Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Valerie Confirms Larisa's Work On CIA Doing Damage Assessment

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
kpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 01:58 PM
Original message
Valerie Confirms Larisa's Work On CIA Doing Damage Assessment
Confirmed, CIA did do a damage assessment...

Well it is nice to finally have outside confirmation of my work. I have been dragged through the mud because I reported there was a damage assessment done by the CIA... today at the hearing, Mr.s Wilson confirmed that to the committee. I await as many letters of apology as I got when I first wrote the story claiming that I had fabricated the information. I, however doubt, that most of those people would apologize. In any case, at least I am no longer on my own with regard to this information.

From my article then:

"Intelligence sources would not identify the specifics of Plame's work. They did, however, tell RAW STORY that her outing resulted in "severe" damage to her team and significantly hampered the CIA's ability to monitor nuclear proliferation.

Plame's team, they added, would have come in contact with A.Q. Khan's network in the course of her work on Iran.

read the rest at:
http://www.atlargely.com/2007/03/confirmed_cia_d.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:05 PM
Response to Original message
1. BushCo knew that intelligence on other nuclear treats such as N. Korea
...Iran, etc. would be affected by the outing of Plame as they could then expect CIA covert operators to give them data they wished to have to support whatever the administration wanted to do and I believe that to a high degree that is exactly what is happening now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bitwit1234 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:09 PM
Response to Original message
2. So getting to the real reason the outed Plame
they didn't want the info that Iran's NUCLEAR PROGRAM was not as far along as bush and his henchmen had said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. THey outed Plame because she and her CPD group intercepted
nerve gas being smuggled into Turkey in November 2002, that would have then found its way into Iraq with invading Turkish troops and been found as Iraqi WMD by the Americans.

That really pissed off the WH.

Of course Turkey never ended up invading Iraq from the north with American soldiers anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sir Jeffrey Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. It is actually worse than that...
They also stopped a shipment of Uranium

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2286597.stm

If I had subpoena power, I would find out how influential Brewster-Jennings was in stopping this particular shipment and whether this was to be planted in order to justify the invasion retroactively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheBaldyMan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. not real intel, just politicised stuff. I believe the phrase is 'sexed-up'
But when you are gathering intel, which was VERY hard to come by at the time, the last thing you do is blow your own network.

RW-nuts like Ann Coulter still say Bush is 'a very intelligent man'.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
myrna minx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. K&R. I'm trying to wrap my mind around it all. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dems Will Win Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:19 PM
Response to Original message
5. There is ALWAYS a Damage Assessment in a leak - and it is NEVER released
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yodermon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. Might it be release in, say, a Treason Trial? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HereSince1628 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 07:47 AM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes, Damage assessment is SOP, and the archivist also alluded to that
in his testimony in the session just after Plame's.

It seems common sensical that the assessment would also be classified. Afterall the agency would be using that information to limit the damage and protect those people and operations put at risk. Sharing the information in detail would be unwise as it just furthers the likelihood of more damage. It seems to me that in our lifetimes we may never know the details better than Plame gave them in her testimony before Waxman's committee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 03:23 PM
Response to Original message
8. Can you imagine the impact that had coming only a few weeks after the preliminary Iraq Survey Group
report was released on May 28, 2003? If you were a Pentagon General or a top intelligence officer, what would your response be after reading those documents?

That would have confirmed my suspicions since 9/11 and the buildup to the Iraq War that there is an "enemy within problem". A responsible officer would then task the assets of DIA and NSA to find out exactly what the Hell was going on within the Offices of the President, Vice President, and Secretaries of Defense, State and Justice, and certain Congressional Offices. They would quickly identify those who had been revealing classified information to foreign powers, engaging in graft and corruption, and formenting wars and terrorism for personal and commercial gain. I would bet that the Joint Chiefs and General Hayden have access to nearly every e-mail, every telephone conversation, and every incriminating document created or destroyed this century in Washington, DC.

If I were a responsible officer, I would make sure that those who screwed the U.S. Armed Forces, the CIA, and the American People end up deeply regretting it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tavalon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 05:10 PM
Response to Original message
10. People got after Larisa for stating the obvious?
It would have been criminally negligent for the CIA not to have done a damage assessment. SOP, it seems to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
12. Of course - IranContra and BCCI really never stopped, America.
Does anyone really believe that Poppy Bush and his cronies woke up one day in Jan 1993 and decided to STOP running arms and drugs and laundering money for the global terror networks? Hell no.

And they could do it with NO oversight because Clinton was playing along and keeping the books closed for them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 04:59 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC