Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Does anyone know anything about railroad track safety regulations?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:36 PM
Original message
Does anyone know anything about railroad track safety regulations?
New York State has had four trains derail in four months. Senator Schumer is calling for an investigation. Last week's involved several cars of propane and toluene that derailed and burned about 1/4 mile from Oneida. CSX is claiming that it's because they have to route these trains away from Washington, D.C. so the rails are carrying more traffic. I'm wondering if the Bush administration quietly lowered inspection standards or laid off regulators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. BushCo has been busy taking government out of the regulation
....and safety business....the bastards!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:45 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. The last reference I can find is the set of regulations Clinton put through in 1998.
It looks like they traded stricter inspections of heavily used lines for fewer inspections on secondary lines. I just can't imagine that the main line across NYS would be considered a secondary line!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
2. There were two in three weeks a month ago in Rochester...
Two of at least half a dozen I can recall offhand from memory in the past five years...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Did they happen in populated areas or rural areas?
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 06:47 PM by hedgehog
How fast were the trains moving and did any of the cars spill chemicals or catch fire? The train going into Oneida was only moving 30MPH.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Earth_First Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 08:53 PM
Response to Reply #4
11. One in a suburb, one in a semi-rural area...
They were traveling at slower speeds, however they derailed none the less. In the most recent incident, it was claimed by CSX officials that a track inspection had been made the day BEFORE the derailment occured...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Divernan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. My stepdad was chief mechanical officer for B&O RR
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 07:05 PM by Divernan
And even back in the 1960's, he told me the railbeds were in bad shape and that money wasn't being invested in maintaining them. I think that the trucking industry has very successfully diverted transportation funds to building and widening highways, while the railroads have barely managed to keep operating. I like our Rails to Trails bike paths across our state, but it is depressing to see how many mid-size/small communities lost their connections to nationwide freight pickups/deliveries when these lines were abandoned.

As far as passenger transport goes, I've ridden the trains in England, Ireland, The Czeck Republic, France & Germany. They are not loud, bumpy, bone-rattling & jerky like Amtrak- the rides were smooth and quiet, and the seating was far more comfortable and roomy than air coach seats. In fact, I found them as comfortable as first class air seats.

My dtr. just did a day business trip from Manhattan to Boston & return by train. It didn't take any more time by train than by air, when you factor in the trip to the airport/security delays,etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tansy_Gold Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
6. I know nothing about safety regulations, but I can tell you
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 07:10 PM by Tansy_Gold
this much:

As recently as three years ago -- and I don't think tracks have been "repaired" much in the intervening time -- it was possible to remove by hand all the spikes holding any given rail to its tie on the stretch of track in Arizona made (in)famous by the Amtrak wreck in 1995. That's exactly what the "saboteurs" did, then hotwired the warning system back together. http://www.azcentral.com/specials/special21/articles/1009sabotage09.html


In the fall of 2004 I went rock-hunting along those same tracks, about a mile from the actual wreck site at Quail Springs Wash. Each plate that secures a rail to the tie has holes for three spikes. I didn't see a single plate that contained all three spikes; most had only two, some had only one. All were so loose they could easily be removed by hand, no tools required. The rail bed was liberally littered with rusty spikes that had presumably bounced or vibrated out of their plates, as well as with stray steel balls that had fallen out of the wheel bearings of rail cars.

This site is within seven miles of a major nuclear power plant and not too far from three or four conventional power plants. I'm not divulging any secrets here: anyone can drive out there, walk out there, hike, hunt, whatever.

So if there actually are any safety regulations, they really don't mean squat.

I have qualms about flying, given the state of transportation safety in this country, but I have even more qualms about riding the rails.

Tansy Gold, who gets pretty pissed about this.




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheCowsCameHome Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
7. I don't think the federal standards have been lowered, but CSX tries
to get away with the very minimum amount of maintainence all over the system.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
8. Chances are that the railroad is a LOT more concerned
about track condition than any federal regulator. Whatever the fed is or is not doing is unlikley to have changed practices.

Derailmants happen frequently. Most are innocuous enough - one car popping off the tracks in a yard or on a side track. Main line derailments are much less frequent. These derailmants may or may not have been due to poor track maintenance. Many other factors can contribute. If the track conditions were to blame, it is likely to have been something undetectable through inspection. Weather may have contributed. Speed may have contributed. obviously, under-designed or poorly maintained track can just fall apart and dump a train, but that would be VERY blatant. I am certain they didn't use too light a rail, or shoddy ties, or inferior spikes, or insufficient rail anchors, or anything like that. Failure to replace deteriorating ties COULD contribute, but is a highly unlikely scenario. Derailments are, shall we say, not desireable occurances for profit-motivated businesses. Human error like mishandling the train, or possibly leaving a switch open or something like that is a more likely culprit that the track conditions. Also a defective car component - cracked wheel getting by inspection and breaking - something like that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:45 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Those who operate trains and work on railroads want to see safety
...practices and inspections most assuredly, but the financial investors and corporate raiders care nothing about safety and only want to maximize profits, plunder the assets for cash returns, bankrupt the rail companies and move on
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. A sure fire way to maximize profits in railroading: Ignore safety and maintenance.
What a ridiculous statement.


"but the financial investors and corporate raiders care nothing about safety and only want to maximize profits, plunder the assets for cash returns, bankrupt the rail companies and move on"

The absurdity of that sentiment is just astounding.

You know, you are entitled to your own opinion but not your own facts.

How the fuck do you "Plunder the assets for cash returns" if you are so cavalier about safety that the assets are in danger of being wrecked? How the hell is it possible to "Maximize profits" if the desired end result is bankruptcy? Selling short or buying a put option is no way to maximize profits.

Railroad accidents are just that - ACCIDENTS. Implying that investors in railroads don't care about safety is indicative of a lack of understanding of the industry and investing in general.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MadMaddie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 07:40 PM
Response to Original message
9. Funds and inspections for infrastructure like RR Tracks
etc, have taken a hit over the last 6 years. There are not enough trained inspectors. The baby boom generation is getting ready to retire and that knowledge will be lost.

Pardon the expression "It's a train wreck ready to happen".

This is not the only industry that is suffering from lack of attention. The Ports, The Railroads and others are in dire straits because of this administration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frogcycle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 11:11 PM
Response to Reply #9
14. railroads inspect their own tracks.
Edited on Sun Mar-18-07 11:14 PM by frogcycle
no government funds. generally a track supervisor "rides the rails" over every inch of his territory every couple of days.

inspecting track is not "knowledge that will be lost"

The railroads have been fighting an uphill battle against government-subsidized barge traffic and trucking by way of Army Corps of Engineers building and maintaining the waterways and the interstate highway system built with federal funds for decades.

They pay their own way maintaining the right-of-way, frequently end up having to pay or crossing safety devices when a road is run over their tracks... whatever condition they are in stems not from bush but from decades of unfair treatment at the hands of the oil/trucking lobby

With all there is to blame on bush, this is probably not one of the top fifty. Try the cuts in meat inspectors, the lack of port security, the lack of enforcement of highway safety, cuts in air traffic controllers...

The rails are in generally better condition than most of the highway bridges




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemoTex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Mar-18-07 09:02 PM
Response to Original message
12. Robert Summwalt does.
NTSB. Bu$h appointee, but a great guy and a good friend of mine. So does Dr. DemoTex (my wife), but she is in SoCal this week on National Academy of Sciences business. Both are experts.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hedgehog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 08:18 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Thanks for the update, and good luck to your friends who are doing a thankless job!.
I suspect the situation is a mix of a lot of the comments from above. It's true the railroads are squeezed by the competition and by having to maintain their own road bed. It also seems to me that the railroads have always been run by financiers who are more interested in making money than running a rail road. Even back in the 19th century, the companies made money by selling real estate along the rails, not by running freight, although that didn't stop them from squeezing every penny from farmers that they could! I have no doubt that the people who actually work the rails understand safety and the costs of not putting safety first. The problem, as in so many other industries, is that the people running the show aren't engineers and don't understand that poor maintenance means that accidents WILL happen sooner or later. It takes a while for poor maintenance practices to cause an accident, and until the accident happens, the bean counters pat themselves on the back over all the savings they made by cutting the maintenance budget!

I lived on the B&O mainline through Akron when I was a kid, and I love trains. With my kids scattered along the New York Central (I guess it's CSX now) mainline from Buffalo to Albany, I sure wish we had better passenger service so they could get home more often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosemary2205 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
16. The nation's infrastructure is falling apart - including railways
railroads, sewage systems, bridges, the power grid - you name it.

We keep bandaiding it all because the money is being spent on making rich guys richer instead. -- the working stiff is not the only thing being neglected by post-Reagan business and government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC