Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

gregory is about to regurgitate the christopher hitchens shit

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:17 PM
Original message
gregory is about to regurgitate the christopher hitchens shit
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 06:19 PM by spanone
warning!

he said 'everybody's taling about it'

hitchens was on hardball yesterday dissing hillary as sos

oh fuck, he's actually on the show

doesn't like holder for ag either
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
1. All the more reason
for her to stay in the Senate and off the Whitehouse stage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LittleApple81 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
2. Isn't Gregory the worst in the evening at MSNBC? He cannot even think of his own insulting
guests but rehashes what was said in Hardball yesterday. What a loser.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. There must be some hitch in his contract.... "Race to the WH" was finished
on Election day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ErinBerin84 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
3. while Clinton is not my top choice for SOS
Hitchens can shut the fuck up...always drunk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. He does appear to be a big fan of John Barleycorn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spanone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:21 PM
Response to Original message
4. mr gregory is lapping it up like a puppy dog...he never once questions hitchens 'facts'
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:22 PM
Response to Original message
5. Jack Daniels is the only name that makes hitchens happy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #5
19. Though he's always happy to see Old Grandad, or Hiram Walker
:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
6. This is what you get when you deal with the Clintons. It's a bad idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I hate to admit it...but the "Clintons" do seem to be "Attention Whores"
who have no conscience. Sort of like Carville and Matalin.

But, Hey...compare them to Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi. I dunno, anymore. But, then I'm left of most posters on DU these days. :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueManDude Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Everything they touch becomes a toxic media frenzy. Kerry and Richardson are both better.
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 06:35 PM by BlueManDude
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Are you serious?
You think the media would leave ANYONE Obama appoints to any position alone?

Gotta love a dreamer, I suppose...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. WTF? geez you two are just being jerks now
Those to talking heads yammer on about something and suddenly it is the Clinton's fault? How the bloody fuck do you make that leap? Can you show where Bill or Hillary had one fucking thing to do with that show or are you just content to act like freepers every day?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. It would take too long to "enlighten you." But, if you are interested
Edited on Tue Nov-18-08 07:05 PM by KoKo01
do some "DU Google Search" for "key words" or just go out on "Mega Google" and put in "key words."

I'm just to tired of it all to give you the links we used to do for each other on DU in the old days after the 2000 Selection and all that went beyond. Maybe you are a "fallen away Repug" and don't understand or you are an old DU'er who never got the "Progressive Movement"....but, no more can we give up our time for clueless who really could care less about doing their own research.

Sorry...:-(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jhrobbins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:52 PM
Response to Reply #11
20. Yeah , and Obama must be as deluded as you are since he seems
not to hate them like he should. I'm beginning to think we made a mistake with this Obama thing-he clearly cannot see how horrible and evil the Clinton's really are and clearly that makes him suspect about leading this country.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DesertFlower Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:27 PM
Response to Original message
7. he supported obama.
said McCain was senile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KoKo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Hitchens knows RW is going to go after Obama's appointment...
for AJ because he gave "okay" for Clinton to pardon Marc Rich. Dirty scandal. Hitchens loves "dirty scandals" because he, himself is one. :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 06:48 PM
Response to Original message
12. My inclinations towards Hillary as SOS just went up a notch...
if hitchens is knocking it...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:10 PM
Response to Reply #12
15. Yup
I'm liking the idea more and more!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 07:06 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama should've really gotten his approval before making such a bold move. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
orleans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. from the bit i caught on malloy's show--he doesn't like holder either
the story was a wicked one:

"Indeed, Holder himself, using his influence as former deputy attorney general under the Clinton Administration, helped to negotiate Chiquita's sweeheart deal with the Justice Department in the criminal case against Chiquita. Under this deal, no Chiquita official received any jail time. Indeed, the identity of the key officials involved in the assistance to the paramilitaries were kept under seal and confidential. In the end, Chiquita was fined a mere $25 million which it has been allowed to pay over a 5-year period. This is incredible given the havoc wreaked by Chiquita's aid to these Colombian death squards.

"According to Mario Iguaran, the Attorney General of Colombia, Chiquita's payments to the AUC paramilitaries led to the murder of 4000 civilians in the banana region of Colombia and furthered the growth of the paramilitaries throughout Colombia and their violent takeover of numerous Colombian regions. Iguaran, in response to the claims of both Chiquita and Eric Holder himself that Chiquita was somehow forced to pay "protection" to the paramilitaries (see, Washington Post and Conde Nast Portfolio), stated unequivocally that "his was not payment of extortion money. It was support for an illegal armed group whose methods included murder." See, Christian Science Monitor, "Chiquita Case Puts Big Firms on Notice."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dan-kovalik/lawyer-for-chiquita-in-co_b_141919.html?page=2
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun Nov 03rd 2024, 08:09 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC