Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Firm denies workers' comp in racial killing

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:45 PM
Original message
Firm denies workers' comp in racial killing
Source: San Francisco Chronicle

(12-02) 21:02 PST -- Taneka Talley was stabbed to death in March 2006 while she was working as a clerk at a Dollar Tree store in Fairfield. Her killer's only motive, prosecutors say, is that she was African American.

The boy's grandmother, the child's legal guardian, said Specialty Risk Services is taking the position that a racially motivated killing is personal, not work-related - even though the man charged with killing Talley had never met her before. The insurance company, Dollar Tree and their lawyers aren't talking publicly about the case but are defending their position before a state appeals board that hears workers' compensation disputes.

"I think it's unfair. It's discrimination," said Carol Frazier of Vallejo, who gained custody of her grandson, Larry Olden, after her daughter's death and is challenging the insurer's refusal to pay in a case that eventually could go to court.

"They're saying (the killing) didn't arise out of her employment, except that in this case she wouldn't have been killed if she hadn't been at work," said Frazier's attorney, Moira Stagliano. "This person didn't know her, just walked into the store and picked her out."



Read more: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/12/02/MN1514DSB4.DTL&tsp=1



just another way to devalue and dismiss workers. Business in Ca got a big break and effectivly now never has to pay for injuries at work (from AHHHH-NULD BTW) since they now claim that every injury is caused by the worker and courts are directed to buy that BS. Now this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
noonwitch Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:54 PM
Response to Original message
1. The insurer should have to pay up.
It isn't a personal attack if the killer didn't know her. She wouldn't have been killed by him if she hadn't been working at that store at the time he came in.


Dollar Tree needs to find a better insurer. I know that they are making money, the stores near me are always busy, especially at Christmas time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Igel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 03:52 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. So had she been off duty and shopping there, she'd have been safe? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ben_meyers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dollar Tree should have known full well
that by hiring a black person they were inviting a racially motivated attack and of course they should be held liable for damages.

These large corporations need to be held accountable for their actions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Well by hiring minorities
they did establish a situation where these sorts of crimes are inevitable. They should have known better and assigned security guards to all employees who may possibly have been victims of a hate crime. Of course then they'd need to identify each by his or her race, religion, sexual orientation, nationality, etc.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rebubula Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Oh dear god...
...please tell me that you are joking...

Is there some sarcasm\inside joke that I am missing?? Or are you really saying that all minorities are the inevitable victim of a hate crime?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:44 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. Yeah, it was sarcastic
making a somewhat dark joke at the expense of the whole Walmart fiasco.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Behind the Aegis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-03-08 02:33 PM
Response to Original message
5. I hope the ACLU gets involved!
This is bullshit!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:31 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC