Help. Brewster-Jennings. I'm so disappointed. Did I miss

[peacetalksforall]

something? Was there NO mention of Brewster-Jennings in the testimony or questions?

[LSK]

1. no mention, its probably too classified

[chatterboy]

2. Victoria Toensing

brought it up in her loathsome testimony. Just in passing, but she mentioned the name.

[AValdoux]

3. Toesnig brought it up

She asked basically if Plame was so covert why did she state her employer "Brewster Jennings" when she donated $1000 to Gore's 2000 campaign. No follow up that fact was classified until Novack printed. Brewster Jennings was the cover for other NOCs.


AValdoux

[Sparkly]

4. Yes, that made NO sense.

Of COURSE she put "Brewster Jennings." Was she supposed to say, "Occupation: Covert CIA Op?" Ridiculous.

I also loved all the blaming of the CIA, as if they were supposed to send out memos naming all the people who shouldn't be named in memos...

[peacetalksforall]

5. We heard from someone that her W-2 said Brewster-Jennings.

[alcibiades_mystery]

18. So? That proves she was hiding her employer, doesn't it?

Yeeesh. People are fucking dimbulbs.

[peacetalksforall]

21. So? That proves that it is understandable that she would list B-J.

In other words, why wouldn't she show B-J on any application or contribution.

Who are you calling a dimbulb?

[alcibiades_mystery]

22. Of course she would list BJ

Who else would she list. That was her cover employer.

[peacetalksforall]

23. I'm sorry - you don't get my point. I don't get yours. Not worth it.

from dimbulb. thanks.

[John Q. Citizen]

6. The real point on the part of the Repo was to imply that Plame is partisan.

It's framing shit.

[BuyingThyme]

9. It's amazing how people don't get this.

[MADem]

10. Occupation "Theecret Agent Woman!!!" "Valerie The THPY!!" nt

[youngdem]

7. What a naive idiot or misleading bitch

You have a COVER for one reason - TO USE IT. If she HID her cover, that wouldn't make any damn sense! I wonder if she views Brewster-Jennings having a phone number as further proof of the open nature of clandestine services.

:rofl:

Ugh. Toesnig. Is that German for toe sucking wench?

[LSK]

8. uh because Brewster Jennings wasnt connected to the CIA in 2000

DUH!

[BuyingThyme]

11. That shouldn't matter. If her cover is Brewster Jennings, she

has to say she works for Brewster Jennings. Otherwise it's not cover.

[MADem]

13. Yes they were. They were set up as a front from the git-go

Here is the filing: http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/fecimg/?99990049155

She would have had trouble if she didn't put down her employer...and her employer WAS B-J...because B-J WAS the CIA.

[LSK]

15. yes, but it wasnt publicly connected to the CIA in 2000

Thats my point.

[MADem]

16. It wasn't publicly connected until Plame was outed.

It would still be a front company had not BushCo done what they did.

[LSK]

17. yes

So if Plame put that as her employer, it does nothing to reveal any indication as a CIA front company to anyone in the public.

[TahitiNut]

12. Vicious Toesuck only wanted to get the Gore 2000 contribution into the record.

It appeals to the cellar-dwelling Manachaean perverts who aspire to the stature of maggots on the Wheel of Life.

[AValdoux]

14. Also on the record now

She made the point several times that no one in the White House knew Plame was covert. Waxman finally called her on it and asked "How do you know that? Do you have information we don't have?". She backed down and said she had heard all the Libby testimony and no one could prove they did.

She got it in the congressional record. I hope she was well paid for this.


AValdoux

[Sparkly]

20. Toensing made her own special "contributions" to that race. nt

[niyad]

19. vicky needs to watch more spy movies so that she can understand "facades", for one thing. geez,

most people understand the nature of "cover companies" or "fronts" or whatever the hell they are called these days. didn't she ever watch "get smart"?