|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 10:25 PM Original message |
Knock holes in my suggestion for Chrysler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
BeatleBoot (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 10:32 PM Response to Original message |
1. The Bushies are Nationalizing the Banks |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Phred42 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 10:49 PM Response to Original message |
2. Let's NAtionalize Oil first |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 11:05 PM Response to Original message |
3. apples and bowling balls... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 11:22 PM Response to Original message |
4. Chrysler could save itself by going back fitty years ....... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 11:34 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. damn, that's hot,,, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 11:59 PM Response to Reply #5 |
7. Very European. They should spin off the Viper. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:06 AM Response to Reply #7 |
9. the "european" thing might have been part of the problem... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
alfredo (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:21 AM Response to Reply #9 |
10. Actually, it seemed more British than Euro. British iron was popular |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 04:58 AM Response to Reply #9 |
20. The 1953 Nash Healy was designed by Pininfarina |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:37 AM Response to Reply #5 |
13. Sir your convertable has arrived ..... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:58 AM Response to Reply #13 |
16. can i has convertable? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:30 AM Response to Reply #16 |
18. If you think that's cool here's the engine |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:04 AM Response to Reply #4 |
8. you've got some kind of problem with the 1951 new yorker? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:36 AM Response to Reply #8 |
12. Too heavy looking and too much chrome I almost bought a 1963 |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:28 AM Response to Reply #12 |
17. in 1951 tho, chrome was what they wanted- big and shiny. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Monk06 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 01:50 AM Response to Reply #17 |
19. Well Chrysler was big on tail fins here's a DeSoto Aventurer concept |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
8 track mind (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:28 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. damn that is slick!!!!!!! n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Nov-05-08 11:55 PM Response to Original message |
6. it would be better to use the facilities to develop/produce the next-generation cars. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
1 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:38 AM Response to Reply #6 |
14. so well put... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Indenturedebtor (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 12:41 AM Response to Reply #6 |
15. Skads of people have been using the existing rail in the last couple years |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:22 AM Response to Reply #6 |
21. That job would be left for Ford and GM |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:25 PM Response to Reply #21 |
25. they did alright with mini-vans... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:24 AM Response to Reply #6 |
22. Have you been watching the incredible increases in ridership |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:14 PM Response to Reply #22 |
23. that's fine for the people who it works for- they SHOULD be using it... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Stinky The Clown (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:18 PM Response to Reply #23 |
24. Well, if it isn't there, it won't get used. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
dysfunctional press (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:33 PM Response to Reply #24 |
26. the thing is that it really can't be made available for everyone. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Blue_Tires (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:41 PM Response to Original message |
27. it's not just buying out chrysler |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ogneopasno (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Thu Nov-06-08 10:53 PM Response to Original message |
28. All of these are great ideas AS LONG AS THEY COME WITH GUARANTEES THAT THESE NEW JOBS |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Mon Sep 16th 2024, 02:13 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC