Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Privacy Note Found on Google Blog

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 11:58 AM
Original message
Privacy Note Found on Google Blog
FYI (in case you haven't seen it). Quote from a recent posting in the official Google blog

http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2007/03/taking-steps-to-further-improve-our.html

"When you search on Google, we collect information about your search, such as the query itself, IP addresses and cookie details. Previously, we kept this data for as long as it was useful. Today we're pleased to report a change in our privacy policy: Unless we're legally required to retain log data for longer, we will anonymize our server logs after a limited period of time. When we implement this policy change in the coming months, we will continue to keep server log data (so that we can improve Google's services and protect them from security and other abuses)—but will make this data much more anonymous, so that it can no longer be identified with individual users, after 18-24 months.

After talking with leading privacy stakeholders in Europe and the U.S., we're pleased to be taking this important step toward protecting your privacy.

In the future, it's possible that data retention laws will obligate us to retain logs for longer periods.

Our engineers are already busy working out the technical details, and we hope to implement this new data policy over the coming months (and within a year's time).

If you want to know more, read the log retention FAQ <http://216.239.57.110/blog_resources/google_log_retention_policy_faq.pdf> (PDF)."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. yep
:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
miketorse Donating Member (37 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:10 PM
Response to Original message
2. Great! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. Might be a backward step. How long did they retain it previously?
Could have been 30 days. Unless they tell us, we have no way of knowing whether this is a good thing or a not at all good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Richard Steele Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. They currently keep it FOREVER.
Of course, their "unless required to by law" phrase means
they will CONTINUE to keep it forever...because that's what
BushCabal™ is currently pretending the law requires.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 01:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Well dang.
I should've known that but I didn't.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leveymg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. How do you know that?
Edited on Mon Mar-19-07 02:04 PM by leveymg
I just quickly skimmed the new disclaimer, but "for as long as it was useful" doesn't appear to state that the previous practice was to retain data forever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. THAT WAS THE MOST KNOW-NOTHNG PIECE I'VE READ IN A
long time.

I assume that there are a few around the country who are knowledgeable enough to interpret this piece of obfuscation - maybe even on DU.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:52 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I'm sorry you're confused by it (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. It wasn't your fault. I'm glad you posted - I thought it took me in
circles. I culdn't figure out why talking to Europe had anything to do with us - we're living under Republican police and they aren't. Google can code anyway they want, i.e., by geographical area.

No, not your fault. Thanks for posting. I'll be watching. But, I'll also continue to search out and use other engines as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #4
10. This is a good thing
Whenever you visit ANY website, you send a request for data. Included in that request is all kinds of stuff: your IP address (which can be traced to your location), as well as other information such as what internet browser you're using, what operating system your computer is using, as well as other personally identifiable data.

Google is saying they're making this data anonymous after a certain length of time, so this is good news, unless you'd like someone to be able to subpeona your search records for a longer period of time...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
peacetalksforall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 10:04 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Thanks. I appreciate it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. 18-24 months?
:wtf:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:51 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC