|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Sugarcoated (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:09 PM Original message |
With VP having more heath problems today . . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
maxsolomon (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. no, gerald ford wasn't the Speaker |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:14 PM Response to Original message |
2. 25th Amendment. President chooses, Congress ratifies. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
kestrel91316 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:36 PM Response to Reply #2 |
8. What if they decide not to confirm, or not even hold a vote on it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:43 PM Response to Reply #8 |
9. The wording is right there. The president chooses. If Congress refuses to ratify |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Toots (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 07:09 PM Response to Reply #2 |
10. Anything in the Patriot Act about this? Supposedly Federal Attorneys are supposed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 10:01 PM Response to Reply #10 |
11. Dunno. The Patriot Act can't change the Constitution. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ewoden (634 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:15 PM Response to Original message |
3. 25th ammendment |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merci_me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:16 PM Response to Original message |
4. If memory serves |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bitwit1234 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:18 PM Response to Original message |
5. No body can move to the VP spot UNLESS congress approves them. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
merci_me (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:21 PM Response to Reply #5 |
6. Given the timeframe here |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Bucky (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Tue Mar-20-07 06:28 PM Response to Reply #6 |
7. Dragging feet on the VP nominee would be a bad move, politically. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jobycom (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-21-07 11:53 AM Response to Reply #6 |
12. You know, that's an interesting aspect. Gives us incentive, in that case, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
madokie (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Wed Mar-21-07 11:55 AM Response to Original message |
13. nope the little dictator would put in his choice, |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Thu Dec 26th 2024, 03:04 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion (1/22-2007 thru 12/14/2010) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC