Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Waxman letter to Josh Bolton re: lack of investigation

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
swag Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:42 AM
Original message
Waxman letter to Josh Bolton re: lack of investigation
http://oversight.house.gov/Documents/20070316154127-11403.pdf

via tpm

(poor formatting due to extracting text from Acrobat)

March 16,2007

The Honorable Joshua Bolten
Assistant to the President and Chief of Staff
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. Bolten:

Today, the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform held a hearing to
examine the disclosure by senior White House officials of the identity of covert CIA agent
Valerie Plame Wilson. The hearing raised many new questions about the how the White House
responded to an extraordinarily serious breach ofnational security. It also raised new concerns
about whether the security practices being followed by the White House are sufficient to protect
our nation's most sensitive secrets.

James Knodell, Director of the Office of Security at the White House, testified at the
hearing about White House procedures for safeguarding classified information. During his
testimony, Mr. Knodell made some remarkable statements about how his office handled the
disclosure of Ms.'Wilson's covert status. Specifically, Mr. Knodell testified:
The Office of Security for the White House never conducted any investigation of the
disclosure of Ms. W'ilson's identity;

Under the applicable executive order and regulations, your senior political advisor, Karl
Rove, and other senior White House officials were required to report what they knew
about the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity, but they did not make any such report to
the \Vhite House Office of Security; and

There has been no suspension of security clearances or any other administrative sanction
for Mr. Rove and other White House officials involved in the disclosure.
According to Mr. Knodell, the explanation for the lack of action by the White House
Security Office was a White House decision not to conduct a security investigation while a
criminal investigation was pending. Mr. Knodell could not explain, however, why the White
House did not initiate an investigation after the security breach. It took months before a criminal
investigation was initiated, yet according to Mr. Knodell, there was no White House
investigation initiated during this period.

Mr. Knodell also testified that it would be inappropriate to allow an individual who was a
security risk to retain his or her security clearance while a criminal investigation is pending. As
members of the Committee pointed out, a criminal investigation can last years, and it would
jeopardize national security not to investigate the officials implicated in the leak and suspend
their security clearances if there were reason to suspect their involvement. Mr. Knodell did not
dispute this point.

The testimony of Mr. Knodell appears to describe White House decisions that were
inconsistent with the directives of Executive Order 12958, which you signed in March 2003.
Under this executive order, the White House is required to "take appropriate and prompt
corrective action" whenever there is a release of classified information. Yet Mr. Knodell could
describe no such actions after the disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity.

Taken as a whole, the testimony at today's hearing described breach after breach of
national security requirements at the White House. The first breach was the disclosure of Ms.
'Wilson's identity. Other breaches included the failure of Mr. Rove and other offrcials to report
their disclosures as required by law, the failure of the White House to initiate the prompt
investigation required by the executive order, and the failure of the White House to suspend the
security clearances of the implicated officials.

To assist the Committee in its investigation into these issues, I request that you provide
the Committee with a complete account of the steps that the White House took following the
disclosure of Ms. Wilson's identity (1) to investigate how the leak occurred; (2) to review the
security clearances of the lVhite House officials implicated in the leak; (3) to impose
administrative or disciplinary sanctions on the officials involved in the leak; and (4) to review
and revise existing White House security procedures to prevent future breaches of national
security.

I look forward to your response and hope you will cooperate with the Committee's
inquiry.

Sincerely,
Henry A. Waxman
Chairman

cc: Tom Davis
Ranking Minority Member
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Cerridwen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
1. Wasted no time!
Yay!

Glad to read this. Thanks for posting it here.

:D

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catshrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. Excellent!
:woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:46 AM
Response to Original message
3. Right on!
:kick: and recommend!

:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Subdivisions Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:49 AM
Response to Original message
4. K&R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevedeshazer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. I get the sense that Waxman has been bottled up for years and is now exploding
I smell blood.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
6. I predict that Bolton will either not respond at all, or respond with a
tepid, meaningless letter full of dreck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Old and In the Way Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
7. Real oversight...imagine that.
Sad, really, that Congress has to tell the White House not to treat security as their political opportunity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bridgit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
8. it's well past time for republican to start eating their own shit sammich...
k&r'd :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Mar-17-07 12:21 PM
Response to Original message
9. well done!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC