Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Explain to me how Bush can possibly block the subpoenas?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU
 
YellowRubberDuckie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:51 PM
Original message
Explain to me how Bush can possibly block the subpoenas?
Can you say "CONFLICT OF INTEREST"?
Duckie
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
fooj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Can you say...IMPEACH THE TREASONOUS RAT BASTARD?
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 05:54 PM by fooj
That asshole is on my LAST NERVE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ewoden Donating Member (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. he could invoke the doctrine of executive privelege
However, in in United States v. Nixon, the Supreme Court stated: "To read the Article II powers of the President as providing an absolute privilege as against a subpoena essential to enforcement of criminal statutes on no more than a generalized claim of the public interest in confidentiality of nonmilitary and nondiplomatic discussions would upset the constitutional balance of 'a workable government' and gravely impair the role of the courts under Article III."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pnwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:19 PM
Response to Reply #2
11. Right. But that opinion specifically invoked an ongoing criminal case.
And said that a judge could decide that the needs of the criminal justice system outweighed the claim of Executive Privilege. But it isn't clear how that ruling would apply to the situation between the Senate and Bush today.

The Supreme Court did rule against there being an absolute right to Executive Privilege, which is good. But since Presidents and Congress have mostly avoided litigating on this issue, it isn't clear at all what the Courts would decide about a claim of Executive Privilege under the current circumstances.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Botany Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
3. He can't .....
He can ignore em and get a contempt of congress charge though.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lvx35 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. Well, Bush thinks he's a king
and so do his people, and everybody else in America didn't get the memo. That's the only way I can think to explain it!:)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marie26 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
5. He can't
But he'll try. "Executive privilege", "unitary executive", "commander in CHIEF!", they'll throw it all out & hope something sticks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
City Lights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:55 PM
Original message
He won't block them. He'll ignore them. eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tigress DEM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
6. Yah, but the Atty Gen prosecutes those who fail to answer subpoenas.
I can say CONFLICT OF INTEREST.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NMDemDist2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. my hubby says he's almost nostalgic about chimpie's arrogance
this whining is really really getting old
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
8. dupe
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 06:05 PM by Marnieworld
:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marnieworld Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
9. Can you say President Clinton?
It's all coming back to bite them in the ass. They got him to testify by fighting his executive privledge all the way to the Supreme court. We saw his Grand jury testimony on TV and these ACTUAL criminals want an off the record private meeting.

Get these muthers under the lights, miked-up and on the record. This is how impeachment will happen. One subpoena at a time.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Ms. Miers is no longer employed by the Bush Regime.
How can he stop Congress from forcing her to testify Under Oath?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ghost in the Machine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. with a midnight pardon tonight?
:shrug: ... just a guess, but I see it coming.. just like his daddy did..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frebrd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:26 PM
Response to Original message
13. Arrange a "Terrorist Attack"...
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 06:32 PM by frebrd
and declare Martial Law. Remember, he's not above doing anything that suits his purpose!

Actually, though, I imagine he's saving that for late next year.

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Dec 26th 2024, 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC