Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Big ol' honkin airplane comes to LAX

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 11:59 AM
Original message
Big ol' honkin airplane comes to LAX




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
1. Holy crap!
What is that thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:02 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. The Airbus A380....
The much-delayed largest passenger plane on earth that makes its commercial debut later this year, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:03 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Dam. Do they have a bowling alley on the plane? Or a baseball diamond.
What size relation does it have to something like a C-5?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marmar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #7
11. Not sure about a bowling alley, but I think Virgin Atlantic's will have a bar and casino...
It's like no one ever said, "You know, it's a little much."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. It will be like Vegas with wings.
I hope they have elevators, cause I'm NOT walking 6 miles to find a dam bathroom!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Much wider than a C-5, almost as long
A few metres taller than a C-5 too, I think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XNASA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. It's the Main Terminal at LAX.
I know. It's frightening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. An Airbus A380.
Nice pictures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. Ah, the Airbut 380 boondoggle
Well, maybe one day they'll break even on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
47. Don't laugh yet
I can see this as the death of Boeing in the future. That and the Chinese getting into the aviation industry will kill off another American corporation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:53 AM
Response to Reply #47
51. Airbus is laying off 10,000 people and closing down a bunch of plants
Boeing's doing pretty well with it's various 737, 777, and 787 airliners. They have a lot of orders on tap, including that Air Force KC-165 deal and the new Navy P-8 maritine surveillence patrol plane.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing#Product_developments

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus#2007_restructuring

I don't know what the Chinese are doing, but I'm not looking forward to flying on any China-made aircraft. Not at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hogwyld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:41 PM
Response to Reply #51
67. I just read some news that will save Airbus
They just got a 30 billion (with a B) order from Quatar Airways and Aeroflot. Add in the cargo capabilities of their A380, and they can dominate the market again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #47
65. OTOH, orders from China amounting to many billions of dollars are important
for both Boeing and Airbus. They are a huge and growing aviation market.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
4. My god - that looks like one of those military transport planes...
they use to transport helicopters and such.

Holy shit, that thing is big.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
5. Smoggy day in LA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:06 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. It's not smog ..
it's HAZE!

We renamed it.

Acutally it's overcast today. I was hopeing to get a look at that big ol' mutha flying in ... but it was too cloudy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ninja Jordan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. lol true
I don't know what it is really. Cloud cover mixed with smog = haze? I lived in the Sacramento area for about a year and the air quality there was similar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ScreamingMeemie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:30 PM
Response to Reply #12
32. ...and here I thought it was "marine layer"...
:) :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neecy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
8. Nice....
I wish I still worked at LAX so I could see it.

The wingspan looks huge. They're going to have to do some major jetway modding to accomodate that thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. 79.8m
Edited on Mon Mar-19-07 12:09 PM by moggie
That's wider than a Lockheed Galaxy!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #13
19. Amazing...it gives oil tankers a run for their beam money!
I bet it shakes the entire area when it lands and takes off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. See it isn't just America that produces big dumb things that waste fuel.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. This plane uses significantly less fuel than the two or three smaller planes it would take
To carry the same number of people. How is that dumb and wasteful?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beelzebud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. LOL I was just talking out my ass. It just looks big and dumb. I know nothing about it.
Not every comment on DU is a scientifically based retort. Sometimes we just talk out our asses. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
confludemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:14 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. It also is less noisy
and over all a more efficient way to move people than any Boeing equipment
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ruiner4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
33. It looks like a beautiful plane to me..
it carries 500ish people compared to two flights of 250? And better fuel stats? Works for me...


Upthread someone joked about Virgin Atlantic and them having a bar and casino on their plane.. I think its a great idea.. I flew to europe a few years ago and would have loved the chance to get out of my seat for a little while..



who said nattering nabobs of negativity?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. There's a difference between maximum capacity and average passenger load.
How much to manufacture? How much to retrofit terminals? It's got SIX passenger hatches (three per tier) - how many will be used? What airports have jetways for a two-tiered airplane? How long will it sit at the gate, on airport power, while passengers get on and off?

The insane thing about how we measure the efficiency of mass transportation is that we do so assuming an 80% utilization level ... a utilization level almost unheard-of when it comes to our private vehicles.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. Okay, now you have me all interested.
What kind of utilization level do we have with our private vehicles? I would hope it would be alot higher than 80%.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContraBass Black Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:26 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. Do you ever drive with fewer than one person under every seatbelt in the car?
80% is four people in a five passenger car.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. Okay, thanks.
Now I understand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 01:00 PM
Response to Reply #26
41. Do you own a car?
What's the passenger capacity? What's the average passenger load during its hours of operation? What percentage of the hours in the day is it in operation?

You'll find that public (and private) investment in mass transport has a far, far higher standard for these measures of utilization than the average person does for their own vehicles. Despite the fact that 'convenience' is, by far, the biggest reason people give for not using public transport, it's not a significant factor in the basis for making investments in public transport.

There a kind of schizophrenic idiocy extant in the public regarding expenses. People seem to prefer spending more and getting less - as long as they can have it to themselves instead of sharing it. We see this in the discourses regarding health care and transportation all the time. When universal health care is discussed, the 'tax expense' is never weighed against the out-of-pocket expense of privateered, for-profit 'insurance.' Try to tell someone that a 'single payer' approach will cost them $200 from their left pocket instead of $300 from their right pocket and they don't seem to comprehend the fungible nature of an expense - reactively thinking that the $100 isn't enough of a savings to warrant spending more on taxes.

Same with transportation - public transportation is provably less expensive but folks seem to prefer spending for larger garages, wider driveways, more expensive cars, taxes for highways, and fees for parking ... instead of urban mass transit and regional rail transit. (Even folks in NYC.)

Like children, we seem to always choose that bright, shiny penny today instead of the promise of a dime tomorrow. Immediate gratification is infantile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:48 PM
Response to Reply #41
44. Ah, thanks for the verbose response.
Never thought about the utilization of transportation! Something new to look at. Thanks TahitiNut. :hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tnlurker Donating Member (698 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #24
36. Just to give you an idea
Fedex was supposed to buy 10 configured for cargo. They had about 20 million in runway and taxiway improvements earmarked for the Memphis and Anchorage Airports to accommodate them. FedEx canceled the project last year when Airbus fell behind on the delivery date.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murloc Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
17. I was suprised to read that it gets 80 mpg (per passenger)

Fully loaded that thing gets 80mpg per passenger. Not to bad really. Much better gas mileage that the hybrid I've got my eye on.

Seems very counter intuitive that it would actually save fuel by flying that thing across across country, as compared to driving.

I have no idea if it will usually fly fully loaded or not, or even how it compares to other big aircraft. Just thought that figure was interesting and somewhat counter intuitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
25. They're probably stretching those numbers by using the full economy config.
which is supposed to fly 853 people at a time. The more likely configuration is about 555 passengers.

Intuition is a suspicion produced by general tendencies in life that one learns. Hopefully, people have learned how flawed people designing aircraft are, and will realize not to fly on it until it has had even more thorough testing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
murloc Donating Member (381 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:21 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. you are proably right.
I've been around enough marketing and engineering teams to know that there are "marketing numbers" and "real world numbers".

The marketing numbers are always technically accurate and legally defensible...but have little real world application.

In any event, the thought of being crammed in metal tube with 852 other people is not a pleasant thought.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #27
30. I do that every day
the thought of being crammed in metal tube with 852 other people is not a pleasant thought

You're right, commuting by train can be pretty unpleasant!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. I won't be riding on that death trap until they work out the bugs.
555 in standard mixed class configuration and 853 in all economy.

When something is so new, it is bound to be chalked full of human errors, and that's the number of people who could die as a result of the errors.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:15 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Especially since the thing is so dam big and complex.
Not that I fly alot, but I am in full agreement.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #21
31. its been flying for two years
Maiden flight - April 2005
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
originalpckelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:36 PM
Response to Reply #31
35. Yes, but not in the same way that it will soon.
Soon it will enter into commercial service, where in a couple of years, all the bell and whistles will be stripped away, both for passengers and the aircraft maintenance. People will be desperate to make money. Pilots and mechanics will become more complacent. Stress on the aircraft will be more frequent.

All of the design flaws will come out about two years from now, if they don't start coming out the day it enters service.

In particular, I believe there is a great opening in the area of design, because Airbus used two different versions of design software. One has to wonder if that was enough to cause some of these delays, if it will not have caused some significant and so far unnoticed errors in design.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:46 PM
Response to Reply #31
38. It's the plane's maiden flight to America...
By RICHARD PYLE, Associated Press Writer
29 minutes ago



NEW YORK - The latest jetliner to claim the title of world's biggest passenger aircraft completed its maiden voyage to America on Monday, flying on football field-length wings and a prayer that the U.S. airline industry will want to buy the double-decker jumbo jet.

The four-engine Airbus A380 touched down at Kennedy International Airport at about 12:10 p.m., to the cheers of onlookers gathered to watch the arrival. As the plane taxied, a pilot waved an American flag. A separate A380 was flying to Los Angeles time but devoid of any passengers.

The eight-hour flight is a chance for plane builder Airbus and German airline Lufthansa AG to show off the jewel of Airbus' offerings to potential American buyers and to the airports they hope to turn into flight bases for the jet. The 239-foot-long A380 can seat as many as 550 passengers, hold 81,890 gallons of fuel, cruise at 560 mph and fly some 8,000 nautical miles.
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070319/ap_on_re_us/europe_a380_to_america
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #21
40. My thought exactly about when the first one goes down.
852 people in one plane seems a little scary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagingInMiami Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
34. I wonder how many trigger-happy Air Marshals are needed to secure the plane?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #34
39. If DHS has its say...
1

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WritersBlock Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 12:45 PM
Response to Original message
37. 2 or 3 of those an hour will do wonders for the immigration queues.


Disembark from a transatlantic flight to stand in a line of 800 people instead of 450.

Per airplane.

Boy howdy, that'll make for a fun start to a holiday!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zappaman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
42. Now That...
is a great point!
Those lines will be awful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherine Vincent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
43. Link with pics of it's construction...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rex Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #43
45. Wow.
That is a BIG F'n plane!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 09:57 PM
Response to Original message
46. it's huge
this pic tells the story, those are 747-400's on either side of it. :wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
guitar man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
48. this shot gives a good idea
of how honkin' huge it is :wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenPartyVoter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 11:27 PM
Response to Reply #48
49. I am less concerned with the plane and more with the runway-as-overpass
:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:13 AM
Response to Reply #49
60. I'd be like that silver SUV there on the right.
I'd be pulling over waiting for that thing to get off the overpass. No way in HELL I'd drive under that overpass until that monstrosity is past!!

:wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:50 AM
Response to Reply #48
58. They say the wingspan is the size of a football field!
And it looks like you could PLAY football on that plane!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberalEd Donating Member (213 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-19-07 11:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. No matter how big the plane, the seats will still be tiny in coach n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 04:10 AM
Response to Original message
52. After seeing the video of it touching down in LA
the way it LANDED, I wouldn't set foot in that monster.. major correction in the tail flap as it began to skid sideways, may have been due to having no weight in it, article said it was empty..

Naw, gonna wait a few years, like someone else said, next generation, then wait two years after that..

By the time you get to the front of the line you WILL be boarding the Next generation :)

850 people, so how may screaming babies does it hold? :)

Or has anyone created the soundproof clear baby helmet yet? I've been thinking of it..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 04:12 AM
Response to Reply #52
53. Any link to the video you speak of?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 04:29 AM
Response to Reply #53
55. Saw it on
Keith Olbermann, but I'll bet someone is going to post it at some point..

The LAX landing, sucker turned sideways, the center of gravity rests on a pod of wheels under the belly and then that teensy one in the front, that thing is going to land in SNOW like my 68 Dodge Challenger used to deal with ICE in Illinois.. drove Backwards half the time, all engine :)

Sorry.. someone will post some vid.. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #55
56. Thanks for the reply
I flew in the next biggest Airpig to Cancun from out of Memphis. Absolutely the most miserable ride ever. Perfectly clear day and we bounced around like a rag-doll for the full 3+ hours of the flight. I don't know who designs these planes, but they are truly inferior to Boeing in negotiating their way through the air currents.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:26 AM
Response to Reply #56
61. I spent many hours in a C5A Galaxy
and had a great time, got the whole tour, someone told me the entire flight of the Kitty Hawk could have taken place inside, and whether it's true or not it sure looked like it in that bay below..

At one point I stood up and unbuckled to use the john, just as the plane dropped and flew 18 feet INTO THE AIR.. I was weightless and looking down at everyone's heads.. then the plane corrected and I fell, crumpled on the deck.. the crew was so impressed that they took me in the galley and made me a steak :)

Yeah, I know a little about big planes :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HCE SuiGeneris Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:06 AM
Response to Reply #52
57. Here is one video
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kingshakabobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 04:06 AM
Response to Reply #57
73. This video shows the skid.
Edited on Wed Mar-21-07 04:19 AM by Kingshakabobo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JustABozoOnThisBus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 04:14 AM
Response to Original message
54. I hope I never have to fly in that
Boarding will start an hour before takeoff. After you land, 600 people will have to get past the same pair of tired immigration officers. Then the mob scene at the luggage area, followed by the mob scene at customs.

Even worse, land in a normal airplane 10 minutes after one of these things hits the gate.

First class may be very nice, but back where I sit, it'll be a cramped dungeon.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:07 AM
Response to Original message
59. Here's a pic with some proportion - so you can see just how big
this damn thing is!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uppityperson Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
62. I flew thru LAX yesterday and saw it. Pilot of my plane pointed it out, several times
BIG
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNN0LHI Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:04 PM
Response to Original message
63. A Boeing 757 can hold 7,351,570 ping-pong balls - The Airbus 380 can hold 35 million ping-pong balls
http://www.suntimes.com/news/quicktakes/304355,CST-NWS-QT20.article

Ball-to-ball comfort\Dave Jacque, a Naperville reader, writes:

"As a follow-up to an item I sent you a year or two ago about the Boeing 757 being able to hold 6 million golf balls, it is now being reported that the Airbus 380 can hold 35 million ping-pong balls."

When will the world finally standardize its units of measure?

For the record, the Boeing 757 can hold 6 million golf balls or 7,351,570 ping-pong balls, and the Airbus 380 can hold 35 million ping-pong balls or 28,565,300 golf balls.

Just so we have it straight.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 03:25 AM
Response to Reply #63
71. I wonder who pulled that job
And who's CEO's spouse he got caught screwing to land it in the first place!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
entanglement Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:34 PM
Response to Original message
64. The A380's powerplant - 4 x Trent 900 turbofans, each producing 76,500 pounds of thrust!
That's 306,000 pounds of thrust in all to power this monster. :wow:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
berni_mccoy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #64
69. I like the warning label on the side -- the draft from intake must be massive
:hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
66. too bad it ain't easier on the eye
that fat bastard reminds me of a whale
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Initech Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:44 PM
Response to Original message
68. Man, that thing is fucking huge!
It looks like it's going to take out the revolving restaurant in that first photo! :wow:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
piesRsquare Donating Member (960 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
70. Fascinating...
Why does the name "Freud" keep coming to mind? :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hekate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Mar-21-07 03:35 AM
Response to Original message
72. I hope to God I never end up on one by accident
Some years ago I took a tour to Crete, and the Olympic Airlines plane we took out of New York held hundreds of people -- many of whom smoked, btw. No, I don't know what kind of plane it was, though I did ask a flight attendant how many passengers it held and she said 400.

It was like the night passage through the Underworld, for me. There were too many people crammed together and the air was foul. Although I didn't recognize it then, I think everything combined triggered claustrophobia and a low-grade anxiety attack.

I look at this huge new aircraft and all I want is to stay far away from it.

Hekate

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 12:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC