Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

They still won't quit! National Review: What Does "Covert" Mean?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
usregimechange Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:44 PM
Original message
They still won't quit! National Review: What Does "Covert" Mean?
What Does "Covert" Mean?

Valerie Plame Wilson said in her testimony that she continued to be "covert" while working at Langley — long after her assignment overseas — because she had been covert while working overseas. Her analogy was to a general in the army. A general, she said, remains a general even if he is rotated from combat overseas to a post in the U.S.

This seems pretty silly to me. It conflates RANK with STATUS. The better analogy, I think, would be to a DEA or FBI undercover agent. When the agent is on the undercover assignment, he/she is "covert"; when the agency ends the U/C assignment and transfers the agent (often to a supervisory position), the agent is no longer covert, even though aspects of the former assignment remain closely guarded...

BUT, that doesn't mean his or her day-to-day responsibilities are any longer covert. The agent, for example, walks in and out of headquarters everyday, like hundreds of other people, because there is no longer any imperative to conceal his/her connection to the agency.

http://corner.nationalreview.com/

:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
robinlynne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:46 PM
Response to Original message
1. the head of the cia says the lady was covert. so fuss all you (they) want.
the pretty lady herself says she was out of the country on a secret mission during the last 5 years.
so there.
nah.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
malaise Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 06:26 AM
Response to Reply #1
19. Bingo n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nikki Stone1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
2. They have no leg to stand on. But they have a stupid readership
that believes things like this
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:51 PM
Response to Original message
3. She went overseas as a covert agent, but Victoria Toensing claims by having a desk in the
US she was not covert as was intended under the Bill that protects covert agents - and say she knows this because she wrote the bill.

The problem of course is that how she understood the words is not how the Congress understood those words when they passed the bill - and the court goes both by Congress's understanding - plus the plain English meaning of the words - and not by the stray thoughts that were in Victoria's head as remembered by Victoria 25 years later.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. There is a simple counterpoint.
Not every US agent who does covert work overseas, lives overseas. For example, it is possible to make overseas trips while working under a covert cover, such as working for a private corporation in business of an international nature, such as a front company which was known as Brewster-Jennings, and make use of this cover to keep the work for the CIA and Uncle Sam, secret. The purpose of keeping the agent's identity secret is therefore to enhance that agent's ability to gather intelligence without the other side knowing. After all, if you run every spy out of the nearest embassy, the bad guys just watch everyone who works at the embassy - it makes finding spies a whole lot easier. Conversely, if you want to make a particular spy much harder to detect, you don't have that person work at the nearest embassy - makes the enemy's job far tougher.

But saying this in public would be describing methods and sources and methods are traditionally withheld.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monkeyman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:09 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Bingo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:04 PM
Response to Original message
5. That is part of Bushco's evil: To reduce language to a minimum, and to make definitions malleable.
But, truth to tell, I see that all the time: people declaring their own definitions for words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
left is right Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
7. does any one know if the outing of Plame
has lead directly to any deaths? And, shouldn't, even just one, such death be proof enough for the wing nuts that she was covert?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Poiuyt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:24 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. I don't think the CIA would ever reveal that information
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
southerncrone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. Please get them a freakin' dictionary!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
americanstranger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:18 PM
Response to Original message
9. 'The Corner' is the 2nd-largest gathering of imbeciles on the internet.
The largest, of course, being Fweeperville.

I don't read many Rightie blogs, but I regularly check The Corner, because they are sometimes so completely and stunningly stupid I find it hard to believe they get paid for what they do.

- as
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Mar-16-07 11:25 PM
Response to Original message
11. I read the FR live thread on the Plame hearing today.
These people are so delusional...they are going down with the ship. They have so much faith invested in Bush they'll never believe the reality. I remember when Nixon went down...the same people refused to face the reality. Sad really.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
riverdeep Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:40 AM
Response to Original message
12. Did it also ever occur
to this individual, that she could also have been used for future assignments? There's no indication she was 'retired', and she would have been a resource in the future if her cover hadn't been blown. Wait a minute, aren't these the people usually argueing for security and defense of our country at any cost? What the hell?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
merh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:45 AM
Response to Original message
13. Waxman calls on the White House Chief of Staff to explain
why they didn't investigate the outing of covert CIA agent Plame.

Friday, March 16, 2007
Disclosure of CIA Agent Identity
Waxman Questions White House Security Practices

Rep. Waxman asks White House Chief of Staff Joshua Bolten to explain why the White House failed to conduct any investigation following the disclosure of Valerie Plame Wilson’s covert CIA employment. The letter follows the testimony of the Director of the Office of Security at the White House, James Knodell, that the White House Security Office did not follow the investigative steps prescribed by Executive Order 12958.
http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20070316154127-11403.pdf


He opened the hearing by advising that the CIA had limited what could be discussed openly. The CIA says she was covert and asked that the DOJ/FBI investigate her outing.

Guess there are a lot of folks on the right that are in a state of denial. :shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tandalayo_Scheisskopf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:56 AM
Response to Reply #13
15. This may answer a few questions as to why...
Andy Card beat feet. He saw them gaming on the investigation and said "Fuck this. I have had quite enough of this ricky-tick bullshit".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BushOut06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:53 AM
Response to Original message
14. I think she would be in a position to know - don't ya think?
If I was a covert agent, don't you think that I might be aware of my status? I friggin hate these repugs and their circle-jerk logic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 01:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. I'm tellin ya - The Onion's days are numbered.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 02:25 AM
Response to Original message
17. Well, the CIA will correct their flawed policies. See ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Garbo 2004 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 04:06 AM
Response to Original message
18. Ah, but while at her "desk job" at Langley she still went overseas using assumed IDs
as part of her work. And Valerie Wilson's employer of public record was not the CIA, but Brewster-Jennings. That means she was still a NOC.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC