Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Would it be feasible for some Freight Trains to add on a few passenger cars in the right situation?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:30 AM
Original message
Would it be feasible for some Freight Trains to add on a few passenger cars in the right situation?

Here is one scenario where doing this might have some benefit. I live in Albuquerque and we have no railroad passenger service between Albuquerque and El Paso, Texas. It's probably not feasible for Amtrak to add service there or they would have done it but every day trains run from El Paso through Las Cruces up to Albuquerque and of course they also run from Alb. to El Paso. I am not one to ride the bus but if there was a train down to El Paso I would love to take it. I suppose it would hurt Greyhound and might be small potatoes for the Freight Train companies but what would be the harm of throwing on one or two cars with passengers? I understand the schedules would probably be erratic but people could just log on to the net and see if there is a train that might meet there schedule.

Thoughts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
1. It would probably depend on the schedules. Being able to ride in for
a work day or schools would make it a lot more feasible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MazeRat7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:48 AM
Response to Original message
2. I don't think so...
This is just my opinion, but hauling freight is all about cost/tonnage/mile. Beyond the obvious fact that freight companies do not have the infrastructure to deal with passengers (stations, ticking, security, attendants, etc), I figure it would take decades to recover their initial investment to set all that up in multiple locations if they ever could. While I don't have any hard data, my experience tells me hauling freight is far more profitable than hauling humans.

Just a guess.... don't hold me to it.

Peace,
MZr7
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:53 AM
Response to Original message
3. Sounds like a good idea,
but I expect the freight carriers would object, for a number of reasons, and there are 'legal' and jurisdictional issues which would keep such from occurring, IMO.

Years ago railroads gave over their passenger obligations to the govt due to the burdens resulting; labor and liability matters, among others. It was and is difficult to make enough money carrying passengers (certainly compared with freight) so govt. subsidies are really necessary.

These days, cities in some heavily populated corridors have been able to develop passenger service, for commuters/rush hours/tourists, etc. Your best recourse, IMO, would be to consult with individuals and governmental bodies in the area to determine whether there might be sufficient interest to do so.


I attach some history and pr:

http://www.amtrakhistoricalsociety.com/bah.htm

http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=94774253
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Quixote1818 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:40 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. Thanks for the info. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
elleng Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 01:34 AM
Response to Original message
4. You may be interested in this:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:07 AM
Response to Original message
6. Freight locomotives are not equipped to handle passenger railcars...
because of their need for electricity, heat, AC etc.

Passenger train locomotives supply what is known as "Head-End Power". Since freight cars do not require power of any kind (just air for the brakes) the locomotives used in freight traffic are unsuitable for passenger service without extensive modification.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #6
10. Some freight cars require power
Modern reefer cars have package refridgeratiion units installed in each car. The unit is powered by a diesel unit with a 450 gal fuel tank. Can keep frozen goods below freezin all the way across country. The car environment is completely independent of the locomotive. Similiar individual car package heating/AC/electrical units could be designed for passenger cars, if they have not already been designed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:58 AM
Response to Reply #10
11. Reefer cars are self powered, therefore require no power from the locomotive.
If the gist of the OP is to simply attach a few passenger cars to the end of a freight train, then my statement stands. There are many privately owned railcars with gensets installed but if I am not mistaken, Amtrack requires they be able to accept head-end power in order to be pulled by Amtrack trains and the gensets only be used when the car is stationary on a siding, detached from a train.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thothmes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:12 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Why would Amtrack rules apply to freight trains.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A HERETIC I AM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Amtrack rules apply to PASSENGER rail cars.
The freight railroads are not in the business of hauling loaded passenger cars behind their freight locomotives for any number of reasons, one of which is that it isn't profitable for them or they would have continued to do so.

If you're convinced the freight railroads will haul passenger cars behind their freight trains, I encourage you to call them and ask about their rules regarding such movements.

Union Pacific; http://www.uprr.com/customers/ca/carmgmt.shtml#4

Burlington Northern Sante Fe. http://www.bnsf.com/aboutbnsf/contacts.html

CSX. http://www.csx.com/?fuseaction=customers.customer_service

You'll likely find they are happy to move a passenger rail car for you as long as it has no passengers on it and requires no special service. You'll also find the rates for such a move will exceed $5.00/mile.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
On the Road Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 02:12 AM
Response to Original message
7. Actually,
Edited on Thu Dec-04-08 02:13 AM by ribofunk
some of them are already used that way.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 05:29 AM
Response to Original message
8. We have Amtrak here and there is a special rate
for those traveling from Southern Illinois to Chicago, due to the many students at SIU being from the city. But if you check the rates and the travel time to go to other parts of the country it is as cheap or cheaper to fly and there are sometimes 14 hr. Amtrak layovers in Chicago before you can travel on to other areas. I have never traveled by train, except on the Long Island RR and the subways in NYC, never on Amtrak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
9. no
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-04-08 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
13. I think freight trains make too many stops
after a while all those stops will get to ya too. A train slows down and slows down then when it gets to a couple mph or so it then all of a sudden comes to a scretching assed halt and if you're not seated and hanging on you will find yourself bouncing off the front wall of the car you are in. Freight trains that is. Only train I've ridden on and let me tell you it left a lot to be desired.
I don't see why frieght and passenger trains can't utilize the same tracks though
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 07:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC