Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

American Monarchy is Alive and Well

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:50 PM
Original message
American Monarchy is Alive and Well
As usual, Glenn Greenwald at Salon.com articulates the obvious better than anyone.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/03/aristocracy/index.html">Nepotistic succession in the political class

Bill Clinton yesterday was forced to deny speculation that he would be appointed to replace his wife in the U.S. Senate. Leading candidates for that seat still include John F. Kennedy's daughter (Caroline), Robert Kennedy's son (RFK, Jr.), and Mario Cuomo's son (Andrew). In Illinois, a leading contender to replace Barack Obama in the Senate is Jesse Jackson's son (Jesse, Jr.). In Delaware, it was widely speculated that Joe Biden would be replaced by his son, Beau, and after Beau took his name out of the running because he's now serving in Iraq, the naming of the actual replacement -- lone-time (Joe) Biden aide Ted Kaufmann -- "upset local Democrats who believe the move was a ham-handed attempt to engineer the election of Biden’s son, Beau, to the Senate in 2010."

Meanwhile, in Alaska, Lisa Murkowski, who was appointed by her father to take his seat in the U.S. Senate when he became Governor, yesterday warned Sarah Palin not to challenge her in a 2010 primary, a by-product of tension between those two as a result of Palin's defeat of Lisa's dad for Governor. In Florida, Mel Martinez's announcement that he won't seek re-election in 2010 immediately led to reports that the current President's brother, Jeb, might run for that seat. And all of that's just from the last couple of weeks.

The Senate alone -- to say nothing of the House -- is literally filled with people whose fathers or other close relatives previously held their seat or similar high office (those links identify at least 15 current U.S. Senators -- 15 -- with immediate family members who previously occupied high elected office). And, of course, the current President on his way out was the son of a former President and grandson of a former U.S. Senator.

Isn't this all a bit much? It's true that our political/media class in general is intensely incestuous and nepotistic. Virtually the entire neoconservative "intelligentsia" (using that term as loosely as it can possibly be used) is one big paean to nepotistic succession -- the Kristols, the Kagans, the Podhoretzes, Lucinanne Goldberg and her boy. Upon Tim Russert's death, NBC News excitedly hired his son, Luke. Mike Wallace's son hosts Fox's Sunday show. The most influential political opinion space in the country, The New York Times Op-Ed page, is, like the Times itself, teeming with family successions and connections. Inter-marriages between and among media stars and political figures -- and lobbyists, operatives and powerful political officials -- are now more common than arranged royal marriages were among 16th Century European monarchs.

http://www.salon.com/opinion/greenwald/2008/12/03/aristocracy/index.html">Continued here...


Is family succession really a healthy feature of a functioning democracy?

:shrug:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's good politics though.Those people have connections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. um, what?
None of the first examples given are related to Hillary AFAIK so how does that relate?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The point is that Hillary herself is related to someone. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
18. OMG she has FAMILY!!!!!
off to Gitmo with her then!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Actually, I was referring to her son...
Batboy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:30 PM
Response to Reply #20
27. ah gotcha, you're just a reverse PUMA
welcome to ignore dipso
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm expecting a Bill Clinton v. Laura Bush race for Hillary's seat
:hide:

Seriously, I'd love to see Maurice Hinchey get it, but know it's unlikely.

I hate the dynasty stuff. A particular sore spot among me and at least a few other NY staters on DU.

I actually thought the decision in Delaware was a good one. Joe Biden won the seat, and his chief of staff will pretty much vote and work as Joe would have (minus seniority) until the actual election in 2010, and Kaufmann has been clear he doesn't want to run then. I think that's fairer than any other appointment would have been. I hope Beau takes his own career path and focuses on his Atty General job and his family in the next few years.

It seems to me like every state should have very short term appointments for Senate vacancies and a real election as soon as possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. I Like Dynasty Stuff, Too.
Linda Evans and Joan Collins *ere FABULOUS in that series!

Isn't it a shame they took it off the air?

note: I am protesting the continuing occupation of OUR *hite House by the illegal and totally corrupt Bush/Cheney regime, and so I REFUSE to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:14 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. Deja vu! I could swear I've seen this post before
Hell, this entire thread.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zorahopkins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. *RONG! You're Thinking of Dallas
Sorry, but you must be thinking of an entire season of Dallas.

It *as all just a dream.

note: In protest of the continuing occupation of OUR *hite House by the corrupt and illegal Bush/Cheney regime of thugs and cronies, I REFUSE to use the letter bet*een "V" and "X".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tierra_y_Libertad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. They're kinda like Mafia "families".
Jockeying for power, eliminating opponents, exchanging "favors", and, of course getting very rich. The difference being that the job comes with in-place enforcers, the FBI, CIA, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. John Adams was no monarchist
but his son still became president.

At the risk of stating the obvious, it's not a monarchy if the "successor" has to be elected. If the voters don't want the spouse/son/daughter/etc. in the senate they don't have to vote for them. But UK residents who don't want William to be King are out of luck.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. OK, monarchy is hyperbole.
But the fact that American voters are inclined to support the family members of well-known politicians is a reflection of how celebrity and name driven our political/media process is. Among 300 million Americans, there are surely many thousands who are equal, if not more qualified for these offices. But because of the way our system dysfunctions they don't stand a chance against political celebrity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. They *do* stand a chance
In 1992 Barack Obama was a community organizer and college lecturer and Hillary Clinton was the First Lady. There are many political systems throughout the world where he would indeed not have stood a chance against her in a future presidential race; however, our system was not one of those.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Their chances are relatively much lower.
Edited on Wed Dec-03-08 03:40 PM by Truth2Tell
Pun intended. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #12
26. Aristocracy or Plutocracy? Can't keep my ocracies straight. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #26
29. And then there's the Oligarchy.
It's all so confusing and cross-bred.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Muttocracy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. oh yes, I like the word oligarchy, esp. oil oligarch - fun to say :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
32. Well...
FDR: No comment.
ER: Carry a big stick and make no comment.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Greyhound Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:09 PM
Response to Original message
8. It's how America works, it's always pretty much the same.
Look at any board of directors in a large cap corporation or all of them for that matter. The parasite class reserves all the top spots for their relatives.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nye Bevan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
10. It could be genetics
There are many major league baseball players whose fathers were also players. Obviously this is not the result of favoritism or nepotism, but good genes for playing the game. Similarly, there may be a gene for political skills, charisma, and the ability to win elections. In this case Chelsea Clinton will have inherited 2 copies of this gene and will almost certainly become president one day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:25 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's the standard excuse for every instance of nepotism.
"In this case Chelsea Clinton will have inherited 2 copies of this gene and will almost certainly become president one day."

lulz
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dmr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #10
30. 'The ability to win elections' gene - that's the inherited network of connections n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ShortnFiery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
14. It's fucking DISGUSTING. We broke from England partly because we refuse ROYALTY.
In the USA there should be no Political ROYALTY and/or Caste system. They're hyenas ... scum. :puke:

Out of the lot, my respect goes to Biden's son. He's going back to Iraq because he has integrity and a true sense of duty. :patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
librechik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
15. Yeah--this crap is what pisses me off about Russert Jr.
Edited on Wed Dec-03-08 03:35 PM by librechik
He's a nice young man and all, but they gave him his own show before he even graduated from college (with James Carville on Sat radio)

Does anyone know how hard it is to get an on-air position broadcasting? Lots of people here have devoted their lives and fortunes to try, only to fail for no reason whatsoever except that the station manager doesn't like chicks. Or blacks. Or liberals. Or anyone over the age of 30. or maybe the station manager wants to kiss ass with his boss and hire a relative of the guy, just to polish the apple.

Whatever happened to our healthy, skeptical meritocracy? That used to be our hallmark as Americans. We have been propagandized out of that by cheap media gossip.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zalinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
16. What?
Why is it okay when a doctor's son/daughter becomes a doctor? Or a lawyer marrying a lawyer and producing little lawyers? But heaven forbid that a politician's offspring go into politics..... Think of all the other professions where children follow parents, genetics? Or are they doing what they've heard talk about and familiar with all their lives.

zalinda
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. I have no issue with any of these individuals entering politics.
It's perfectly OK with me. My point is that a disproportionate number of family members of politicians end up winning office thanks to our broken democratic system. They end up with an advantage because of the shallow celebrity-driven nature of our political process. IMO.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Luminous Animal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
24. Bad analogy...
Doctors and lawyers still have to pass rigid exams in order to practice their trade, thus those professions will not be perceived as a hereditary right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chulanowa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
21. It's not really monarchal succession however
These men and women are not entitled to those seats. They have lots of advantages, but still rely on the electorate to put them there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Truth2Tell Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. *sigh* I guess I can't use hyperbole around here.
Edited on Wed Dec-03-08 04:48 PM by Truth2Tell
But then again, what about this?

Looks like a throne to me. :shrug:



Edit to add: My favorite part of this picture is the chem-trails out the cell window. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
25. While it's not really a Monarchy, I have little doubt some Americans would be content with one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoCalDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 04:34 PM
Response to Original message
28. The grisly residue of non-term limited legislators
The absence of term limits, allows "stars" to stay on the stage for far too long, and to inflict their family members on the public..

It stifles progressive thinking, entrenches cliquish group-think, and is counter-productive to democracy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 05:44 PM
Response to Original message
33. If we just stop voting for people that went to Harvard or Yale, we'd solve much of this problem....
FDR
JFK
RFK
TK
CKS
Ford
GHWB
WJC
HRC
GWB
BHO
MRO

The entire Wash Post op-ed staff
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Jan 13th 2025, 09:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC