
I was typing too fast to get it all down.

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:36 PM
Response to Reply #9
45. Legally....
...that is the first step on the process of bringing a perjury charge against that bitch.

Boy, I bet she sure is glad the Pubbies asked her to be there. And, even if it is not sufficient for a crminial charge, it sure as hell is sufficient for a bar complaint to get her license pulled or suspended. The bitch totally deserves it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:36 PM
Response to Reply #45
104. I have a question for you
If you were criticizing the performance of Clarence Thomas or Armstrong Jones, would you refer to them as N****rs?

If you were talking about Alberto Gonzalez, would you refer to him as a wetback?

If NOT, then why do you think it's in any way appropriate to refer to this woman using a gender slur? There are plenty of ways to criticize and even demean her without using her gender (and MY gender) to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #104
106. Bitch has nothing to do with a gender slur.
I am female and I consider myself a bitch. I just happen to be a good one and it took lots of years of practice to get where I am and I am proud of it. There are bad ones and good ones....and VT is a bad one because she is a liar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #106
112. Your efforts to reclaim the word are admirable but misguided
It IS a gender slur; it started out in life as a gender slur; it will always be a gender slur.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #112
131. Apparently...
...each to her own opinion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Morgana LaFey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #131
133. Yes, and you're entitled to your own opinion
just not your own facts.

FACT: try to name ONE instance where a repressed group has successfully "reclaimed" a similar slur. Has it worked out for blacks to reclaim "nigger"? ONLY among themselves.

Can you come up with one I'm not thinking of that HAS worked?

Here's why it won't/can't work: YOU, my dear, are not a member of the dominant culture (white male). YOU don't have that kind of power and all your efforts may work very well among your own peeps -- other women who "get it" about what you're trying to do (and there are quite a few of them) -- it doesn't change how the wider world (that pesky dominant culture) uses the word, and they use it AGAINST YOU. And against me. And against every living, breathing female in the world.

And what do you think they are calling us as certain members of the dominant culture beat us, and rape us, and kill us? Do you think it's something like "sweetheart"? Uh, no. It's something like "bitch" and "whore" and worse.

It doesn't help anyone to use the word, least of all you.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
10. Going to need this thread for all the phone calls!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
12. Are they coming back?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. All done
but I hope C-SPAN takes call now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. BTW, who WAS that blonde dressed in black sitting behind her?
Anyone know?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #16
29. I don't know,
but I loved the expressions on the guy leaning against the wall!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #29
69. Behind the committee?
I saw a guy with his mouth hanging open as if he couldn't believe what that creep was saying.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cameron27 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #69
95. Yep him...priceless
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #29
121. This woman -


She was the dismissed Libby juror!!!!

Look at the look on her face!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:02 PM
Response to Reply #121
130. are you sure it's not Giuliani dragged up again?
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 05:03 PM by TheBaldyMan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
40. I should be working but ..
.... what a bitch.



She kept trying to trot out that Plame wasn't covert by using
"under the law" in front of everything she was saying.

From this AM

Rep. Cummings' q & a

Cummings: Covert status at time of leak?

Plame: Yes, congressman

Cummings: During past 5 years from today, did you conduct covert missions overseas?

Plame: Yes, sir

Cummings: During past 5 years from today, did you conduct covert missions overseas?

Plame: Yes, sir
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #40
72. She may have written it, but she doesn't get to be the sole interpreter.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #72
101. What got me was her insistence that she knew Plames travels and what
she was doing in the past 5 years more than Plame herself and her employer. What gaul!

I kept thinking, Vicky, you aren't on Faux right now. You better watch what you say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
poverlay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #40
78. That's it. I missed it. I've been waiting for that piece of info for a year or more now. Is that
a direct quote?

If so then all of Toensig's "under the law" qualifications are useless and will give Waxman carte blanche to nail her to the wall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #78
93. Maybe they should have told her that, surely in her position, it
was incumbent on her to learn the basic security regulations relating to such matters as classififed information.

That attempt on her part to narrow the focus of the investigation to her familiarity with criminal law was grotesquely facile, wasn't it? I remember retired Prosecutor, Elizabeth de la Vega, addressing precisely this issue to enlighten us, some while ago. And, as I understand it, her expertise, too, would have been focused on the criminal law, during her career. But SHE she didn't work for the highest tier of the Administration. And she still managed to apprise herself of that information.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #16
79. I saw a lot of very long faces. I imagine they were some of her brood.
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 01:46 PM by KCabotDullesMarxIII
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #79
122. Not her brood - the dismissed Libby juror!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #122
129. Well, well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
18. Waxman closed with a big finish
What a great hearing. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hubert Flottz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #18
26. He did a fine job!
LMAO!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
55. Slapped her down, didn't he?
That was great. I finally had to give in and tune in for the last half hour or so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Somebody should remind her...
what the criminal penalties for perjury and contempt of congress are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
23. Man, I don't ever remember a smack down of a witness like that
:wow:

I watched all the Watergate hearings, listened to all the Bork confirmation hearings and most of the Thomas confirmation hearings, and I don't recall ever hearing anything like that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
35. I LOVE HENRY WAXMAN. IN FACT, I MAY JUST MOVE BACK
TO HIS DISTRICT.

:loveya:

:toast:

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #35
82. Come ON DOWN!!
We can hang out have margaritas and toast to the end of an error!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #82
90. LOL! Yeah! Do you think they'll send me a headshot or do
I need a fake address down south? :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #90
91. Just fake boobs.
Everyone else has 'em!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #91
92. LOL! And a Hummer and a microscopic cell.
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Reply #23
37. I remember the Iran-Contra hearings...
and the Dems looked like a bunch of yellow llamas compared to what we had today!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #37
51. You're right. I remember, too. We saw vigor and focus today.
Congratulations, Democrats. :applause:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #37
66. Some of those Dems were NOT on our side then - Lee Hamilton was on Reagan-Bush side
always was, and still is today.

Lee Hamilton is one of the leaders of the Coverup wing of the Democratic party. It is why BFEE always calls on him for ANY investigatory commission where they need protection.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #23
80. He was wonderful! Just wished they could get it on the record from whom did she
have the information that Valerie didn't apply under the law. Someone gave that horrible person information and I want it made public as to whom.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
25. That was fucking AMAZING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #25
28. YES!!! I will open the champagne tonight (I always keep a bottle chillin)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
32. Ok class. What did we learn today?
Toensing tried to finesse the difference between being an agent and being an agent "according to the definition of the act" making it a crime to disclose an agent's identity. I tuned in late, it was already the eighth thread. Am I close?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #32
41. Yes, but -- revealing the identity of the agent still violates
the Executive Order and that shill was forced to admit that.

Game, set, match.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #41
57. Ah! The executive order
thank you
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #57
62. I really want these mofos to go down for the good people of OH,
most of all, TBA. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #32
70. We learned that there are more potential
"high crimes and misdemeanors" than we can count on two hands
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinfoilinfor2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #32
75. Oh, I've already forgotten about ms. clairol...
My mind is still boggled by the guy who headed up the security office. "Did you do any investigations?" "Duh-uh, ummm, nope." "Will you BE doing any investigations?" "Duh-uh, let me check with my homies."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
John Q. Citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
86. We learned that stop leak works better than that Dept. Head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe Chi Minh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #32
97. That, for once, the naysayers on DU are keeping a very low profile.
Their people are getting their butts royally kicked and their names taken - under OATH!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
34. Just a note of heartfelt appreciation to all of you who are keeping us up to date.
That's why I love DU!

I'm unable to watch and it's making me crazy!

:thumbsup::toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wryter2000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #34
76. They'll replay it
Probably in the middle of the night. I'm going to tape it and rewatch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:50 PM
Response to Reply #76
87. I'm waiting for the Direct TV guy as we speak...
Sounds like it was a barn-burner. I'm gonna find some way to watch it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
36. I saw most of Plame's testimony but MISSED TOENSING
and that sounds like the best part of the day!!!! Damn!!!! C-Span will hopefully re-run this at some point over the weekend (PLEASE!!!!!).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #36
58. We don't know what's in store for us - she is probably going to
Edited on Fri Mar-16-07 01:40 PM by higher class
get all the networks to let her come on time and time again - and only a few of will know that she is arguing something completely separate from the facts. She is arguing fine point of intended law that means nothing in real time in this case.

She thinks that we should lissten to her fine point of law and has hyped it up to contribute to and aid the WH trickery and help them in their dis-reality dump of what has become the ultimate dump of political and world destroying crap that is burying us - we have to live in the dump with them and their garbage, slime, and rot. Disgusting brown stuff and worse. They are not human.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wednesdays Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:48 PM
Response to Reply #58
85. Got that right! She'll be on all the MSM shows
starting with Faux News. Doubt if any of the Dems will be invited, and the meme will spread that Plame is a liar and hack for the Democrats. :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hepburn Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #58
96. If I were Ms. Vicki....
...I would turn down any and all of those invites. IMO, Waxman made it pretty clear he is holding the record open for evidence which contradicts her statements. She better think real clearly about giving him a bigger target by commenting on her testimony today. She is a lawyer and she should know better than to open her mouth now ~~ but with her arrogance, IMO, that will take over for her legal training and experience. At least we can hope so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crispini Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
39. How funny is it that C-SPAN is running a special on presidential pardons tonight.
Just saw the promo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
42. Minorty sure got pucked on (Vicky was there witness)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rhiannon55 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
43. There IS a god!
And she's a Democrat!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:39 PM
Response to Reply #43
59. My grampa told me, on the occasion of my first election day:
"No one is in that voting booth with you but God knows how you vote... and He's a Democrat!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
glitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #59
88. That is beautiful! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillySHEARS Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #43
111. ..and here is the Goddess
Valerie Plame Wilson, a Smart,HOT Liberal!
Move over Sydney Bristo!

~BillySHEARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #111
113. welcome to DU!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BillySHEARS Donating Member (21 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #113
116. Hey...
Thank You helderheid!

~BillySHEARS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EVDebs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
44. The key isn't so much Plame as it is Brewster Jennings operations
Khan Job mentions the NSA 'pre 9-11 policy shift'
http://www.gregpalast.com/khan-job-bush-spiked-probe-of-pakistan%E2%80%99s-dr-strangelove-bbc-reported-in-2001/

and ops they want to out

Phil Agee lets this out
http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=05/07/27/1422244

Agee:
""What happened was their operations were disrupted. And that was the purpose of what we were doing. And we were right to do it then, because the U.S. policy at the time, executed by the C.I.A., was to support murderous dictatorships around the world, as in Vietnam, as in Greece, as in Chile, Argentina, Uruguay, Brazil. And that's only to name a few. We opposed that use of the U.S. intelligence service for those dirty operations. And I'm talking about regimes now that tortured and disappeared people by the thousands.""

According to Toensing and Bush administration, screwing legit non-proliferation ops is o.k.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
49. Thanks guys - this was GREAT! I'll be smiiling the rest of the day! Off to get my son now :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #49
56. thanks for your work today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #49
61. Thank you, thank you, thank YOU! I can't watch it and these threads
are a sanity saver!

Have a good one!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
53. Toensing is a fucking disgrace to the bar.
Whats a leak? Whats a covert agent (under the Act) WTF?

Un-fucking-believeable.

Valerie Plame had specific responsibility for WMD non-proliferation regarding terrorist groups and her cover and her network was blown. Incidently it set back intelligence significantly.

If that isn't a textbook definition of an intelligence asset in the 'Global War on Terror' I don't know what is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #53
119. Depends what bar you mean. Maybe we should ask the bouncers.
What a creepy shill she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:11 PM
Response to Reply #119
126. Judging by her performance they had to carry her out of it to her seat.
Cummings, Waxman, Hodes, Watson really nailed her though :7

I never realised that bringing down a President could be such good fun. It's a shame it didn't happen earlier.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #126
127. I confess I'm hiding from my clients and watching it again.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
64. THIS? Is why NOVEMBER 2006 was CRUCIAL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #64
67. Exactly. To those who think the Dems haven't done enough--it's simply enough that
they have power and the majority of citizens behind them.

The walls will tumble...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #64
81. If hearings are all this entertaining I won't mind so much if Bush clings on 'til 2008
Amazing what a difference oversight can make.

I wonder how 'Holy Joe' Liebermann is taking all this. :nopity:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
68. What I couldn't get over and no one called him on it, Davis said a couple of times that Plame being
a CIA agent was common knowledge.

That man is such a frigging obvious tool for this sociopath administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #68
74. He's a good little fax reader and I hope he feels dirty as hell right now.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #74
132. Me too!
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sydnie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:44 PM
Response to Original message
73. I can't believe they aren't taking calls after that hearing!
:wtf:!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
POAS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #73
83. Are you kidding? they hafta go home and change
their shorts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #73
89. Brian Lamb cues "send in the clowns" on his little GOPspan network
Media Matters busted Cspan because they bring on a larger number of republican guests, exploding Cspan/Lamb's claim that they are balanced.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidwparker Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:22 PM
Response to Reply #89
103. I saw that. And what's with the line thing. Sometimes it's Dem, Repub, and
other. Then, it is Dem, Support *, and other. Today, in fact, there was both of them on the same show. Is it by topic or something that sometimes it's Repub and then sometimes it's Support *?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #89
114. Wasn't that FAIR? N/T
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #114
115. Link here:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #115
117. Oh, you are correct. thanks! ... eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #117
125. For all I know, MM did, too. But I remembered that one.
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
84. White House Security Chief Reveals -- No Probe of Plame Leak There


Forum Name Latest Breaking News
Topic subject E&P: White House Security Chief Reveals -- No Probe of Plame Leak There
Topic URL http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x2769635#2769635
2769635, E&P: White House Security Chief Reveals -- No Probe of Plame Leak There
Posted by autorank on Fri Mar-16-07 01:15 PM

THEY ARE SO ARROGANT THEY DON'T EVEN DO A FAKE INVESTIGATION.

White House Security Chief Reveals -- No Probe of Plame Leak There


By E&P Staf
http://tinyurl.com/224jtw

Published: March 16, 2007 1:00 PM ET

NEW YORK Dr. James Knodell, director of the Office of Security at the White House, told a congressional committee today that he was aware of no internal investigation or report into the leak of covert CIA agent Valerie Plame.

The White House had first opposed Knodell testifying but after a threat of a subpoena from the committee yesterday he was allowed to appear today.

Knodell testified that those who had participated in the leaking of classified information were required to attest to this and he was not aware that anyone, including Karl Rove, had done that.

He said that he had started at the White House in August 2004, a year after the leak, but his records show no evidence of a probe or report there: "I have no knowledge of any investigation in my office," he said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
94. Many years ago I worked for
a federal law enforcement agency, and I can tell you that even those who weren't covert didn't allow their names and faces to be published in a newspaper. Being a federal law enforcement officer just isn't something you advertise. So, whether or not Valerie Plame was covert under some law is really beside the point to me. Journalists know that outing an agent is dangerous to the agent.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #94
98. I translated for a DEA agent who was eventually made into hamburger
by the Mexican mafia.

This stuff is more serious than a heart attack. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlackVelvet04 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:12 PM
Response to Reply #98
99. Absolutely.....
I remember the time a drug cartel was busted in south Florida and the cartel had a notebook with photos of drug agents, their children, their wives, their homes and vehicles. It's serious shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_In_AK Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #98
118. My husband had a high school friend
that the same thing happened to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #118
123. These people risk their lives. They don't carry AK 47s and
they have no back up.

For felons and thugs to play with their lives and with their service is obscene and treasonous.

For Kiki.



:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #94
120. All of which makes the flashy James Bond image seem like a cruel joke
Austin Powers
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HootieMcBoob Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:49 PM
Response to Original message
105. She used the Cheney didn't send him canard
I can't believe she tried to peddle that shit. I wish they would have called her on that as well as the she didn't work covertly outside of the US in the last five years. Just bald faced lies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
134. Big thanks to Helderheid and all who posted!
I was out of town on a long errand today (drove halfway to D.C., ironically) and couldn't catch the hearings. Reading the threads was the next best thing. It really read like history in the making, too bad the Repugs couldn't stand to be there. :evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC