Bush really blew the second reporter's question.

[Raven]

"Why not let them testify in public, under oath and clear the air?" Ah, ah, ah...precedent...precedent...ah, ah.... Not a bad answer considering that there is no good answer to that question!

[radfringe]

1. If they have nothing to hide

then why not appear before the committees, testify, UNDER OATH - as opposed to closed door "interviews", NOT under oath and no transcription

This stinks - I half expected even more "conditions", like the interviewers have stand on their heads when asking questions and then cover their ears and sing "LALALALALALALA" when Rove and Miers answer

[Supersedeas]

2. it is not a precedant if the claim to waive the privilege in this particular instance

[City Lights]

3. That is the question that caused him to go into blink overdrive.

I bet he wet himself over it too. :rofl: