CNN QuickVote: Did leaking Plame's name potentially jeopardize U.S. interests?

[UrbScotty]

www.cnn.com

ONLY 72% say yes. :wtf:

[Ian David]

1. This poll is biased. There's no option for "FUCK Yes!"

Did leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson's name potentially jeopardize U.S. interests?
Yes


72%

36396 votes
No


28%

14407 votes
Total: 50803 votes

[whistle]

7. Hee hee hee...FUCK YES must be countered with FUCK NO

...to avoid a dichotomous bias

[nadinbrzezinski]

2. These online polls are now reflecting scinetific

polls, scary

[helderheid]

3. RECOMMENDED!

[whistle]

4. Thanks just voted.....the 28% who are saying NO are the hard core RW Bush can do no wrong crowd

[EV_Ares]

5. Yeah, still the same; Done:

Did leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson's name potentially jeopardize U.S. interests?

Yes 72% 36727 votes

No 28% 14542 votes

[babylonsister]

6. There's that 30ish% that are brain dead. nt

[William769]

8. Done.

Yes 72% 37070 votes

No 28% 14673 votes
Total: 51743 votes

[melody]

9. 28% are the ones who think Jr talks to god n/t

[opihimoimoi]

10. Bush has been recieving some big time Bad Advice from the Holy One

Ya would think....

[WiseButAngrySara]

11. 72% is good! Keep kicked!

Did leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson's name potentially jeopardize U.S. interests?

Yes 72% 37399 votes

No 28% 14804 votes
Total: 52203 votes

[WiseButAngrySara]

[WiseButAngrySara]

13. ...

[WiseButAngrySara]

14. ....

[w8liftinglady]

12. still 72%--keep it going,DUers

[countingbluecars]

15. Done n/t

[karlrschneider]

16. POTENTIALLY???? ?????? ??????? ??????

:kick: and :puke:

[Eugene]

17. Done - 28% sounds just like *'s approval rating.

Did leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson's name potentially
jeopardize U.S. interests?

Yes   72%   37755 votes
No   28%   14921 votes

Total: 52676 votes

[IChing]

18. done n/t

[bonito]

19. Still 72%

[AnnInLa]

20. still 72% yes

kick

[me b zola]

21. done

Did leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson's name potentially jeopardize U.S. interests?

Yes...............72%..38472 votes

No...................28%..15214 votes

Total: 53686 votes

[farmbo]

22. If by "jeopardize" you mean: "CAUSE THE EXECUTIONS OF" our assets?...

Then the answer is "yes."

And thank you very much Mister Rove.

:grr:

[bklyncowgirl]

23. Potentially? Give me a break. 72% say yes. nt

[Qutzupalotl]

24. Do online polls substitute for real journalism? 72% Yes

[Canuckistanian]

25. 71.684% now, give or take n/t

[MagickMuffin]

26. Current Numbers

Did leaking CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson's name potentially jeopardize U.S. interests?

Yes 72%
41311 votes

No 28%
16294 votes


Total: 57605 votes

[hootinholler]

27. Potentially? No.

Actually? Yes.

You no longer have a potential when it's realized.

-Hoot

[UrbScotty]

28. That's what I was thinking (nt)

[Buzz Clik]

29. 28% say "no"? Let me guess ...

... it's the same 28% who still support Bush.

[orleans]

30. 72% say YES, the rest are republicans. n/t

[Nikki Stone1]

31. Voted. It's still 72%

...